User talk:MaxwellWinnie102
Welcome!
Hello, MaxwellWinnie102, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Luis Garavito did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Introduction tutorial
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. Aoidh (talk) 20:42, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
It says his punishment was 853 years but in the other place it says 1,853 years so which is it? MaxwellWinnie102 (talk) 20:46, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
No it says on the top and next to sentencing that it’s 853 years but lower it’s 1,853 years. MaxwellWinnie102 (talk) 01:46, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
I know I’m confused too. MaxwellWinnie102 (talk) 01:47, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- On your sponge edits, please discuss with other WikiProject editors before proceeding (if one of your edits is reverted, it is up to you to start a discussion per the WP:BRD policy - Boldly insert (you did that already) - Revert (that's happened too) - start Discussion and obtain consensus). It seems that the consensus (I recall similar issues of dating with other claimed finds of early fossils) is not to accept such controversial early dates until zoologists have reviewed the findings and agreed they are at least likely, i.e. we don't go on just one (primary) report but we wait for a (secondary) review article. Hope this makes sense. All the best and Happy Christmas, Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:41, 25 December 2021 (UTC)