User talk:Kiransharma
Welcome!
Hello, Kiransharma, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Matina La Ana He Du, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Pyrusca (talk) 20:36, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Matina La Ana He Du
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Matina La Ana He Du requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pyrusca (talk) 20:36, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
- You have removed speedy delete template.
- You quote your sources in Talk page, the page doesn't include any.
- You have to prove notability, not any film deserves to have its page.Xx236 (talk) 07:06, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
- Please reference reliable sources.
- Please explain the subject. Xx236 (talk) 07:03, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
- What is Litumol script?Xx236 (talk) 13:43, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Please sign your comments with four '~'
Xx236 (talk) 07:04, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
November 2016
Hello, I'm Wikishovel. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Newari have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Wikishovel (talk) 20:14, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Nepali or Nepalese
In the use of 'Nepali' or 'Nepalese'? I draw your attention to this writing by a linguist- *'Nepali' or 'Nepalese'? A linguist chimes in (Associated Press)* (https://www.yahoo.com/news/nepali-nepalese-linguist-chimes-080030138.html). I have reverted your edits, given the argument proposed by the linguist. Himalayanbullet (talk) 15:36, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Nepali is a controversial word these days, which refers to certain group of people or one particular language. Nepalese indicates all the people and all languages of Nepal. The above link indicates only one view of a layman, not from any linguist.
-- Thank you for the response. While understanding the sensitivity you claim, using the analogy - Hindi music as opposed to Indian music which encompass very different subjects and types, would you not agree that the music-related subjects, particularly vocal derive from the language? Further, in order to address this matter holistically, could you please provide any bibliographic reference for the controversy around this usage? Also and related: can you please provide any bibliographic reference regarding the comment made by the linguist? Himalayanbullet (talk) 05:52, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Litumol script
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Litumol script requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:43, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Kiransharma. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Ganesh Ram Lachhi, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- edit the page
- remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}} - save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
TonyBallioni (talk) 20:40, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
The article Tuyumati has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable film per WP:NFILM guidelines. I am restricted in my ability to search for sources in either Nepalese or the film's own language, but such extant sources as are available seem only to confirm its existence, rather than provide the depth of coverage required.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:38, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The article Patachara has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence of coverage (admittedly, I'm restricted to English-language sources here) approaching NFILM guidelines for this film.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 08:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The article Litumol script has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable script with no known sources.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 02:07, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi Kiranshama
Hi User:Kiranshama, I'm Daniel and I'll love to cheerfully share something with you.
It is considered good practice to provide a summary for every edit, especially when reverting (undoing) the actions of other editors or deleting existing text; otherwise, people may question your motives for the edit.
Wikipedia is a team work and we need each other. We value your contributions. It's good you leave a summary so we can all know what you are contributing.
Accurate summaries help other contributors decide whether it is worthwhile for them to review an edit, and to understand the change should they choose to review it. When a major edit (e.g. deletion of a substantial amount of text, a significant addition, or a substantial rewrite) doesn't have an edit summary, there are fewer reasons you get many of the editors confused. Summaries are less important for minor changes (which means generally unchallengeable changes such as spelling or grammar corrections), but a brief note like "fixed spelling" is helpful even then.
To avoid accidentally leaving edit summaries blank, you can select "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" on the Editing tab of your user preferences
See Help:Edit_summary for more.
You are doing a great job. Danidamiobi (talk) 11:31, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
The article Anushka Shrestha has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. SSSB (talk) 18:11, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Matina La Ana He Du for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matina La Ana He Du is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matina La Ana He Du until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 19:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)