User talk:Mzungukali

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Your submission at Articles for creation: Håvar Bauck (October 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:24, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mzungukali, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Mzungukali! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Håvar Bauck (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SamHolt6 (talk) 14:36, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please disclose your association

Hello. Please review WP:PAID and follow the directions to disclose publicly your association with HotelOnline. You agreed to do this (it's a requirement in Wikimedia:Terms of Use) when you created this account. Thank you. regards Dyveldi ☯ prat ✉ post 18:27, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Håvar Bauck (July 23)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by SamHolt6 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: The article has seen incremental changes over the last several months. However, the reasons for previous declines (lack of in-depth, independent coverage, the over-citation of WP:PRIMARY-based information, promotional tone) have not been fully addressed. While en.wiki does not discriminate against foreign-language sources, it does favor sources written in English over other languages—given that no.wiki has recently deleted a similar article ([1]), it is safe to say this topic is not notable enough for an encyclopedia and would not survive WP:AFD. As such, I am rejecting this draft as being unsuitable.
SamHolt6 (talk) 20:44, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]