User talk:Mr Snowball

Why when educatedly having experienced this disability first hand . Do I come back to look at the contribution to find yet again the contribution is removed .

Who has removed the contribution and whats wrong with it. Maybe its confusing because you dont have genetic deletion and therefore you dont understand the subject I thinks .

Ian Snowball Mr Snowball (talk) 10:57, 10 June 2009 (UTC) {{help me}} Mr Snowball (talk) 22:18, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Well for one, the "nomenclature" section should only be about the naming of the disease. If you want to write about anything else, you should put it in the appropriate section or start a new one. The user who removed it also mentioned that it was written awkwardly. It is obvious that your command of English is poor. Do you have a language you're more comfortable in? Also, when you say "educatedly having experienced this disability first hand", does that mean you actually have 22q11.2 deletion syndrome?--North North-West (talk) 22:28, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

The changes that you made were reverted because they did not make sense in English. Nor does your query above. I think that you might want to contribute to Wikipedia in other languages.

Welcome to Wikipedia

Hello, Mr Snowball! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Gonzonoir (talk) 11:53, 13 June 2009 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hi Mr Snowball: I've just answered your question over at the new contributors' help page. Please take a look at let me know whether that helps. The links below (especially those on verifiability, reliable sources, and original research) should help you determine whether the material you want to add to 22q11.2 deletion syndrome is appropriate for our encyclopedia article. If it is appropriate, and you'd like any help with citing the source, wikiformatting, or copy editing, the best idea is probably to add it first to the article's talk page. Other interested users will then be able to help. You can also ask me for help: just leave me a message here and I'll keep an eye on the page. Gonzonoir (talk) 11:53, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello Gonzonoir,

I have made a couple of edits in line with what the Institute of Human Genetics have told me all ready .

regards the di george syndrome messages before mine , looking at the layout, the contents should be first and then the introduction . I have found a grammar error but havent corrected it ( Sentence starting with Because)

I t would be usefull i believe to re edit the original sunbmission and allow for a true fact that experts still will reference Wikipedia which is a good thing but essentially the facts have to be true in what is contained in the enclopeadia and believe it or not the judges do use this information in gaining legal understanding .

Thanks for you support and hope i can help in sharing the knowledge

--Mr Snowball (talk) 21:49, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Mr Snowball. You have new messages at Gonzonoir's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.