User talk:Kailasher

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome

Hello Kailasher, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Kailasher, good luck, and have fun. – Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:22, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse Invitation

Teahouse logo
Hello! Kailasher, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:27, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Saraswati Mandir High School) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Saraswati Mandir High School, Kailasher!

Wikipedia editor Mz7 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

As you expand the article, try to add references to third-party sources (sources that are not affiliated with the subject of the article). Non-English sources are also acceptable.

To reply, leave a comment on Mz7's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thanks for your review. I will expand the article with references to third-party sources.Kailasher (talk) 03:32, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maria Amor Torres (June 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 18:34, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest policy

Information icon Hello, Kailasher. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 17:11, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have recently come acros some of the works of We Care for Humanity in India and some or other way I am a victim of those atrocities which they want to redeem.Kailasher (talk) 01:26, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for responding. No conflict of interest then. It would still be extremely helpful for you to familiarize yourself with the content policies mentioned. You'll also want to look closely at the Biographies of living persons policy and the notability guidelines. --Ronz (talk) 16:41, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your guidance.Kailasher (talk) 16:44, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maria Amor Torres for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maria Amor Torres is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Amor Torres until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:12, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of We Care for Humanity for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article We Care for Humanity is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We Care for Humanity until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:12, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Global Officials of Dignity Awards for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Global Officials of Dignity Awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Officials of Dignity Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:12, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Maria Amor Torres

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Maria Amor Torres, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.princessmariaamor.com/about.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Maria Amor Torres saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!

Is it safe to assume the other two articles have similar problems? --Ronz (talk) 20:08, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? Please respond. Also, take a look at WP:BLP as well, which states, "Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced – whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable – should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion". --Ronz (talk) 14:45, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The article has been speedy deleted. The company article appears to also have copyright problems. How do you want to proceed?--Ronz (talk) 15:15, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[1] Thanks for the cleanup. --Ronz (talk) 14:41, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Global Officials of Dignity Awards.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Global Officials of Dignity Awards.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:19, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:We Care for Humanity.jpeg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:We Care for Humanity.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maria Amor Torres, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filipino. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Kirti M.Doongursee College Logo.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kirti M.Doongursee College Logo.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:55, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maria Amor Torres for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maria Amor Torres is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Amor Torres (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maria Amor Torres for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maria Amor Torres is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Amor Torres (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MarioGom (talk) 16:50, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kirti M.Doongursee College Logo.jpeg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kirti M.Doongursee College Logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Kailasher"