User talk:Meingott7

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Meingott7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

WIKIPEDIA IS A COMMUNIST WEBSITE. THEY DELETE THINGS THAT WILL HURT THEIR REPUTATION. IT MUST BE STOPPED!!! PROTEST PROTEST PROTEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Decline reason:

Troll. -- Yamla 23:32, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A tag has been placed on Michael Tolbert, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mr Stephen 22:59, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. J Milburn 23:03, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Celithemis 23:10, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Please stop

Please Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. Mr Stephen 23:11, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked for disrupting Wikipedia with silly articles for a period of 24 hours. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Cowman109^Talk 23:15, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

When you return, please try contributing positively instead of creating these pointless articles. Thank you. Cowman109^Talk 23:15, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Nicole Vaidišová

First, when you move a page you are responsible for fixing all the double redirects that the move may cause. Second, why did you move the page anyway? There is nothing to say that she has changed her name. Right now there is one minor news report that she has filed papers to be wed. Even if she does get married there is nothing to say that she will change her name. If she does then would be the time to think about moving it. What you did was disruptive. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 03:40, 16 December 2007 (UTC)