User talk:Nafvt1999

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome!

Hi Nafvt1999! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! ~ Ase1estecharge-paritytime 12:41, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The IdeaFirst Company (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
IMDb and Twitter are not suitable sources for establishing any notability
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 12:30, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Nafvt1999! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 12:30, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:The IdeaFirst Company has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The IdeaFirst Company. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:50, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:The IdeaFirst Company has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The IdeaFirst Company. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:57, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The IdeaFirst Company (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This is mostly ref-bombed flannel. So much padding and self congratulatory text. All those table of productions that should be simple one-liners. Reads like the archetypal paid for spam. Please start again. No, sorry, please don't start again. Please wait till somebody unconnected with the company decides to write an article about your company
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
 Velella  Velella Talk   09:31, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You indicated that you were a paid editor in editing Draft:The IdeaFirst Company but now you have removed that declaration. Does that mean that you have been paid for the job and will no longer edit this Draft article (or the article itself if it ever gets to mainspace) or is it because you would rather editors were unaware of the connection? Some explanation would be appreciated.  Velella  Velella Talk   14:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed myself as a paid editor because I no longer hold the position. Any further submissions regarding the page will not be made from me or my account. Nafvt1999 (talk) 07:06, 9 June 2021 (UTC) Nafvt1999[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Nafvt1999"