User talk:Keepcalmandchill

Redirect

I have updated History of ideas to Intellectual history. Editor2020 (talk) 01:58, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of human thought, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Naturalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of proposed megaprojects

Hello, Keepcalmandchill. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of proposed megaprojects".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 12:11, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aleksandr Dugin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Golden Dawn.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of democratically elected anti-capitalist governments

Hello, Keepcalmandchill. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of democratically elected anti-capitalist governments".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:45, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the Donald Trump presidency (2017 Q1), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native Americans.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:34, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of films about the Troubles

Hello, Keepcalmandchill. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of films about the Troubles".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 00:54, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the Donald Trump presidency (2017 Q1), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emoluments Clause.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:11, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Category:Proposed public policies has been nominated for merging

Category:Proposed public policies has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 13:09, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

"Refugee sponsorship" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Refugee sponsorship. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 18#Refugee sponsorship until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:45, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:History of populism in the United States

Hello, Keepcalmandchill. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "History of populism in the United States".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:25, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Politics

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Politics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 07:01, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

"List of terrorist incident..." articles

Please do not attempt to unilaterally override the consensus from the Rfc. If you object to the outcome of that Rfc, I suggest you start a new one at Talk:List of terrorist incidents. Thank you. FDW777 (talk) 07:59, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Politics

The article Politics you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Politics for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 17:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Removing complaints from noticeboards

Hello Keepcalmandchill. If you have submitted a complaint to a noticeboard for action by admins, please don't remove it yourself. In a case like the recent one, add a comment that you are withdrawing the report and let an admin take care of it. If this dispute restarts for any reason, we want to have record of the past discussions. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 18:03, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring warning

Your recent editing history at Hellenistic philosophy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Teishin (talk) 03:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2020s in environmental history

A tag has been placed on Category:2020s in environmental history requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:22, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring at Hellenistic philosophy

Hello Keepcalmandchill. You've been warned for long term edit warring as a result of the complaint at the edit warring board. The next time you or the other party make a change to Hellenistic philosophy you are risking a block unless you have received a prior consensus for your change on the article talk page. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:51, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

EdJohnston, Yes, I have questions. So what if I want to add new content to the page now? How do I seek prior consensus if others don't know what I'm going to add? Do I just post the proposed edits in their entirety to the talk page? What if the only other active editor does not respond? Keepcalmandchill (talk) 02:01, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

If you want to add new content to the article, you should describe it on the talk page and then wait for others to give their agreement. If you get no response, consider asking a Wikiproject. Six weeks of edit warring is more than enough. EdJohnston (talk) 03:42, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

EdJohnston, I am confused, which of these restrictions is currently being applied: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Editing_restrictions#Types_of_restrictions ? Why could we not have the 1-revert rule, as that would at least allow new content to be added to the page? How long is this restriction in place for? Keepcalmandchill (talk) 04:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

It is a one-of-a-kind restriction. I am warning you and the other party that any further edits of Hellenistic philosophy that don't have talk page consensus will be regarded as a continuation of your previous edit warring, and may be blockable as such. If you object to this, there are two, more conventional options I could have considered: (a) full protection of Hellenistic philosophy for a month or more, or (b) partial blocks that would prevent both of you from editing the article, but still let you edit the talk page.

It is typical for editors who disagree to open WP:Requests for comment when there is an intractable dispute. The restriction will no longer be needed if you and the other party are able to work out some compromises on the talk page. What is not acceptable is another six weeks of steady reverting of one another's changes to the article. EdJohnston (talk) 04:30, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Please back up your claims at ANI

Hello Keepcalmandchill, can you please back up your latest claims at WP:ANI#User:Teishin acting in an insulting and unconstructive way with diffs, so that we can move towards a resolution? ◅ Sebastian 20:50, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Western philosophy

Per User_talk:SebastianHelm/Philosophy#Disengagement?, the above restrictions are extended to the article Western philosophy. This is limited under a certain condition – see the linked talk page for details. ◅ Sebastian 15:38, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Update regarding the war at Hellenistic philosophy

Hello Keepcalmandchill. I've agreed with User:SebastianHelm that he should go ahead with his plan for resolving the disagreement between you and Keepcalmandchill about Hellenistic philosophy. See my update here. I won't take any action myself unless the edit war at Hellenistic philosophy restarts. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello Keepcalmandchill, I was just about to notify you that the case has been closed when I noticed your self-reverted message. This was a valid point; such a message would now be appropriate at User talk:SebastianHelm/Philosophy. ◅ Sebastian 23:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

SebastianHelm, Already posted on your talk page, in case you missed it. Sorry, nevermind!Keepcalmandchill (talk) 00:39, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Named references

Hello, your edits on the 2020s in military history article resulted in reference errors. Kindly note that reference names are not shared sitewide, but unique to each article (see also WP:REFNAME). I was able to fix this for you thanks to one of your edit summaries. Wakari07 (talk) 00:09, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of 2020s in environmental history

Hello! Your submission of 2020s in environmental history at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:51, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Yoninah, Yes, I would like to withdraw the nom, please. Keepcalmandchill (talk) 07:53, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of political films set in the United States

Hello, Keepcalmandchill. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of political films set in the United States".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:44, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

great work

good work on article 2020s in military history! I'm pleased to see this new addition to our coverage of contemporary history, here at Wikipedia. keep it up!! --Sm8900 (talk) 22:00, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Sm8900! I will proudly display the barnstar you gave me on my user page! Keepcalmandchill (talk) 05:04, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

no problem! glad you like it. keep up the great work. see you! --Sm8900 (talk) 15:05, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

barnstar for you

		The Epic Barnstar
		A barnstar for your great work on historical topics, creating entries to track the contemporary history of the 2020s, via entries on military, economic and environmental history. well done!! Sm8900 (talk) 22:09, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Current Events barnstar awarded

		The Current Events Barnstar
		for your diligent work in keeping entries for current events and contemporary history topics up to date on a regular basis, especially 2020s in political history, plus the other entries of this type. Headquarters Command, WikiProject History, is proud to award you this barnstar. well done!! Sm8900 (talk) 19:46, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

The world is small

Hello! Funny that I would come across one of your edits by coincidence – I just decided on a whim to checked some of the recent edits at the top of User:HostBot/Social media traffic report. Kind regards, ◅ Sebastian 00:04, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Haha, it sure is! Keepcalmandchill (talk) 01:17, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

In fact, you will probably randomly see me again at some point as I’ve decided to embark on an epic project to improve the See also sections of articles by adding links, then following one of the links and adding more there, and then repeating that process until I’ve run out of pages. We’ll see how long that takes. Keepcalmandchill (talk) 02:17, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Ha, we may find ourselves to be pulling on opposite ends of the rope, then. I sometimes occupy myself reducing "See also" sections by removing links that already occur in the main text or have no direct relationship to the topic, and adding those to the text that belong there (and expanding the main text, if necessary). ◅ Sebastian 10:56, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Well, if you think of the 'See also' as a to-do list for article expansion, then perhaps we are pulling in the same direction after all! Keepcalmandchill (talk) 05:49, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of 2020 Avignon incident for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2020 Avignon incident is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 Avignon incident until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:51, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Jimmy Gordon Buzzzzzz

I'm glad you are addressing the issue of the statement about Jimmie Gordon's "Buzzzzzz" in the Garage Rock article. Someone added the statement a while back, and I wasn't really sure what to think about it. I'm not exactly against having the statement in the article, but it seems to be out of place in the spot where it was inserted. The prior statements leading up to it do not say anything about fuzz--they are there to mention core musical influences on garage, such as instrumental rock and surf. Then, suddenly we now have this new statement about a song with fuzz, so it doesn't really fit--as a result the section looses its focus on early chronology.

There are other parts of the article that actually do discuss fuzz, but I wonder if it should be there either--I believe that the Ventures used fuzz in an earlier record. Furthermore, you pointed out in your comments that source presented was inadequate. I think that the statement could certainly be moved to the article about guitar distortion--it seems that would be a better place. Personally, I would not object to removing it in the Garage rock article, and I'm sure that others would agree. Garagepunk66 (talk) 10:45, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

I decided to remove it. Quick research showed that Grady Martin invented fuzz already in 1961, two years prior (fun fact: the discovery was thanks to a faulty amp). Distortion (music) has more detail if you want to incorporate it to the article, cheers Keepcalmandchill (talk) 10:57, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. Happy New Year!Garagepunk66 (talk) 20:02, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Rock music

Your last edits have messed up the formatting of some of the citations, so I'll revert to the previous version. Can I strongly suggest that you make your intended edits in a WP:SANDBOX, so that any glitches can be resolved before it goes into a mainspace article. Thanks. Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:46, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Rock music. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:44, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Savo Brigade

Hello, Keepcalmandchill. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Savo Brigade".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:42, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Rock music into Draft:History of rock music. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 14:28, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Edit-warring on The Daily Caller

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 22:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

I adjusted my edits after a reversion, and hence did not edit war. Since no reason was given for the reversion, I could not know what exactly was being objected to, so I minimized the amount of content that was changed. Keepcalmandchill (talk) 23:05, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:History of Philosophy

Hello, Keepcalmandchill. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "History of Philosophy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:24, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Political history of Belarus

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Political history of Belarus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://photius.com/countries/belarus/government/belarus_government_prelude_to_independe~677.html, http://countrystudies.us/belarus/39.htm, and https://namecensus.com/reference/country_studies/belarus/GOVERNMENT.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mccapra (talk) 19:54, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

question re task force

hi. would you be interested in joining the task force on contemporary history, at WP:HIST? I have noticed that you have done some valuable work in this topical area. feel free to let me know. please ping me when you reply. thanks! --Sm8900 (talk) 15:40, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

I would love to be added! Thanks so much for asking. Keepcalmandchill (please ping in responses) (talk) 09:04, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

terrific! please go to the page below, and add your name to that task force's list of members. thanks! --Sm8900 (talk) 14:13, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

• Wikipedia:WikiProject_History#Task_forces

--Sm8900 (talk) 14:13, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Outline of meditation

Hello, Keepcalmandchill. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Outline of meditation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:22, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of left-wing terrorist attacks

Hello, Keepcalmandchill. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of left-wing terrorist attacks, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Note re decade overviews

Hi there. thanks for all your great work on the 2020s decade overviews! looks terrific. just want to let you know about the note below, which i have posted at Talk:2020s in political history

I notice some comments in the edit history for this article, noting that we should try to limit this article from getting too big. I have a suggestion; we should have a separate article for listing election outcomes for specific countries. while this is valuable data, a single election is generally not notable enough in relation to overall history of the decade. Therefore, I will be creating a new article, 2020s in electoral politics. this is where all news and data for election outcomes should go. I hope that's ok. please feel free to comment. thanks. ---Sm8900 (talk) 🌍 14:24, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

I would welcome your comments. if you reply here, please ping me. thanks! ---Sm8900 (talk) 🌍 15:19, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Outline of meditation

Hello, Keepcalmandchill. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Outline of meditation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:53, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:2020s in culture

Hello, Keepcalmandchill. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2020s in culture, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:History of rock music

Hello, Keepcalmandchill. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:History of rock music, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:History of rock music

Hello, Keepcalmandchill. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "History of rock music".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:28, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Italian political history

Hello, Keepcalmandchill. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Italian political history, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Political history of Myanmar

Hello, Keepcalmandchill. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Political history of Myanmar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of tallest proposed buildings

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of tallest proposed buildings requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vitaium (talk) 04:14, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of left-wing terrorist attacks

Hello, Keepcalmandchill. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of left-wing terrorist attacks".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:06, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Crime in Sydney

Hello, Keepcalmandchill. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Crime in Sydney, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of List of right-wing terrorist attacks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of right-wing terrorist attacks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of right-wing terrorist attacks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Excuse the tag, trying to tick all the boxes ~ cygnis insignis 12:10, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:2000s in political history

Hello, Keepcalmandchill. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2000s in political history, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Greater Turkey

Hello, Keepcalmandchill. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Greater Turkey, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2000s in political history

Hello, Keepcalmandchill. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2000s in political history".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:32, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Military history of the Russian Federation

Please see WP:G6 regarding making room for move. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 09:14, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Thanks! Keepcalmandchill (please ping in responses) (talk) 09:17, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for your efforts

		The Current Events Barnstar
		Awarded for efforts in expanding and verifying articles related to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Question re possible contact

Hi. thanks so much for all your help with updating the article 2020s in political history, plus all of your other great, outstanding work in updating the other contemporary overview articles for the decade of the 2020s!!

I am thinking of setting up some sort of group thread to encourage contact between editors who work on articles pertaining to current events, and to contemporary history. Would you be interested in participating? please feel free to let me know. --Sm8900 (talk) 01:26, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

@Sm8900 That would be great, thank you so much for your invitation and kind words! Keepcalmandchill (please ping in responses) (talk) 07:57, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

terrific! I will let you know if and when I move ahead with this. right now, i was just trying to see if anyone at all might be interested.

by the way, would you like to join up as a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Task forces/Contemporary history task force? we could certainly use you there. by the way, I'm the Lead Coordinator at WikiProject History. we would welcome your input there. thanks! --Sm8900 (talk) 08:47, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Political history of Brazil

Hello, Keepcalmandchill. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Political history of Brazil".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:41, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Political history of Thailand

Hello, Keepcalmandchill. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Political history of Thailand, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Former Finnish military units

A tag has been placed on Category:Former Finnish military units indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:41, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Russian imperialism

Hello, Keepcalmandchill. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Russian imperialism, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Political history of the Russian Federation

Hello, Keepcalmandchill. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Political history of the Russian Federation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Strategic Bombing in Ukraine

Thanks for representing this important topic in Strategic bombing. The main article, which I was not aware of, goes into more depth about the strategic campaign in the Lead. There are many quality sources speaking to this topic. I would like to see the section expanded. Regards Flibbertigibbets (talk) 03:23, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Peru

WMrapids added fringe material to the intro of 2022 Peruvian self-coup attempt which you fortunately removed, however this isn't the only problem with their edits on Peruvian related articles. At 2022–2023 Peruvian political protests and many related pages they also copied and pasted masses of text as "Background": [1], [2], [3], [4], Juliaca massacre, Ayacucho massacre. Their additions are full of WP:SYNTH. Basically their own original research with a very selective narrative of events and also full of source misrepresentation. The sources they are using to create "Background" for the self-coup and protests are largely older news stories, and WMrapids's own summary of the background to the unrest which they have added to so many articles doesn't correspond that closely to how contemporary sources summarize it. Despite the many issues, many of their additions are still good but there are also many problems too and they have been challenged on these Peruvian related articles, including Pedro Castillo but they don't seem to engage with criticism, often just reverting back without discussion. 2A02:C7D:69B6:4300:F80B:A175:ED6D:3E08 (talk) 21:13, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Artificial intelligence in philosophy

Hello, Keepcalmandchill. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Artificial intelligence in philosophy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023

Your edit to Draft:Political history of Thailand has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:17, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Artificial intelligence in philosophy

Hello, Keepcalmandchill. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Artificial intelligence in philosophy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:48, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of List of right-wing terrorist attacks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of right-wing terrorist attacks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of right-wing terrorist attacks (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AlanS^talk 09:41, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia

You did not identify the source of the material in your edit. It appears to be Albany Congress. Copying within Wikipedia is acceptable but it must be attributed.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, linking to the source article and adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.

While best practices are that attribution should be added to the edit summary at the time the edit is made, the linked article on best practices describes the appropriate steps to add attribution after the fact. I have done so for you this time, but hope you will follow best practices yourself next time.

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that need to be crossed.~~~~ S Philbrick(Talk) 12:36, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! Forgot to do it but will continue doing it from now on! Keepcalmandchill (please ping in responses) (talk) 23:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

List of terrorist incidents in Russia moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of terrorist incidents in Russia. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boleyn (talk) 16:42, 26 March 2024 (UTC)