User talk:Lesikar

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome!

Hello, Lesikar, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you enjoy it here and decide to stay. Here is some information that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here, and being a Wikipedian. Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Additionally, the sandbox is available if you wish to test your editing skills.

All in all, good luck, have fun, and be bold! SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:31, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy, I went ahead and restored the Talk:Global warming article which you seem to have accidentally blanked. Certain browsers have been known to do this from time to time. To restore a page, click on the history tab, and then the date/time of the edit you wish to restore. Once the version is open, click "edit this page," ignore teh warning about editing a prior version of a page, and click "Save page" (with no modifications to the article). An edit summary saying "revert to ..." (or "rv") is usually good. I hope this is what you intended. Let me know if there is anything I can help with (just leave a note on teh bottom of my talk page, User_talk:TeaDrinker. Thanks and welcome to Wikipedia! --TeaDrinker 08:47, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of Style pages

When editing articles that are part of the Wikipedia Manual of Style, please be careful that you avoid making changes to the actual guidelines listed on the page; Manual of Style pages need to represent the community consensus among Wikipedia editors as a whole, so while you're free to edit the page for minor issues (spelling, grammar or phrasing, etc.), please do not try to add, remove, or change guidelines from a MoS page without first consulting its corresponding Talk page to see what other editors think of your changes; otherwise, you may find your edits being reverted by other editors who disagree with the changes. --Stratadrake 10:05, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies

Hi. I would like to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change (survey described here). If interested, please get in touch via my talkpage or email me Encyclopaedia21 (talk) 17:58, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]