User talk:Kevindphan/sandbox

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Peer Reviews

The addition of the use of social media by the IS is thoughtful and informative. It has good citations. However, the draft could use less direct quotations and more summary and paraphrasing. For example, the 3rd paragraph detailing the offline propaganda techniques used by IS can simply summarize the main points of the article instead of quoting it.

The presence of IS on YouTube and Facebook are also significant, so perhaps the article should also summarize their propaganda techniques and reach on those platforms, and how have those platforms responded to curb extremists contents. Jackyliang (talk) 05:50, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Reviews

I thought you did a wonderful job with the amount of information and in-depth research with the connections between ISIS and social media. It seemed very relevant, especially with what we have been studying in class. It is also clear you understand how to edit in Wikipedia. With all the wonderful content you have, it is clear you knew what you were doing when assuring you had the proper citations.

Overall, it was well written / cited. I also learned something from reading it (I didn't know Twitter banned so many ISIS accounts). Well done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lentyski8 (talk • contribs) 06:37, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Kevindphan/sandbox"