User talk:M keshe

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Gravitation. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. The way, the truth, and the light 09:03, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. The way, the truth, and the light 09:19, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Regarding your post

Hi
I think that the problem might be that you didn't reference any sources not directly related to yourself. Wikipedia has a strict policy towards original research; that is any research not already published. As Wikipedia is supposed to be an encyclopedia, it can only contain information already published; and only if it is verifiable. If you want your theory to be included in the encyclopedia, I'd suggest that you start it in your userspace, for example here, write it up properly with external sources (not using only keshe technologies as the only source), give an indication that it's notable, and then move it into the regular articlespace. You can start it directly in the normal namespace if you want, for example at Keshe theory, but out there it's likely to be deleted more or less at once if it doesn't conform to the Wikipedia policies. Once you've written that article, and assuming that it hasn't been deleted, you can begin to make references to it in other articles as well.

All this might seem like very much work; but as this is a fairly new theory, with few online references, it's likely to be checked and deleted if the article is unable to prove that it's notable through independent sources. Hope this helps, let me know if you have more questions. Bjelleklang - talk Bug Me 12:38, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt that any patent publications would qualify as enough proof of notability, as there is a huge number of patents that just isn't notable in any way. But if you can find citations from a notable scientific journal, then you should be okay.
PS: Always remember to sign posts on talkpages using four tildes ~~~~ :) Bjelleklang - talk Bug Me 16:24, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Although you are getting closer, I'd advise you to read up on a few policies, as well as having a look at Help:Wikitext and Category:Wikipedia style guidelines for some tips as to how to organize and structure the article. Placing Notable at the top of an article doesn't mean anything; the article it self has to establish notability through independent and reliable sources if you want to avoid having it deleted. Also have a look at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, as the article looks quite one-sided as it reads right now. Try to avoid linking to keshetechnologies.com, as this doesn't indicate notability in any way; the idea is that when a subject is notable, someone else will have written enough about it to be used as a source or reference. Hope this helps, if not don't hesitate to ask again. But as I have little knowledge within physics, I'd also advise you to seek assistance at Portal talk:Physics. And please remember to sign your posts (although not your articles) by using four tildes ~~~~. Bjelleklang - talk Bug Me 11:39, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please sign messages when you post to talkpages (use 4 tildes (~~~~)), as it makes it easier for the recipient to find out who are writing. If you feel that the page is ok, the logon, and go ahead and move it (use the move tab on the top of the screen). However remember that the article has to conform to policies to avoid getting deleted. Bjelleklang - talk Bug Me 12:21, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]