User talk:Moonover

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

You can leave a message on my talk page.Vincelord (talk) 16:46, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Editing with a possible conflict of interest

Information icon Hello, Moonover. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.--SamHolt6 (talk) 18:00, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julian Perez (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Declining; the subject has released a number of EPs, and so likely meets WP:NMUSIC, but for the moment this article is unfit for the mainspace. The citation of Wikipedia must be removed, and more content must be added to explain why Perez has a claim to encyclopedic notability. In addition, more in-depth, reliable sources must be cited; listings like the Discogs pages are not considered to be in-depth.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SamHolt6 (talk) 18:02, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Moonover! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SamHolt6 (talk) 18:02, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Julian Perez concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Julian Perez, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Julian Perez

Hello, Moonover. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Julian Perez".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:46, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julian Perez (Dj/Producer) (July 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:
This is the English-language Wikipedia; we can only accept articles written in the English language. Please provide a high-quality English-language translation of your submission. Have you visited the Wikipedia home page? You can probably find a version of Wikipedia in your language.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Gusfriend (talk) 11:47, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julian Perez (Dj/Producer) (July 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lil-unique1 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The article is largely unsourced by reliable sources. Per WP:BIO, there needs to be establishment of a subject's notability. There is also inter-wikipedia sourcing - information on the English wikipedia cannot be sourced from international versions of WIki.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
>> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 15:33, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julian Perez (Dj/Producer) (July 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TipsyElephant were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
There are a couple sources that look half decent, but they are hidden among the clutter and I'm not convinced of the reliability when it comes to Trommel Music. Websites like Discogs and Wikipedia are user generated content and should not be referenced. Many of the references are also trivial mentions and should be removed (if it doesn't contain a paragraph about Perez it won't contribute to notability so get rid of it). It's also worth noting that interviews generally do not contribute to notability because the information comes directly from the person. Do not resubmit this draft until you've cleaned up some of the clutter. For instance, there is serious overkill when it comes to referencing. There should almost never be more than three sources for a single statement and currently there are ten sources for a single statement at the end of the Biography section. There is also quite a bit of puffery and the prose is clearly not neutral. TipsyElephant (talk) 13:36, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
TipsyElephant (talk) 13:36, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reply at Requests for undeletion

Hello, Moonover. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion.
Message added 14:20, 5 July 2022 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

North America1000 14:20, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Julian Perez moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Julian Perez, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mooonswimmer 13:31, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julian Perez (November 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 15:33, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Julian Perez

Hello, Moonover. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Julian Perez".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:57, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Moonover"