User talk:Kevinwolfenden
June 2021
Hello, I'm DL6443. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Craig Button have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. DL6443 (Talk/Contribs) 23:41, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Craig Button. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DL6443 (Talk/Contribs) 23:42, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
March 2023
Hello, I'm 74.73.224.126. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Michael Heisley have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 00:02, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Im watching a documentary and it seems factual to me. He's a POS who lied and moved the Grizzlies when he said he wouldn't 🤷🏼‍♂️ Kevinwolfenden (talk) 00:27, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Michael Heisley. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 00:21, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- He really is (Redacted). It's pure facts. Kevinwolfenden (talk) 00:28, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently been editing articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated a contentious topic. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
74.73.224.126 (talk) 00:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)