User talk:LetsWalkTheDinosaurs

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

January 2024

Information icon Hello, I'm TheEpTic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Philippine Airlines—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. TheEpTic (talk) 05:32, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at PAL Express. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: PAL Express was changed by LetsWalkTheDinosaurs (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861978 on 2024-01-06T12:25:03+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as what you did to Philippine Airlines or you will be block from editing. Please be aware that your contributions can lead to WP:EDITWAR and blocked if you'll continue to edit with your disruptive behavior. Thanks! Cornerstone2.0 (talk) 15:56, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Philippine Airlines. Cornerstone2.0 (talk) 08:28, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (PAL Express, Philippine Airlines fleet, and Philippine Airlines) for a period of 31 hours for repetitive insertion without discussion. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  BusterD (talk) 14:35, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 07:01, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, LetsWalkTheDinosaurs! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 07:01, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Information icon There is a discussion regarding with your edits at Philippine Airlines, please participate this issue on talk page to prevent edit war. Thank you! Cornerstone2.0 (talk) 15:10, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Cornerstone2.0 (talk) 17:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring and persistent addition of poorly-sourced and unsourced content on Philippine Airlines fleet, Philippine Airlines, and other articles. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:12, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LetsWalkTheDinosaurs (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I just wanted to show people the truth LetsWalkTheDinosaurs (talk) 03:54, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural. Block has expired. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:44, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • So far as I can see, this is the first talk page edit User:LetsWalkTheDinosaurs has ever made on Wikipedia. Hello there! We can see you are somewhat dedicated to your version of certain fleet details. However, we require our coverage to be facts or analysis based on reliable sources, not on your claim as "the truth". Do you understand why we would prefer that from contributors? Often a user has a specific area of interest and we welcome that content-area interest in helping sourcing and context for those new to the field. However, we always prefer citation using reliable source independent of the subject. Why have you been edit warring instead of having civil discussion? BusterD (talk) 15:21, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]