User talk:Managerarc/Archive 2
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Mallika Sherawat
Hi, Need your help to understand it better. I have uploaded a new pic from Bollywoodhungama http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mallika_at_ShaadiSepehle_audiorelease.jpg Now how should I get a OTRS approval? Thanks for your understanding
chandu 18:55, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Partner (2007 film)
As you know, someone keeps messing with Partner (2007 film). They are using diff IP addresses too. Can we semi-protect the article to deal with that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bollyjeff (talk • contribs) 22:31, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
I don't understand what you mean by citations
Sorry I don't understand. Can you please explain it to me in more detail Wiki id2(talk) 12:46, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
aryan vaid page
hello. i am writing due to the fact that my husband and I are both trying to keep the changes we make on his page stay. We are very upset that you keep adding the Anapuma Verma's information all over my husband's page. Last night he changed it from his IP address and today I changed it from my own. Please be respectful of our changes. Thank you. Alexandra Copley —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.101.95.236 (talk) 13:06, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
How does my addtion to pages lead to spamming?
I have been trying to add more information about the movies such as providing reviews and other information about the movie. The page does mentions about the plot but not about how the critics rate the movie. I tried to provide that information in the external links. How does that lead to promotions/spamming? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lakhotiaatul (talk • contribs) 16:13, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Dabangg cleanup
Hi, I have posted gross revenue of dabangg as 31.5 Cr INR domestic, collected from sources http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Dabangg-earns-145cr-on-Day-1-beats-3-Idiots/articleshow/6538986.cms and http://navbharattimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/6539613.cms.Make total collection to 14.5+17 = 31.5 Cr. Please add it to wikipedia(Gross section of movie). Another thing- Film budget is 42 Cr(12 Cr spent on marketing)http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/%3Ci%3Edabangg-%3Ci%3Ealreadyhit-say-exhibitors/407654/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.195.100.255 (talk) 08:09, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 16:00, 19 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Reply to your message
I did enter the name of the reference in the last section : External links.
You can check the link there. Infact, the information you are writing is completely false, including date of birth, body of work etc. Hiding some of her films, and highlighting other insignificant work shows that you are the one who is not using reliable sources.
Please avoid such behavior. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hello5678 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Reply to your message
It is a reliable reference. Infact, what you have written is totally false. You probably have not seen the list of movies she has worked in. You might be in her PR TEAM, and so it may be your job to hide her B-grade work, but that doesn't mean the truth should not be told to readers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hello5678 (talk • contribs) 18:45, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Reply to your attempts to message me continuously
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Payal Rohatgi. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- This goes for you. You have been trying to put a biased view of Payal Rohatgi, by hiding her sleazy films and adding a wrong date of birth.
The content I have put is completely true. We know her real date of birth, we also know the exact details of the films she worked on, complete with release date and box office collections of those films.
Any attempt by you to portray a non-realistic, false, biased image of Payal Rohatgi would result in you getting BLOCKED on Wikipedia. Learn to stick with the Truth. Something you have probably not heard of. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hello5678 (talk • contribs) 13:24, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Reply to your STUPID message
Your msg reeks of immaturity and an attempt to spread a false image of your PR client, Payal Rohatgi. The link is a reliable source and YOU DONT DECIDE WHAT IS RELIABLE AND WHAT IS NOT. IN OTHER WORDS, DO WHAT YOU WANT AND YES, DO REMEMBER NOT TO EDIT MORE THAN 3 TIMES IN A 24HR PERIOD. THE RULE APPLIES TO STUPID PEOPLE LIKE YOU. OK ? NOW READ THAT AGAIN. AND I CAN EDIT AS MANY TIMES AS I WANT, FROM DIFFERENT IPS AND DIFFERENT ACCOUNTS. THIS TIME YOU ARE NOT GETTING AWAY WITH A BIASED, NON-NEUTRAL ATTEMPT TO PORTRAY A SLEAZY ACTRESS AS A YOUNG, DECENT ONE. JUST, NOT HAPPENING HERE. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hello5678 (talk • contribs) 19:34, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Read your reply and reread it again and again. I have posted reliable sources that show box-office collections and release dates of her B-grade sleazy films. In case you want to continue, then maybe a media article in the papers will show how her PR team is trying to falsify facts about her life and her work. Now, this is a PROPER warning. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hello5678 (talk • contribs) 07:59, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Undoing of Peepli Live Movie Review citation.
Managerarc,
I came to know that you have undone the review citation added by me to Peepli Live page. Well just to add the credibility of the website. FilmiTadka is financially strong and investor backed movie portal. website gets the news directly from various movie publicists handling the media departments of production houses across India.
FilmiTadka is indexed by Google News, parent company of website is also member of various media and journalist associations of India.
Website is absolutely on the same lines as of ApunKaChoice and Bollywood Hungama, what kind of credibility do they have? ApunKaChoice on the other hand doesn't even have contact details.
Ayush Agrawal 07:04, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Yes I am associated with the website, but adding citation is in no way spam, I myself have been a user of Wikipedia since last 8 years and respect the policies. Anyway thanks for pointing out a forum where I can raise this topic, I'll do that.
Ayush Agrawal 08:56, 18 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Agrawal.ayush (talk • contribs)
Hi Managerarc. I've long been an admirer of your fantastic work you do here for Bollywood films. I've recently made a few changes to Dabangg article with some logical edit summaries and reliable references. I'll really appreciate if you've a look into it. Thanks a bunch. Regards, 115.167.92.76 (talk) 17:44, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.
If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles 05:09, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
I believe you are well aware of WP:3RR. You appear to have violated it at Sonam Kapoor, during the last 24 hous. Even though I presume your edits were good faith, please do not edit war. Instead of reverting, discuss it on the article's talk page. мαуαηк·αвнιѕнєк talk · contribs 13:49, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Review my edits of Guzaarish
Please review my edits of Guzaarish. I removed some material as I felt it was against Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(film). Also removed what I felt was non NPOV material. I also think that the article has excessive material which needs to be purged. (Like the special screening). Please also check the critical response section. I think User:Srk121srk is giving the section a very positive slant and in general the style is unusual.
Mallumax (talk) 14:50, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
edits of I Hate Luv Stories
On I Hate Luv Storys, a citation was added from Deepa Garimella that you deemed best removed (your reason was "not a notable review site"). I do not mean to sound rude, but Deepa Garimalla has done over 300 film reviews over years (http://www.fullhyd.com/search.php?type=movies&qs=Deepa+Garimella&qsf=Reviewer&sorted=ReviewerRating&sorder=DESC&showing=B&searchtype=advanced), and you can judge the quality for yourself. Also, fullhyd.com has close to 4,000 film reviews (http://www.fullhyd.com/movies/theatres_showtimings_hyderabad/N) in its archives, done over more than a decade. Again, please read a (well-sampled) cross-section of the reviews to judge the quality for yourself. Thank you.
Help
Hi. .Hw abt adding a lock for protecting unnecessay bad and filthy edits abt Asin in her profile in wiki. . .I dont knw how to add a lock tats y asking u fr help. . .Hope u consider ma request. . .Thank u. . . —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vijay536 (talk • contribs) 15:34, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Sushmita Sen image had copyrights. There is website name in middle. Sorry, rules are rules. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starking007 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 16 December 2010 (UTC)