User talk:Localhistorian2024
Welcome!
Hi Localhistorian2024! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! SuperMarioOdyssy101 (talk) 04:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
May 2024
Hello, I'm Gaia Octavia Agrippa. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Paula Vennells have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 13:13, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- I was merely following the statement made in the London Gazette. Perhaps a word closer to the London Gazette would have been "disreputable". If you feel that the London Gazette has mis-reported, please take up this issue with the King. Localhistorian2024 (talk) 13:22, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Gaia Octavia Agrippa. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Paula Vennells seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 13:24, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- I have stated a source for my change and that is the London Gazette. You have not stated a source for your changes. Localhistorian2024 (talk) 13:30, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Paula Vennells shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. BusterD (talk) 13:46, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the clarification. I have added my comments on the issue to the Talk page of the entry on Paula Vennells. Localhistorian2024 (talk) 08:31, 26 May 2024 (UTC)