User talk:Legendary T.H.U.G.

1. Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. —Khoikhoi 19:28, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

You need to show nuff respect to the thugz. Legendary T.H.U.G. 19:29, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

1. Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. —Khoikhoi 19:32, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

You sayin' givin much props to tha THUGZ is nonsense? Please read Thug article. Legendary T.H.U.G. 19:34, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

1. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Khoikhoi 21:41, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

2. 

   This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Khoikhoi 16:06, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

You need to explain how what I've done is vandalism. You aren't discussing this civilly, and you're coming across as a hysterical anti-thug hater. Legendary T.H.U.G. 16:08, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

I would like to see an explanation from Legendary T.H.U.G why adding the category thugs is ok and necessary. Otherwise, I am inclined to view it as vandalism as well.--YellowLeftHand 17:52, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

One might view at as somewhat informal, but the same could be said of Category:Eccentrics, not to mention many other categories on Wikipedia. It's a useful signifier to people, letting them know who is and is not a tru thug. Legendary T.H.U.G. 17:55, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

I've looked and it doesn't appear that Thugs is a Wiki category (not saying I think it shouldn't be). --YellowLeftHand 17:10, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

An anti-rap hater deleted it. Legendary T.H.U.G. 17:11, 26 May 2006 (UTC)