User talk:Justice Faith

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Justice Faith, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Randykitty (talk) 10:19, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rebecca Nengi Hampson (February 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Facebook, YouTube, blogs Opera News are not reliablesources
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 13:25, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Justice Faith! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 13:25, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Rebecca Nengi Hampson has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rebecca Nengi Hampson. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On Draft:Rebecca Nengi Hampson

I came across this comment of yours & all I have to say is at this juncture, you all are just poising the well for your client. What other non Nigerian editors like the prolific editor @Theroadislong might not catch but other sincere Nigerians editors would, is that we know this is UPE(which means you are accepting rewards (financially) or otherwise) for the creation of this article, there’s a definite COI here as you are walking the very thin line of WP:SPA. I put it to you that you have an undisclosed COI & you must disclose this or the article would never ever be accepted, and that’s a factual statement. Celestina007 (talk) 19:04, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Truth is, I've only been on Wikipedia for four months, so I've not yet mastered how to approach users on their talk pages. Perhaps that's why my comments are being misconstrued.

My truth however is that nobody is paying me. These comments are actually offensive cause God knows I log onto Wikipedia everyday and read articles and go to people's user pages to try and learn a thing or two. Everyday! I'm really just trying to learn how to use the platform and what works and what doesn't. These accusations are grave really. Justice Faith (talk) 06:32, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon

Hello Justice Faith. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Justice Faith. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Justice Faith|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 19:17, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Theroadislong you're mistaken, I have not been paid to make the draft or any other Wikipedia edits I've been making to pages. I didn't even know some people were paid to create pages.

My draft was declined and I've since made edits but have not yet resubmitted. I was advised by you to use a neutral tone, and because I actually went and read all the Wikipedia rules you attached to your review on my draft. I've since gotten a better understanding of how to draft thats all. Justice Faith (talk) 06:24, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just curious as to what part of my edits give a "paid" impression. Justice Faith (talk) 06:26, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is it because I make so many edits? Cause my explanation for that is that I don't want the draft to be declined again. And I've read some articles featured on wiki as good articles and those you've created and I also desire for the draft to be up to Wikipedia standard such that I don't take as long to create other pages in the near future.

I apologise for the numerous comments, I'm just shocked about the accusations. Justice Faith (talk) 07:01, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rebecca Nengi Hampson (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Celestina007 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Notability threshold is not met and the WP:COI is yet to be disclosed.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Celestina007 (talk) 01:05, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing to be disclosed. No conflict of interest, just 4 months of research and effort.

I've made peace with the fact that you think I'm lying and it's okay. Just delete the draft. Eventually someone else will pick interest in the subject and maybe write better than me and have theirs accepted.

As for my draft, can't have my character tainted by a stranger.

Kindly delete it. Justice Faith (talk) 12:28, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Justice_Faith"