User talk:Jwe2019

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome!

Hello, Jwe2019, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Srleffler (talk) 01:56, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Information icon Hello, I'm Ifnord. I noticed that you recently removed content from Gordon Gould without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ifnord (talk) 19:19, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David R. Huber (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Taewangkorea was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at David R. Huber instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Taewangkorea (talk) 21:55, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Jwe2019! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Taewangkorea (talk) 21:55, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jasper Deeter (January 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Jasper Deeter instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 08:58, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:David R. Huber concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:David R. Huber, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Connection to Sessions College for Professional Design?

Do you have a connection to Sessions College for Professional Design? ElKevbo (talk) 00:16, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Connection to Sessions College for Professional Design?

No, I do not. Reason for posting this is to present alternatives to more costly non-profit colleges for design students. Students carrying heavy student debt is a problem. I controlled my college debt by "banking" long-distant credits at Thomas Edison State College (now Thomas Edison State University). I recently worked at Liason International writing web copy for more than 120 colleges in unversities. With advent of COVID-19, on-line learning is gaining prominence. I came across Sessions College for Professional Design and am impressed that unlike many for-profit schools it has never been cited for bad practices, it received early accreditation is has impressive ratings. I do not intend for this to be promotional in any way for the school, but rather verification of existing as a reputable on-line alternative for design students.[User:Jwe2019|Jwe2019]] (talk) 04 October 2020 (UTC) Jwe2019 (talk) 14:24, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sessions College for Professional Design (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Sessions College for Professional Design instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
There already is an article on the college. The edit summary for this draft indicates that this is meant to be a more complete description of the school. Expansion of an article is done by editing the article. Articles for Creation is not used to submit revisions or expansions of existing articles. You may ask for advice about expanding an article at the Teahouse.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 18:15, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June Prager moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, June Prager, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 12:54, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:David R. Huber

Hello, Jwe2019. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "David R. Huber".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:42, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:June Prager

Information icon Hello, Jwe2019. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:June Prager, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sessions College for Professional Design

Information icon Hello, Jwe2019. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sessions College for Professional Design, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:04, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sessions College for Professional Design

Hello, Jwe2019. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sessions College for Professional Design".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:29, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Jwe2019"