User talk:Mikilnarayani1

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

January 2020

Information icon Hello, I'm UA3. An edit that you recently made to Abu Dhabi seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! UA3 (talk) 18:19, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jerk (physics)

I reverted this edit of yours. In nearly every case, the wording you chose was worse than what was there before. In many cases, your wording was outright wrong. If you don't understand the difference between force and energy, you ought not to be editing physics articles. I find it hard to imagine how you arrived at many of your choices. It's like you went through the article with a thesaurus, replacing words with synonyms without bothering to read and understand the sentences. --Srleffler (talk) 21:24, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This edit to Hill reaction had similar problems. "Reaction" and "response" are not synonyms in an article about a chemical reaction. Saying that something is "sent along the electron transport system" is not the same as saying that it is "sent along with the electron transport system". A "chemical potential gradient" is not the same thing as a "potential chemical gradient", etc. Copyediting for grammar and writing style is fine, but you have to actually understand what the text is saying first.

I did look at some of your edits to non-science articles, and they seemed better. Make sure you understand the text you're editing, and I think you'll do fine.--Srleffler (talk) 21:42, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Solid state drive vs hard disk drive, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 18:03, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Drewmutt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 02:03, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Mikilnarayani1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 02:03, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Information icon Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Solid-state drive. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 17:22, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mikilnarayani1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:Mikilnarayani1/sandbox/Mikil Narayani.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:13, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mikilnarayani1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Solid state drive vs hard disk drive".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:06, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]