User talk:Kelator

May 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Takbir, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 01:08, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Takbir. M.Bitton (talk) 01:23, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Takbir. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 01:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Kelator reported by User:M.Bitton (Result: ). Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 02:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Takbir. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 02:48, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Takbir) for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring and pov pushing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  EvergreenFir (talk) 04:56, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Comment - you were site blocked for 2 days for the same behavior and yet you have continued to engage in disruption on this article. I considered a WP:NOTHERE block but decided to see if you can added constructively on other pages. Any further disruption should result in an indefinite block. EvergreenFir (talk) 04:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)