User talk:Naife

November 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Rated R (Rihanna album), please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 17:32, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at James Blunt. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Stryn (talk) 21:56, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Miley Cyrus has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Wikipedia has a policy called "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball", which discourages such edits. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reference to a reliable source. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 21:41, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Nawal 2009, you may be blocked from editing. QU ^TalkQu 22:32, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at George Wassouf, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. QU ^TalkQu 22:36, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 Hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:29, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Kinu ^t/_c 22:24, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kinu ^t/_c 23:45, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

help

Hello I can not add any information in Wikipedia because it was to prevent me from acts of sabotage But I omitted information about the life of a simple person and I was surprised that I stopped for the addendum. But I did not delete the information directly has submitted the matter to the talk page, but there is no reply to any topic.

I ask you a respectful way to help me in giving me the conciliation added in Wikipedia again.

My goal is for the better adjustment and assistance to grant Wikipedia readers and reliable information I've added and modified on a lot of articles in Wikipedia and in good faith.

  Please reply as soon as possible.

Thank you

Perhaps if you stopped removing sections of text without explanation you wouldn't be blocked. Your edits randomly delete sections often cutting off a sentence halfway through giving the impression that you are trying to vandalise Wikipedia. If you don't want to be blocked, don't keep doing it QU ^TalkQu 23:00, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Taylor-swift-billboard-awards-may-22-2011-10.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Taylor-swift-billboard-awards-may-22-2011-10.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Miley-cyrus-2011-grammy-awards-02132011-lead.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Miley-cyrus-2011-grammy-awards-02132011-lead.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Beautiful-emas-madrid-mtv-rihanna-rihanna-da-favela-Favim.com-58009.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Beautiful-emas-madrid-mtv-rihanna-rihanna-da-favela-Favim.com-58009.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:06, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Kinu ^t/_c 18:20, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I would suggest using actual edit summaries with your edits. Simply saying "good" (especially when your edits aren't) is unconstructive. --Kinu ^t/_c 18:25, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to upload media files with false or lacking copyright and source information, you may be blocked from editing. Please make sure you have read and understood our image use policy before making any further uploads. If you have questions, ask at the copyright question page. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:53, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Doo-Wops & Hooligans. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. There's nothing "good" about adding unsourced material. If it's really supposed to be good, at least explain what's so good about it in your edit summary. Better yet, add a real reference supporting the material you add. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 21:22, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kinu ^t/_c 02:22, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have continued to engage in the same type of unconstructive editing which led to your previous block, you are now blocked indefinitely. --Kinu ^t/_c 02:23, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

first of all i dont know what i did cause everytime i add somthing you blocked me can you please explain to me ???????????????????????????

thanks .

There are a number of problems that have caused you to be blocked. These include:

Uploading images that are not free. That is, the copyright belongs to someone who has not given their permission to use the image here. This is illegal in many countries and so these images are automatically deleted. By uploading images several times and appearing to ignore requests to stop you give people the idea that you are deliberately being disruptive. So you were blocked.
Adding copyright text to articles.
Removing text from articles without any explanation other than an edit summary of "good". Most of these edits were judged by other editors to be "bad" and were reversed. You continued to damage articles with these edits and appeared to ignore requests to stop. So this is another reason you were blocked.

If you want to stop being blocked you need to read carefully, starting with the welcome page and understand how to contribute constructively. QU ^TalkQu 23:23, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hello

First I want to say I still Beginner and a lot of things I did not understand yet but I will try, and I apologize for any vandalism But what I want to say is that all the mistakes that were obtained in order to help, not sabotage, but I do not know how

I can prove it, I like to add and delete articles in Wikipedia as the best and to help and not to sabotage the

But I ask you to please lift the ban (unblock) And if approved will prove to you that my goal is not vandalism, but all the mistakes that I did was a lack of knowledge.

Thank you Please reply as soon as possible — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naife (talk • contribs)

Hello, I'm afraid I'm not able to remove the block as I'm not an administrator. You need to add {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} to this talk page, filling in your reason. Then an administrator will review it. To help out, I've added the template for you below so an administrator will come and look soonest. QU ^TalkQu 14:05, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Naife (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First I want to say I still Beginner and a lot of things I did not understand yet but I will try, and I apologize for any vandalism. But what I want to say is that all the mistakes that were obtained in order to help, not sabotage, but I do not know how I can prove it, I like to add and delete articles in Wikipedia as the best and to help and not to sabotage the. But I ask you to please lift the ban (unblock) And if approved will prove to you that my goal is not vandalism, but all the mistakes that I did was a lack of knowledge.

Decline reason:

This doesn't address all the things you were blocked for. Also, seriously, your English may not be good enough to contribute to this wiki at the level you aspire to. Perhaps you should edit the Wikipedia in your native language, or one you understand better, until you are able to do so here? — Daniel Case (talk) 15:50, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi please help................................. {{unblock|reason= First I want to say I still Beginner and a lot of things I did not understand yet but I will try, and I apologize for any vandalism But what I want to say is that all the mistakes that were obtained in order to help, not sabotage, but I do not know how

I can prove it, I like to add and delete articles in Wikipedia as the best and to help and not to sabotage the

But I ask you to please lift the ban (unblock) And if approved will prove to you that my goal is not vandalism, but all the mistakes that I did was a lack of knowledge. please help..................thanks

Warning

You have posted several unblock requests with similar rationales. They have been declined. To continue this practice is disruptive and could lead to the loss of your ability to edit this page. Before posting another unblock request read WP:GAB. Tiderolls 16:34, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]