User talk:Mover of molehills

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: mis-applying {{Redirect for discussion}} like you did here. You may now proceed with the current RFD discussion. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 20:46, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

TonyBallioni (talk) 05:15, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mariner 1 and 2

Thank you for all of your help! What do you think, now that Mariner 1 is in good shape, of me taking the Background and Spacecraft sections and putting them whole cloth in Mariner 2? I can keep the expanded experiment descriptions if you think those are useful. I'll then put in a launch of Mariner 1 section, and salvage most of Mariner 2 from "Launch" onward. That should get it at least to "B" and then I can work on refining it for GA. --Neopeius (talk) 04:02, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Neopeius: That sounds fine to me, but you might need to check in at the Help Desk to see if it good practice to copy such a large chunk of content from one article to the other. However, since these spacecraft are basically clones of each other, I think it probably would be fine (although you'd obviously need to mention Mariner 1 in the "background" section of Mariner 2, and maybe add a note in the "Spacecraft" section explaining that its systems were the same as Mariner 1's). Mover of molehills (talk) 16:54, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! You went above and beyond. --Neopeius (talk) 19:15, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For your help with Mariner 1

The Vanstar
Best, most thorough GA review I've ever gotten!. Neopeius (talk) 19:16, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much! I really appreciate this. Mover of molehills (talk) 00:55, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of TEDx conferences for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of TEDx conferences is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of TEDx conferences (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Stifle (talk) 15:44, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

By jove!

The Reviewer Barnstar
Thank you for your detailed GA review of the Jupiter article. I think your feedback has definitely enhanced this former featured article, which is not an easy task. Good work! Praemonitus (talk) 13:10, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you - this means a lot. I really appreciate you bearing with me throughout the review, because I think that the article is much better off for it. Mover of molehills (talk) 14:46, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since you reviewed that and renominated the Solar system FT, can you take a look here? igordebraga ≠ 07:42, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tornado outbreak of June 19, 1951 on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Shannon Lucid on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Paramylodon on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:31, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Verrucariaceae on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Manuel Foster Observatory on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Stanley J. Korsmeyer, Talk:Eucalyptus rhodantha and Talk:Climate change in Madagascar on "Natural sciences" Good Article nominations. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:41, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA

Hello. Would you be able to review South Asian river dolphin? LittleJerry (talk) 13:41, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Idaho pocket gopher on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Electromagnetism, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Quanta, Quantization and Relativity.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Collaborate on electromagnetism

I want to help you improving the article so that it is a good article as you've made the lead much better than what it was before. What should I do alongside you to improve its quality further? CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 17:02, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - great to see that somebody is paying attention to my fiddling! At the moment, I'm in the middle of a very time-consuming science research project which is probably going to consume all of my free time until the end of March or so. After that, though, I would love to return to the EM article and set about getting it to FA status.
If you're looking to work on it yourself, I was in the middle of trying to improve the History section, which is pretty crude right now - I actually started creating some replacement paragraphs here, so feel free to add to that if you want. After that, I want to have a section called "Theory" which presents the theory of electromagnetism in a much more organized way - Coulomb's Law, Gauss's law, Biot-Savart Law, Lenz's/Ampere's Law, and then the Maxwell's equations, the same way you learn it in an introductory EM class. If you're familiar with this content, it would be great to start putting it in, but I feel comfortable with doing this part myself when I have time too! Finally, I want to add some more about quantum mechanics - I have a pretty rudimentary knowledge of QM, but probably enough to explain the basics of quantum electrodynamics and the quantization of the EM field via photons, which is all this article needs to cover anyway.
There also may be some cutting in order to make space for all the new content - in particular, I have no idea why the article needs to include a section on the fundamental forces when that article is already wikilinked and not that relevant to the content at hand, and the giant table of electromagnetic units also feels very unnecessary. If you agree with me on those things, maybe you can take them out!
Hope that's helpful! Mover of molehillsmove me 14:49, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'll try my best :) CactiStaccingCrane 14:52, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:41, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured topics/Jupiter

Hi! I happened to stumble across Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Solar system/archive1, where you said about renominating Wikipedia:Featured topics/Jupiter that your one hesitation is that Jupiter in fiction is not good or featured, and it seems like a relevant part of the topic. Well, Jupiter in fiction is now a WP:Good article, in case you want to reconsider. TompaDompa (talk) 01:26, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me! Have you already renominated it, or do you want me to create the nomination? Mover of molehillsmove me 13:06, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Probably better if you do it. My sole involvement has been bringing the Jupiter in fiction article to WP:Good article status. TompaDompa (talk) 21:11, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Manganese catalase

Information icon Hello, Mover of molehills. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Manganese catalase, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Circa on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Article titles on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Polar bear peer review

Hello, would you be able to peer review the article? Thanks. LittleJerry (talk) 03:00, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Isaac Saul for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Isaac Saul is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isaac Saul (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:01, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Use of footnotes at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isaac Saul (2nd nomination)

Hi - just a good faith comment/FYI - I added the template {{reflist talk}} to your comment. If you use citations/references in a comment in a discussion it's best to use this template, that way the references will be viewable with your comment and not appear in other comments or elsewhere the discussion is transcluded. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 05:10, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I didn't know! Mover of molehillsmove me 14:10, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Isaac Saul

On 18 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Isaac Saul, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that journalist Isaac Saul was named as one of the 16 people who had the greatest influence in the 2016 U.S. election? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Isaac Saul 2. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Isaac Saul), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Mover_of_molehills"