User talk:MikePence2020

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

October 2016

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for WP:MEATPUPPETRY with User:Edmodo23. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Vanjagenije (talk) 14:40, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MikePence2020 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yo. I'm not the same person as my teacher. He offered me Xtra-credit for adding info to that page. I was rewarded 15 points on the most recent exam as a matter of fact. But I'm sorry about all this.

Decline reason:

Thank you for admitting your violation of WP:MEAT and your violation of WP:COI. However, that's grounds to leave you blocked indefinitely, not to consider lifting the block. Yamla (talk) 13:14, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

hgjhgjkhsf

Speedy deletion nomination of User:MikePence2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:MikePence2020, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:59, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mojo Hand (talk) 21:39, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


wait why am I blocked?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MikePence2020 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey I don't remember even making a user page for myself, I don't remember what that page even said. I was on an epic bender a few weeks ago. I didn't even realize I was blocked again until today.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:55, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MikePence2020 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not the VP elect of the US. I am not an impostor. I am here to create an encyclopedia and nothing else. I have useful information to share.

Decline reason:

I believe the first claim. Unfortunately your past conduct contradicts all the other claims. Huon (talk) 14:49, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MikePence2020 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey sorry to bother you all but our Indiana History class was assigned to add info to various "stub" pages pertaining to topics involving Allen County, Indiana. I realized I can't edit because my account is blocked on here. I have a choice, get unblocked and do the assignment or stay blocked and get an F. My grade is kinda depending on the moderators here...

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui 雲水 11:39, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Tough luck. Try explaining to your supervisor that you're unable to edit because you were blocked. We're here to maintain the integrity of the encyclopedia, not to help you with your grades. Huon (talk) 23:32, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I contacted my teacher and he told me to just make a new account and just not get blocked, so I guess I'll just do that. Problem solved!
Please refer to Wikipedia:Multiple accounts. Creating multiple accounts, particularly to block evade, is also not allowed on Wikipedia. Just be reminded that your IP address or IP address range may be blocked if such abuse continues. --JustBerry (talk) 04:45, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MikePence2020 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey, my teacher just got fired for this. Some idiot from Wikipedia reported him to our school superintendant. He didn't know what was going to happen. The school administration demanded the usernames of all the students in the class who made accounts to edit for the assignment and saw that most of them vandalized various pages, and most of their edits from the assignment got reverted anyway. All I want to know is who reported him, because I feel responsible for this.

Decline reason:

I think we're done here. TPA revoked per below. To be blunt, stop wasting our time RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:59, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yeah, that totally sounds like a thing that happened. I believe you 100%. Since I've already dealt with one of your "appeals" earlier I'll leave it to another admin to nuke the above template, but in the meantime, I think we can all agree that no-one's getting any benefit from your messages here, so I'm removing talkpage access. Good luck with your course! Yunshui 雲水 16:55, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:MikePence2020"