User talk:Nardecky

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome!

Hello, Nardecky, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Draft:ZingGrid, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Toddst1 (talk) 20:55, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nardecky, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Nardecky! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:09, 25 April 2020 (UTC)


Nomination of ZingSoft for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ZingSoft is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZingSoft until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nanophosis (talk) 00:59, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 18:28, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ZingGrid for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ZingGrid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZingGrid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MER-C 18:30, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nardecky (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

ZingChart, ZingGrid and ZingSoft is a legitimate company and software. ZingChart itself is already referenced on Wikipedia (See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_JavaScript_charting_libraries). I believe it is unfair for one of the charting software companies to have access to a public Wikipedia, while other competing software's do not? Higcharts for example has a wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highcharts) and ours is subject to spam? There is nothing bias in the product description and it simply gives all competitors a fair chance at exposure and the legitimacy of being on wikipedia. None of the descriptions were bias and were descriptions for the products and company, ZingSoft (deleted). There are legitimate articles to link and give credibility to not only the companies, but the CEO of these companies Thomas Powell. While I do work for these companies, the descriptions have been reviewed and published. Who else is supposed to write these content pages? A client? I think the notion we are spam and not notable software is a bad claim considering other competing softwares in the space have been legitimized.

Decline reason:

Please see WP:COI and WP:OTHERSTUFF. Unusually, Wikipedia doesn't want people to write about their own companies. This is explained in WP:COI. Yamla (talk) 21:28, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.