User talk:Muschallik Mania

Welcome!

Hello, Muschallik Mania, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nina Muschallik may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [Category:Right Guard]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:55, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

You asked at User talk:A930913/BracketBotArchives/ 4#BracketBot - Muschallik Mania about why your edit was reverted. The reason is that you didn't cite any reliable sources and your changes were unduly promotional. Just to give you the most obvious example: She "is recognised internationally as one of the most beautiful and skilled dramatic British Actresses" - recognized by whom? Did she win any acting awards or rankings for "most beautiful British actress"? And then there's the absurd: "Confirmed to have no children with Vince O'Hanlon Billionare owner of VITREX" - how was that confirmed, by whom, and why is it more important than the fact that she doesn't have children with an estimated three billion other men? You also claimed Muschallik was born in 1982 - what comes closest to a reliable source about her, IMDb, disagrees. Huon (talk) 16:41, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Richard Thomas Kelly

The article Richard Thomas Kelly has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:42, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Muschallik Mania, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Muschallik Mania! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 21 August 2013 (UTC)