User talk:KylieTastic/Archive 2024

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Submitting my draft

Hi Kylie,

I hope you are doing well. I noticed you declined my article about a town in the Philippines called Ambasing. The thing is, you may know the word "Ambasing" is a meme word, and the town happens to be called that. I am trying to get this article published so that the article will become a meme. If you are able to get this article published, I won't be able to thank you enough. I will be sure to give you, KylieTastic, your deserved credit for your contribution to this project. Anyway, thank you for reading this! Have a Happy New Year!

Thanks, Zeus2934 Zeus2934 (talk) 23:30, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a space wherein you can create a meme. Please try a social media platform instead. Wikipedia isn't a social media platform. --Hammersoft (talk) 23:41, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
But this is not a meme. This is a real place. Zeus2934 (talk) 02:32, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
@Zeus2934 I'm not an administrator so cannot see the original of Draft:Ambasing, but as it was deleted as "G3: Vandalism" it was clearly not a serious attempt. The new version is unsourced - as no "Trust me bro" is not acceptable. Assuming it is the place at 17°04'17.4"N 120°53'55.8"E it at least appears to exist. However even if it was "famous for being the hometown of the popular meme character Dreamy Bull" that is also of no value here. If you want to write about Ambasing fine, but it needs reliable sources for all claims. KylieTastic (talk) 10:55, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Notability Guidelines needs to move away from Journalists

Why are you not using the talk feature before declining drafts?

What is the notable number? Do I need to bribe Journalists to get your attention? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raywalk (talk • contribs) 11:03, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

@Raywalk you submitted it for review so it was reviewed. The review response is "talking" to you giving you the feedback of what is required. As the decline notice says, all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). Your first two references for Meadow do not even mention Rupy let alone anything significant. Same for the third reference for JourneyMap. So that leaves you with one source which is not enough to show notability and also leaving most of the content not sourced. Adding things like "if this is not notable enough you (wikipedia) needs to state how many human customers are needed for notability." in the actual article is also not going to help. Wikipedia does not use numbers for notability, for instance many social media/YouTube accounts have millions of followers/subscribers but with nothing else are not notable by our policies and guidelines. Even if Wikipedia did use numbers as a metric your 300000+ owners would help an article for Meadow not Rupy. No you do not "need to bribe Journalists" as reliable sources do not have to be written by Journalists. KylieTastic (talk) 11:50, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
1) "Same for the third reference for JourneyMap" You seem to not understand how the world works, JourneyMap USED Rupy (https://github.com/search?q=repo%3ATeamJM%2Fjourneymap-legacy%20rupy&type=code). Without Rupy JouneyMap would not be the same.
2) Meadow uses Rupy and would not exist without it. If you do not trust the truth behind this statement from the person who made this then what does the word reliable mean?
3) Name one "reliable" source that is not a Journalist? Raywalk (talk) 12:17, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
@Raywalk, 1) The source you gave does not mention it. A link to show one project on GitHub uses another one is not notable. Not that notability is inherited anyway but as JourneyMap does not have an article either this is just a claim that one non notable project uses another. 2) Is just another unsourced claim - and no Wikipedia does not just trust what people claim is true - see Wikipedia:Verifiability 3) almost every book, journal and a huge number of websites. From your user talk page you appear to have been at this since at least 2011. Your have been linked to the key WP:Policies and guidelines such as Wikipedia:Notability, Wikipedia:Reliable sources multiple times. You may not like the way Wikipeida works, but this is how it currently works regardless. KylieTastic (talk) 12:58, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
1) Of course notability is inherited.
2) I'm the source, because I made it.
3) Those all cost money and energy. Raywalk (talk) 15:21, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

What sources are notable?

I understand why you declined Draft:Jillian Michaels (voice actor), IMDb seemed trustworthy until you told me that the information is fan-entered. So I wanted to ask if other sources would be notable, as they have given me the same information. Like Anime News Network, My Anime List, PeoplePill, etc. Would these sources other than fandoms be notable? MKsLifeInANutshell (talk) 14:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi MKsLifeInANutshell, IMDB used to be an OK source until every self promoter realized you can get away with ridiculous stuff now and over the last few years it's reliability outside of better known people and movies is not trustworthy. I've found self-promoters adding themselves to lots of fairly well known movies in minor roles and getting away with it. I don't know those off the top of my head, but often you can tell by the look and wording of sources if they are not reliable. Otherwise you can search for them on WP:RSPSOURCES and if not listed you can search if there is any historical discussion using WP:RSPMISSING. Saying that "My Anime List" sounded like user generated content and finding the site has a signup/login at the top also suggest it. For anime related sources try looking at Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Online reliable sources. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 16:56, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Request on 14:04:09, 4 January 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by AkashpantInnostax


AkashpantInnostax (talk) 14:04, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

@AkashpantInnostax no question, and article not improved. All new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS) KylieTastic (talk) 14:25, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

United States of Biafra

I have added multiple references to the article and also expanded the article United States of Biafra. You can kindly re-review. Olivia Harry (talk) 00:07, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

  • Olivia Harry sorry but to be fair to all submitters I don't review/re-review on request, I just pick new and old submissions at random or work on certain topics, so it may or may not be myself who reviews it next. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 09:27, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
    Ok. It's understandable Olivia Harry (talk) 15:07, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Manoj Dey

Hey, I saw you also just declined this – what do you make of it? There are more socks in the edit history than in my sock drawer! I thought they all came from the same farm, but looks like there are at least two farms involved, and I can't find a connection between either of them and the latest author. Any ideas? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:58, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

@DoubleGrazing yes just paid-for spam. I must admit I don't often get involved in thinking of submitters as farms, I just deal with the creations till they either stop or get blocked. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 17:10, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

A kitten for you!

GrubNotHere (talk) 16:54, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Denied article

I've noticed you denied my draft: List of storms named Phil. You stated that it needed sources, despite it being a disambiguation page. I think you made a mistake... ''Flux55'' (talk) 22:56, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi Flux55, I declined with a generic "fails notability" option but yes the current tag wording is really not correct for disambiguation pages - Sorry I should have noticed. Disambiguation pages normally require at least three entries to be deemed notable otherwise hat notes are usually used to link. Also as it is also only a secondary name for one of the articles it seems even more of a stretch. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 23:18, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Can I submit this draft for review?

Thank you for editing this: Draft:Mehdi Mirza Mehdi Tehrani. I have edited this article generally in accordance with Wikipedia's policies on biographies of living people. The text of this article is about 75% different from the previous article. I covered all the new sources according to the protocol and removed the less effective sources altogether. Fortunately, now the sources are independent of the topic and secondary. There are also English sources. Can I ask you to read and guide me if you have the opportunity and desire to see this draft? Does the article have the capacity to move to the main namespace so I can request a review? I mean, I understand your point of view as a professional editor. I know it is very important to you that drafts are reviewed fairly and in turn. Your opinion is very important to me. —Patricia (Talk) 14:07, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi Patricia Mannerheim, I can see you have updated since the last removal from main-space so yes if you are happy please do submit for review. To be fair to all submitters I don't review/re-review on request, I just pick new and old submissions at random or work on certain topics.It not the sort of topic I generally work on so I'll leave for one of the other reviewers with more interest/knowledge as the key thing you want to avoid is someone immediately taking it to Wp:AfD again. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 14:18, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi KylieTastic. So much thanks. it was helpful to me. Considering that 7 months had passed since the last revision and now the draft has been updated, should this TAG: {{info|crosswiki spam by Special:CentralAuth/Patricia Mannerheim, see wikidata:Q85975315. Previously deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mehdi Tehrani (2nd nomination).remain? Or Does the policy allow this tag to be removed? Best.—Patricia (Talk) 15:21, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi Patricia Mannerheim, firstly that notice is important for the reviewer to make sure they understand the reasons given in previous WP:AFD discussions. Secondly the general policy is that while in draft/AfC tags are not removed so reviewers and other editors know the history. It would obviously be removed if accepted. Also it should be noted that with was added by Johannnes89 who is a "global sysop" (admin) so if you thought that the note of "crosswiki spam by Special:CentralAuth/Patricia Mannerheim" was unfair you would need to talk to them about it. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 17:50, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Your answer was very informative for me. I am very pleased to meet you here. I will definitely follow your instructions. wish the best for you. —Patricia (Talk) 18:30, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi KylieTastic Let me thank you for the guidance you gave me about Draft:Mehdi Mirza Mehdi Tehrani. I spoke with Mr. Johannnes89 who is a "global sysop" (administrator) as you said. They were very reasonable and kind and removed the label themselves. I thank him. I updated the draft a lot and consulted with experienced editors and some managers.see this: here and here Currently, there are two detailed comments above the draft. I understand your terms and protocols. I would be very happy and honored if you have time or if you would like to take a look at this draft. Assuming good faith, I'll make it clear that I don't want to take up your valuable time, but I'd greatly appreciate your guidance and possibly your action.—Patricia (Talk) 16:32, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

why my article get declines

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sahil_nair 1shubhamchoudhary (talk) 15:36, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

@1shubhamchoudhary, all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). medium.com is almost never a reliable source - see WP:MEDIUM. KylieTastic (talk) 15:39, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
this is his instagram and al source https://www.startupindiamagazine.com/growth-story-of-sahil-nair/
https://www.crunchbase.com/person/sahil-nair
https://www.instagram.com/fashionwithsahil/?hl=en 1shubhamchoudhary (talk) 15:57, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Also not independent reliable sources KylieTastic (talk) 18:01, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Colpo grosso a Berlino

Dear @KylieTastic, could you explain what I could add to the article so that it can be made acceptable? Thank you so much, kind regards 14 novembre (talk) 19:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi @14 novembre, all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). Also see Wikipedia:Notability (films). Regards KylieTastic (talk) 19:51, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
@KylieTastic Thanks. I will look for such sources. Also, is the problem the same for Draft:Italy v North Macedonia (2022 FIFA World Cup qualification) and Draft:Il cielo è azzurro sopra Berlino? Many thanks and kind regards 14 novembre (talk) 19:54, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
@14 novembre I've not looked at Draft:Italy v North Macedonia (2022 FIFA World Cup qualification) but yes a single source on Draft:Il cielo è azzurro sopra Berlino is not enough to show notability so the same general notability standard applies (see WP:GNG). Regards KylieTastic (talk) 19:58, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Thank you very much 14 novembre (talk) 19:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

I just want to make an article to provide information about my creation, I didn't want to share my idea, just trying to inform people. Not sharing, just informing.

I just want to make an article to provide information about my creation, I didn't want to share my idea, just trying to inform people. Not sharing, just informing. Njnynun (talk) 19:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

That makes no sense at all! but still not the purpose of Wikipedia to share or "just inform" un-notable information KylieTastic (talk) 19:43, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
What I mean is that there is a difference between sharing an idea and informing: sharing is showing it off with the intent to do so, informing is showing it, but with the intent to educate about it, not just to show it off, to give others knowledge. Njnynun (talk) 19:46, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

So, in other words, I didn't want to show it off, I wanted to give knowledge

. Njnynun (talk) 19:47, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

I know Wikipedia is meant to give knowledge, that's exactly what I'm trying to do. Njnynun (talk) 19:48, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Njnynun, the applicable content guideline is Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Cullen328 (talk) 21:09, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
how could I make it fit the guidelines if possible? Njnynun (talk) 22:07, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

STOP rejecting my awesome article drafts and deleting my changes OMG, it's like u're stalking me STOP PLEASE

That's it, if I want to add Top Secret CIA information let me 😾, you're annoying Grrr meow meow (talk) 23:48, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Everybody will do that, it's not just her. In fact, we're only trying to give you tips on improve your article drafts so they will have a higher chance of getting accepted. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 01:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
What a total lack of surprise your already blocked by the time I saw this. KylieTastic (talk) 10:45, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

London Haydn Quartet

Hello @KylieTastic,

Thank you for the quick review of my draft article.

Can you share an example of a “reliable source” other than ones I provided already (the ensemble’s own web site, their recording label’s site, an independent news site, etc.)? I can (and may, for completeness) expand the list but want to be sure this isn’t a Sisyphean exercise before continuing.

The LHQ meets the standards outlined in Wikipedia:Notability (music) (4,5,6,7 for example) for inclusion.

For reference the Amadeus Quartet page does not provide significantly more supporting material for a similar (but now defunct) ensemble. Other examples abound.

Cordially,

Diligent Scribe (talk) 12:50, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

P.S. I not a shill for LHQ. Although I have listened to some of their recordings they are only one of several quartets specializing in historical performance techniques for the Classical repertoire. 38.7.155.244 (talk) 12:46, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi Diligent Scribe, for showing notability we look to independent reliable source so no to "the ensemble’s own web site, their recording label’s site" but yes to "independent news site". Generally we look for 3+ sources independent reliable sources with significant coverage for general notability. You sort of have 1.5 at the moment as the second source is quite short. As for Wikipedia:Notability (music) first note that the criteria it says "may be notable if they meet at least one of the following criteria" and the General notability guideline is still the key criteria. As for Criteria you say they pass - #4: unfortunately I can't read all of the first source but the second does not mention concert tours. #5: the current text only talks about one of their albums. #6: this is normally interpreted as them having there own articles and nothing in the text indicates any of them are "independently notable musicians", #7: I see nothing in the current text to indicate this. As for Amadeus Quartet yes many existing articles are sub standard and why it is tagged as needing more verification. It was created in 2003 so before all the current Policies and guidelines. These old sub standard articles need improvement or deletion rather than being used to justify adding more of the same. Also googling "Amadeus Quartet" some of the first sources are the Royal College of Music and Britannica while googling "London Haydn Quartet" returns there own website, the labels website and social media which is always an indication of a less notable subject. See if you can find another couple of independent reliable sources with significant coverage and if so update and re-submit. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 14:25, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Warning

Hello... please when changing any edits....give reasons for changing them.Next time you try it, you will be block.be warned. Jutos222 (talk) 14:49, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

@Jutos222 assuming your talking about Joseph Ayo Babalola and/or Bisi Komolafe I did give an edit summary while you did not - so do watch out for the WP:BOOMERANG. KylieTastic (talk) 18:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Deuce Mayne

Hello KylieTastic. Thank you for your feedback, I appreciate you leading me in the right direction. I have updated my article & added multiple sources to reference. Can you move this article from draft to mainspace. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Indie.expo (talk • contribs) 20:20, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Indie.expo the article is submitted waiting review. Sorry but to be fair to all submitters I don't review/re-review on request, I just pick new and old submissions at random or work on certain topics, so it may or may not be myself who reviews it next. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 21:34, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Shaikh Burhanuddin Post Graduate College for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shaikh Burhanuddin Post Graduate College is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaikh Burhanuddin Post Graduate College until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Worldbruce (talk) 19:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Bradford Salem

Hi, I am new to Wikipedia and want to create a page for Bradford Salem RFC, I am trying to basis it on the page of Bradford and Bingley Rugby Club Salem1924 (talk) 13:52, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi Salem1924, so far User:Salem1924/sandbox only has an infobox with no main article content or any sources. Note that all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). So I would start by looking for 3+ such sources and then if you do start writing the article based on what is in those sources. If you have any questions on editing the Wikipedia:Teahouse is there get get help from lost of experienced editors. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 14:38, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
thank you for helping with a draft. made it look much better and much easier to read. Donnatello111 (talk) 19:04, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

"That" IP

Thanks for CSD tagging the attack pages. Darn these IP's don't quit do they? Perhaps we should get a rev-del on Liz's talk page? Good day! Bingobro (Chat) 13:11, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Hey Bingobro, yes some people I just can't even being to understand :/ - all we can do is get the idiots blocked and clean up. I'm sure Liz with rev-del if she wants, but my guess is she'll just ignore them. Tagging it for clean up would just highlight the now removed issue and some vandals would get a kick out of that. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 13:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

CaptainDoozle continues to vandalize

CaptainDoozle continues to vandalize. Please block him. 24.212.226.91 (talk) 17:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

I'm not an admin... but they are now blocked. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 18:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Thank you message for Love is Blind Season 6

Thanks for all your help about Love is Blind Season 6! I could've done it without you! 47.55.237.217 (talk) 11:33, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Submission declined

I want to know why my company information submission was declined. I just provided our company information on wikipedia page and there are no false information. Dr. Calcium SEAN LEE (talk) 22:31, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

@Dr. Calcium SEAN LEE this is why editing with a Conflict of interest is strongly discouraged. It was both a copyright violation and promotional. Wikipedia does not care what you think of yourself but what other independent reliable sources say. Also article must not have copyright violations and written from a Neutral point of view. KylieTastic (talk) 22:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

About Draft:Law Reform Commission of Mauritius - it would appear that the WP:COPYVIO content from a now deleted version of this draft was inadvertently added into its live version

@M.Shaseeb, Jimfbleak, TheBritinator, Broc, and KylieTastic:

The content in question appears to be a paper in a scholarly journal (the title of the journal, its DOI, and the paper's date I have not been able to identify) hosted at Victoria University of Wellington's website here.

19 Feb 2024 version

(diff) 23:50, February 19, 2024 . . TheBritinator (talk | contribs | block) 16,634 bytes (Declining submission: v - Submission is improperly sourced (AFCH))
(diff) 22:36, February 19, 2024 . . Jimfbleak (talk | contribs | block) m 16,323 bytes (Jimfbleak moved page Draft:Shaseeb to Draft:Law Reform Commission of Mauritius: Misspelled)
(diff) 22:29, February 19, 2024 . . M.Shaseeb (talk | contribs | block) 16,323 bytes (Submitting using AfC-submit-wizard)
(diff) 22:25, February 19, 2024 . . Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs | block) m 16,153 bytes (Bot: Adding AfC template (Task 15))
(diff) 22:20, February 19, 2024 . . M.Shaseeb (talk | contribs | block) 16,127 bytes (-- Draft creation using the WP:Article wizard --) Tag: possible autobiography or conflict of interest

5 March 2024 version

curprev  06:36, March 5, 2024‎ KylieTastic talk contribs block‎  10,959 bytes −57‎  - rollback: 1 editundothank
curprev  04:59, March 5, 2024‎ Broc talk contribs block‎  11,016 bytes +100‎  Requesting speedy deletion (CSD G12). undothank Tag: Twinkle
curprev  03:23, March 5, 2024‎ M.Shaseeb talk contribs block‎  10,916 bytes +191‎  Submitting using AfC-submit-wizard undothank
curprev  03:23, March 5, 2024‎ M.Shaseeb talk contribs block‎  10,725 bytes +10,725‎  -- Draft creation using the WP:Article wizard -- thank
KylieTastic talk contribs block‎  10,959 bytes −57‎  - rollback: 1 editundothank
curprev  04:59, March 5, 2024‎ Broc talk contribs block‎  11,016 bytes +100‎  Requesting speedy deletion (CSD G12). undothank Tag: Twinkle
curprev  03:23, March 5, 2024‎ M.Shaseeb talk contribs block‎  10,916 bytes +191‎  Submitting using AfC-submit-wizard undothank
curprev  03:23, March 5, 2024‎ M.Shaseeb talk contribs block‎  10,725 bytes +10,725‎  -- Draft creation using the WP:Article wizard -- thank

It would appear to me that the 06:36, March 5 version of the draft (a version of Draft:Law Reform Commission of Mauritius) somehow re-included the text of the 22:29, February 19, 2024 deleted version.

Interim proposal

  • It would appear to me that a "least worse solution" would appear to be to WP:ROLLBACK and the draft to its 03:23, March 5, 2024 version (a version of Draft:Law Reform Commission of Mauritius) when the body text of the article was simply blank and the draft article's title was simply "Law Reform Commission of Mauritius" and WP:REVDEL the subsequent inadvertent copyvios.

If the 5 March 2024 draft has been deleted since I wrote this, I hope this has been useful as a summary of what happened there. These things happen.


Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 10:01, 5 March 2024 (UTC) Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 10:01, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

@Shirt58 all I did was remove the start of comment to make the content clearer. My understanding is that there is no difference in the copyright-violation state based on if you can see it or not, just that it exists and can be viewed. Is this not why we have too REVDEL rather than just remove parts of it and hide it in the history? I had actually meant to edit out the worst of the copyvios and submit a REVDEL then changed my mind and decided to see what the result of the G12 was. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 10:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Draft: Francsico R Adriano Sr.

Hello. That draft is not my work. I submitted it at request of User:Abehonest who posted at the Help Desk. I advised that editor that it was likely to be declined and needed to be improved. Please inform them. Thanks. Cullen328 (talk) 10:52, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi Cullen328, as soon as I saw your name as AFCH posted the notice I backtracked, edited the submit, and re-reviewed so they got the notice. Note, I find the easiest way to submit for someone else is to use the AFHC tool that has a submit option built in. It allows you to submit on behalf of the creator, last submitter or someone else. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 11:01, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your review. Francisco R Adriano (Filipino) was one of the first class of graduates of the Philippine Military Academy, Graduated with Honors / was given the Presidential Saber. He fought protecting his country was decorated and spoke out against President Marcos's dictatorship. The creator of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Philippine_Military_Academy_alumni included Adriano in the listing but there is no link to his Wikipedia as that is being created now here. I was able to find 2 other press listing https://philippinediaryproject.com/tag/francisco-adriano/ and https://philippinediaryproject.com/1941/06/17/june-17-1941/. Given the Philippines was destroyed during the war many news references were burnt in the ashes and could NOT be salvaged. I don't think you should use the number of press links standard set for first world countries as for 3rd world. Please reconsider. Thanks. Abehonest (talk) 07:21, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi @Abehonest, unfortunately many subjects that would be notable can not get articles because the sources never did or no longer exist. I have often tried to find sources for subjects and failed. However a fundamental part of Wikipedia is that information is sourced and that there are enough to show notability. The fact that someone (and not the creator as you claim) added them to List of Philippine Military Academy alumni with no clear source does not help. Also just being an alumni of a place does not make you any more notable. As it stands you have three sources that are all just passing mentions, so fail to show notabilty. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 20:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
@KylieTasticWell Noted. Does receiving the Presential Saber and the fact he became a Colonel provide notability? There are not many who achieve similar accolades and positions. Thanks. Abehonest (talk) 07:23, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
@Abehonest their are some awards that are enough to show notability however as there appears to be no Presidential Saber. However, maybe it's just that rare and special. It may be worth asking at more open venues to get more input form others - possibly at Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines or the Wikipedia:Teahouse. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 09:52, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Do you know any way I could make my draft eligible again?

I don’t want this page going to waste, do you know what I could do? Cappyz (talk) 20:49, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

As was posted on the first three decline notices articles require significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability. You have failed to find one let alone multiple. Some subjects are just not notable. KylieTastic (talk) 20:54, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Understandable, welp that’s it. My draft is done. Cappyz (talk) 20:56, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
@Cappyz do note that some subjects could be notable (in the general sense) but just do not have the sources to qualify for an article. Unfortunately writing new articles is considered one of the hardest things to do here. Even some who have been around for years get articles deleted. Many of us have subjects we would like to see articles on but fail to find the sources, so your far from alone. If at sometime in the future people write about the game it will get an article. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 21:06, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Well thank you for reassuring me. Cappyz (talk) 21:23, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

San Diego International Law Journal

Hi Kyle!

I incorporated the changes to the Draft: San Diego International Law Journal page snd learned a lot about about notability and secondary sources in the interim.

Thank you for your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tech Bytez MD (talk • contribs) 04:14, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Shorban Empire

Hello KylieTastic, I see that you have rejected my article, over a week ago. Please note that I am not a troll, and I didn't mean to submit the article for review. This was an accident on my part. Is it possible for me to have this article published in the future, if I edit it, add more information, sources etc.?

Thanks, KeymasterOne KeymasterOne (talk) 15:54, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

@KeymasterOne Wikipedia is an encyclopedia of notable subjects - it is not for things you made up. KylieTastic (talk) 16:12, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
It wasn't just made up - it is a concept that has existed since 2017. There is quite some info on it. There is also a website about this, if you want me to send you it. KeymasterOne (talk) 14:59, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
@KeymasterOne a google for "Shorban Empire" says it is made up and non notable. KylieTastic (talk) 15:07, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
What do you mean? Can you tell me where you are getting this information from Google? KeymasterOne (talk) 16:49, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
@KeymasterOne you don't know what googling something is? this returns a X account, a Disboard listing for a discord server, a YouTube video from 4 days ago, etc so nothing of any note. The website for this is apparently https://sites.google.com/s207.org/shorbanempire - so just a google sites website. SO basically it's just something made up for fun and not a topic for an encyclopedia. KylieTastic (talk) 17:23, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Did you even read the whole website KeymasterOne (talk) 17:56, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
@KeymasterOne of course not. KylieTastic (talk) 19:16, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Did you at least check all of the pages and key details? KeymasterOne (talk) 13:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
@KeymasterOne, nope. If you have fun writing/reading this sort of fiction great, but it has no interest to me personally and no value regarding a Wikipedia article. Articles are based on independent reliable sources. Also new articles require significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability. KylieTastic (talk) 15:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Wouldn't I be able to use the website as a source? And, say this topic gets more info, coverage, sources, etc. on it in the future (for example), would I be able to publish this article then or is this note permanent? (as regard to my original question). KeymasterOne (talk) 16:31, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
@KeymasterOne nothing is permanent, any subject can become notable in the future. However, for many subjects the chance of becoming notable is as remote as winning a mega lottery. KylieTastic (talk) 16:49, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Excuse me, did you delete the page "Draft:Shorban Empire"?, because I cannot find it anymore. KeymasterOne (talk) 19:08, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Draft:Shorban Empire was deleted March 9, 2024 KylieTastic (talk) 19:10, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Is it an automatic system or did it happen manually, and if so, who deleted it? KeymasterOne (talk) 19:15, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Click on the link - it says which admin and why KylieTastic (talk) 19:17, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks KeymasterOne (talk) 19:26, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Editor experience invitation

Hi Kylietastic :) I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 20:49, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Interview? What interview? KeerthanaManiN (talk) 09:45, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
It's a page where I have asked experienced editors questions and many have answered. You're still quite new (so not quite what I'm looking for in terms of who I'm asking questions), but if you're curious, you can read the page I linked above. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 09:49, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Draft of Jenia Meng

Please search the name in independent sources: Google, Google book, Google scholar, and IMDB, and Wikipedia (her projects already in Wikipedia have article), what exactly do you want? More constructive way is approve the article and improve it. Otherwise it is like censorship Intodefinitecubic (talk) 21:28, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) Asker blocked for sockpuppetry; they have already received answers at Wikipedia:Teahouse#Draft got deleted, reason incorrect. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 22:45, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Draft: Miranda Kyle

I was woking the past two hours on an article on Miranda Kyle during an Art & Feminism edit-a-thon. When I started I tried to save it. is there anyway to get back the two hours of work I did on this article?

article text/not discussion

Miranda Kyle (ᏣᎸᎩ Cherokee descendant/European-American) is the Curator of Indigenous Arts of the Americas at the Michael C Carlos Museum in Atlanta, Georgia. She has expertise in Indigenous land rights, contemporary art, sociocultural activism, and community engagement. Before joining the museum she was the Program Manager of Arts and Culture for Atlanta BeltLine, Inc. (ABI)[1]

Miranda Kyle holds an MFA from the Savannah College of Art and Design and an MA from Edinburgh College of Arts.

As Chief Curator of the Atlanta Beltline, Miranda worked to increase the number of both temporary and permanent public artworks available to Beltline users. She was very deliberate about showcasing local Atlanta artists[2] and worked to collaborate with partners such as the National Black Arts Festival, the Woodruff Arts Center, and The Atlanta Opera. She also worked to make sure the artists chosen to participate felt respected and were well paid, "We want our artists to thrive; we want to sustain our creative community here. We have incredible artists here in the city; they just need the opportunity and the money to realize their big vision."[3]

Kyle will work to grow the Native North American Collection at the Carlos Museum. “Indigenous art holds the history of place, documents the reality of the times, and is a barometer of futurity,” said Kyle.[4]


Awards

  • 2022 Representation at the 2022 Berlin Biennial
  • 2021 Georgia Trend 2021 40 Under 40
  • 2021 Emory University Arts & Social Justice Fellow[1]
  • 2017 Curatorial residency with Hambidge Center
  • 2014 StarSeed Fellowship to research the intersection of Public Art, Performance and Space in Riga and Pedvale, Latvia
  • 2013 Lee Kimche McGrath Fellowship for Arts & Sciences for her research in utilizing 3D printing technologies within traditional foundry practices

External Links

I have an image of all 4 reputable references I was able to cite, but I wasn't able to copy and paste here

Kcolli2 (talk) 21:17, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

@Kcolli2 you appear to have found that work and posted it here - update Draft: Miranda Kyle don't write it here. KylieTastic (talk) 22:54, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
I did copy the work I did above, but I don't khow to get the work I did back into the draft you deleted. Thanks for your help. Kcolli2 (talk) 00:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
@Kcolli2 the draft was not deleted - but I see you found it already. KylieTastic (talk) 10:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Some bubble tea for you!

Thanks for fixing references on my first page creation! TaipeiScene (talk) 11:57, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

Hello KylieTastic,

New Page Review queue January to March 2024

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:28, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Functorial Programming - new article submission, please don't interfere without qualifications

This is about FUNCTORIAL programming, not functional programming... it is an ongoing active area of research also known as "Directed Type Theory" https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/directed+homotopy+type+theory This Wikipedia article is intendent as a gentle introduction and outline from the perspective where ordinary programmers can relate, but IT IS NOT A COPY of functional programming. Contributors to this new FUNCTORIAL programming paradigm are needed, so a Wikipedia article can help spread awareness 2001:8F8:1A61:418:4462:C895:7FA3:35DD (talk) 15:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC) 2001:8F8:1A61:418:4462:C895:7FA3:35DD (talk) 16:01, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Sorry - don't know how I misread that. KylieTastic (talk) 16:16, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Draft of Heya Masr rejection

Hello, I would like to know why you rejected my article especially considering the fact that the reasons you gave aren't accurate. First, my main source as mentioned is primary considering the fact that Heya Masr is a very known NGO here in Egypt (where I'm a resident) and in my line of work, I get to learn a lot more about NGOs in Egypt. But for the sake of accuracy I even checked Heya Masr's official website to make sure my information is correct. Other than the website, I don't know what other source you'd like me to use as in Egypt, there isn't a lot of information online about Egyptian NGOs considering their operational style and country laws. When it comes to the other reason you gave, that I may understand, however, I put those words in reference just for optics and in some cases just to provide some color in the text for the readers to be stimulated, but I can change it if it goes against any wikipedia rules.

Please let me know what I should do to get this article approved. Because this NGO is doing amazing work and I'd really love them to have a wikipedia page as it would increase their visibility and help people outside of Egypt learn more about NGOs in Egypt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by John koprivne (talk • contribs) 21:32, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

@John koprivne all but one of your sources is from the subject. For notability Wikipedia does not care what subjects say about themselves but what others say. Basically all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). Unfortunately there is no criteria for accepting NGOs or any subject just because they are doing good work. Do note that although this is English Wikipedia sources do not need to be in English. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 22:01, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Question

I must ask for my article what can I improve on it I have a source for it what else? Bally125 (talk) 13:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi Bally125, mindat.org is a user generated source (WP:USERGENERATED) and so is not reliable. As the other comment on the article said "all inhabited places are presumed notable" however we need a good source or two to show that it is actually a "Populated, legally recognized place". Try looking for government sources, voting, census records etc. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 13:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Ah okay thank you for clarifying it up! I was confused lol. Bally125 (talk) 14:01, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
@Bally125, no worries, there is a lot to learn at first editing here. The Wikipedia:Teahouse is always there for any general help advice new users need. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 14:05, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
is google maps a reliable source or no? Bally125 (talk) 18:27, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
@Bally125 no as it does not show that a place is a "legally recognized place" KylieTastic (talk) 18:29, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
aw man Bally125 (talk) 18:29, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
@Bally125 also the mindat.org coordinates 33°47'45.0"N 73°38'57.0"E show no place called Nar on google maps anyway KylieTastic (talk) 18:32, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
go on here it's a real place! https://www.google.com/maps/place/Nar/@33.8048599,73.6594963,14.23z/data=!4m6!3m5!1s0x391fe06300290265:0x8100a0cf3bba478e!8m2!3d33.3947792!4d73.8264677!16s%2Fg%2F1tdyd07k?entry=ttu Bally125 (talk) 18:33, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
@Bally125 which is a good show of why your mindat.org source is no good that is about 50km away KylieTastic (talk) 18:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
so should i use a different source? Bally125 (talk) 18:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
@KylieTastic Bally125 (talk) 18:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
@Bally125 See previous: "Try looking for government sources, voting, census records etc" KylieTastic (talk) 18:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Map-of-Dsitrict-Kotli-Azad-Jammu-Kashmir_fig1_266419484 what about this? Bally125 (talk) 18:50, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
@KylieTastic Bally125 (talk) 18:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
@Bally125 it's just a picture, also researchgate.net has good and bad content as anyone can publish there. I don't doubt there is a place there but Wikipedia requires a solid source. I would suggest asking at Wikipedia:WikiProject Pakistan as they may know where to find good sources for such subjects. KylieTastic (talk) 19:03, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
ah okay Bally125 (talk) 19:04, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
sorry if im late but what about this? https://pakistan.places-in-the-world.com/1415039-place-nar.html
@KylieTastic Bally125 (talk) 15:07, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
@Bally125 it doesn't really have any info. It has no population details and the coordinates ae for Kotli. Everything else is just based on the rough location. Unfortunately there are several of these sites that trawl general info and make automatic pages that are not very helpful, and it makes finding the real info more difficult. KylieTastic (talk) 17:26, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
alright then go search up nar in the wikipedia and if you go to the asia section its says Nar, a small village in Kotli district, Pakistan-controlled Azad Kashmir, what about that? Bally125 (talk) 23:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
@KylieTastic Bally125 (talk) 02:06, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
@Bally125 no you cannot use Wikipedia as a source for Wikipedia, you can't use any "wikis" or similar user-generated content. Actually that entry could/should be removed from Nar as there is no article and Azad Kashmir does not actually mention it either. Unfortunately the local government site http://ajk.gov.pk is unresponsive. I see that Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pakistan is also a dead looking project. The point of an encyclopedia article is to inform people, if there is not reliable sourced information to share there is no point in having an article. Sorry but this is quite normal problem for some countries/areas, usually ones with less internet usage - sources are hard to find or just don't exist for small locations. There is nothing more I have to offer, apart from maybe say you could ask at a more open platform for advice such as the Wikipedia:Teahouse. KylieTastic (talk) 09:35, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
you there? Bally125 (talk) 18:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

parameters for image files

I'm at a bit of a loss here. I'm following published wiki help but seeing changes. Today, while I placed an image on the left side of the page, KylieTastic moved it to the right (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Felix_Albrecht_Harta). I know that the right is the default, but I'd like to understand: Is this a new policy. Are images on the left now verboten? Valuenyc (talk) 17:39, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi Valuenyc, sorry I should have left an edit summary, but it is a standard formatting. Your correct, mostly images do go on the right to avoid breaking up the text, but no left is not verboten. Usually images only start being moved to the left just to balance things if there are a lot of images, or if the image is key the the section. However in this case on Draft:Felix Albrecht Harta it was in the lead section, and the main image always goes on the right or probably more importantly it should be said that the text always starts. Images are important to assist improving articles, but the text is still considered the primary item. I've always taken it as readers don't care on the image location when looking, by they do prefer to read text starting on the left. Hope that helps, Regards KylieTastic (talk) 17:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Yes, indeed. This helps quite a lot. Your reasoning is sound, and I can live with the picture on the right. Many many many thanks. Valuenyc (talk) 18:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Sandbox

How do I create a new sandbox? IceStorm 54 (talk) 14:12, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi @IceStorm 54 you have several options:
Hope that helps KylieTastic (talk) 14:26, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Can you review my draft? IceStorm 54 (talk) 14:30, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
@IceStorm 54 sorry but to be fair to all submitters I don't review/re-review on request, I just pick new and old submissions at random or work on certain topics, so it may or may not be myself who reviews it next. Also I'm working on some other backlogs at the moment. I will note that you have no source indicated for the second section. KylieTastic (talk) 14:36, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Draft:AdLunamInc.

Hi KylieTastic. I used the article wizard to start this article and cited one source that I could find. Tried to get a few more in from what I found online. My intention is to document the existence of the company but the comment I got said it sounded promotional. So Im not sure how to proceed. I will make a few edits to improve it but im open to feedback. Its first attempt to work on a new page. Jervisap (talk) 09:02, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Jervisap, Wikipedia is not a place for all subjects that just exist, but for subjects that are deemed to be 'notable' by our guidelines - see Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) in this case. In general all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). Many companies may never become notable, others will be in time as more is written about them. So if other sources do not currently exist it's time to just move onto something else. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 09:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi KylieTastic . Understood. Would pages like these qualify for a stub instead? Jervisap (talk) 10:56, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi @Jervisap, sorry no - notability is a fundamental requirement. Stubs are for notable subjects but for articles that just don't have much content yet. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 11:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

neuter cats

Me-ow! -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:23, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

@Deepfriedokra  :) KylieTastic (talk) 19:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Draft:GULAB Phelwan

Hello KylieTastic, Draft:GULAB Phelwan declined. I want to add something for this great personality, was a great soical reformer of 1900's. Tales of his wisdom were spread far and wide, I want to share some famous events of his life. People of his village wants there hisory to be conserved and be available for the upcomming generations. And I have all the relevent proofs for that.

kindly do the needful Thank You Drall0007 (talk) 13:36, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

@Drall0007 all content on Wikipedia need to be referenced with reliable sources. Draft:GULAB Phelwan has no sources at all. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 13:43, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Can you please delete my page, I want to get rid of it. Thanks,

Please Pilotnance (talk) 19:01, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

@Pilotnance I'm not an administrator so cannot delete a page. You can always just blank a page as that is good enough unless it contains a copyright violation and needs a full delete. KylieTastic (talk) 19:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
can you remove the request then please Pilotnance (talk) 19:07, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
@Pilotnance done. KylieTastic (talk) 19:07, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks Pilotnance (talk) 19:08, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Ecuador Women's National Under-17 Football Team

Hello KylieTastic,

How are you? I see that my submission for Draft:Ecuador Women's National Under-17 Football Team, was declined. I was wondering, is there a specific part in the article that needed reference or are there not enough references, or is something else wrong besides that, as I have provided a reliable reference.

Thank you,

God Bless,

Loganmascarenhas Loganmascarenhas (talk) 15:02, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi Loganmascarenhas, all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). A rough guide is 3+ such sources are needed to show notability. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 15:06, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
I see, thank you for your help. I was wondering, however, can the sources be different web pages from the same website, (e.g. fifa.com/example1) and (e.g fifa.com/example2). Thank you for your help,
Loganmascarenhas Loganmascarenhas (talk) 21:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Hey Loganmascarenhas, yes many articles have multiple sources from the same site, especially if they are key to a subject like fifa.com or main news sites. However, for showing notability it would count less but can still be helpful. For instance if you had three separate sources that did not quite have enough depth to show notability adding more sources from the same sites would definitely help. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 21:18, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks, I appretiate your help. Loganmascarenhas (talk) 21:25, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Polar_wedge

Hi KyleTastic,

Thank you for taking the time to read and evaluate my draft on the polar wedge. Unfortunately I believe your requested changes (in particular "sources independent of the subject") are impossible to be met, as there is no scientific literature on this device, and linking vendor descriptions of the various products available would hardly meet the other source criteria(?). However, there is a German Wikipedia article on the subject (Polhöhenwiege) which I tried to match as closely as possible, and the article mainly states general facts that are easy to confirm by common sense once understood.

The subject is relevant to people interested in astronomy, and the German page helped me a lot in that regard, so please let me know if it's worth resubmitting at all. 89.186.158.15 (talk) 14:00, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello IP! If you cannot find reliable sources, then the subject is probably not notable. The German Wikipedia has different guidelines and policies. Happy editing! —asparagusus (interaction) sprouts! 14:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Alright, thank you, and happy editing! 89.186.158.15 (talk) 14:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for answering @Asparagusus. IP, I did look myself and although "polar wedge" gets a lot of google hits and looks possible notable it certainly does appear that most are sales links so any good sources are well hidden. I thought German Wikipedia required minimum sources as well these days, it may be because it was created back in 2009. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 16:00, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
  • On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:KylieTastic/Archive_2024"