User talk:Mark viking

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

What do you think about this? Similar aritcle and my BEFORE is showing just mentions in passing? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:33, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't performed a BEFORE style search on other members of the Z80 family. There is some coverage, e.g. [1]. I consider author Al Williams (of Dr. Dobbs fame) as being a reliable source for this sort of topic. But it seems clear that a merge of verifiable bits and redirect could be a reasonable alternative to deletion for this processor as well. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 20:39, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Following some links I saw your comment at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 April 25#Category:Chapman & Hall books. As per you Springer and World Scientific are the best publishers for math and physics. As such I wonder f you know the same for biology and chemistry? Solomon7968 14:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For graduate and professional level biology books, I don't think there are any publishers that are as dominant and well thought of as Springer is for Mathematics. It seems a more heterogeneous publishing field. The university-associated publishers like OUP are still well-regarded in biology. For biology journal publishing, Nature, Science, and Cell Press are considered top tier. Medical publishing is a whole separate ecosystem with its own publishers. I don't know much about chemistry publishers. I know that The American Chemical Society and The Royal Society of Chemistry are major publishers with top journals, but I don't know how well-regarded they are for their book publishing. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 18:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]