User talk:Nabhan nbn

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 01:53, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 05:17, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kabali gross

I've reverted this edit of yours because it did not seem constructive to me. There is a wide range of estimates for what Kabali made, which is detailed in the Box office section of the article. Randomly picking a value you like isn't terribly constructive. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:42, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ramaleela. - Arjayay (talk) 11:37, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Masterpiece (2017 film). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 08:18, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at:

-- Begoon 09:00, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Re: this, I'm not sure why you would think oceanoflyrics.com is a reputable site, but it is insufficient per WP:RS. We surely wouldn't point to a site that might be violating copyright laws by publishing song lyrics without permission. Please stick to mainstream sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy. Some examples can be found at WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources. We do not use random websites or blogs as references, because anyone can start a website an publish whatever they want. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:09, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Paranormal Activity. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:26, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. –JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK 07:33, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 10:32, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 15:42, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 07:03, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]