User talk:Jurist25

New account

You previously edited as eiilir (talk · contribs). — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:54, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Having now reviewed your edits with the above user name, I think {{spamusername}} would have been a more appropriate blocking reason. Linkspam will not be tolerated but I am prepared to let you have another go with EIILIR. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:03, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The European Institute for International Law & International Relations (EIILIR)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The European Institute for International Law & International Relations (EIILIR) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:33, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this on "insult". If you are actually prepared to write a new article specifically for Wikipedia and above all provide links to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources, then an article might stick. I suggest submit it via AfC. The title should be European Institute for International Law and International Relations — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:51, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Bright Case

A tag has been placed on Bright Case requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hang on}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. - Barek (talk) - 16:44, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with European Institute for International Law and International Relations

Hello. Concerning your contribution, European Institute for International Law and International Relations, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.eiil.eu/en/about-us/about-us.html. As a copyright violation, European Institute for International Law and International Relations appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. European Institute for International Law and International Relations has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:European Institute for International Law and International Relations and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:European Institute for International Law and International Relations with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:European Institute for International Law and International Relations.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. - Barek (talk) - 16:44, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahmoud Refaat. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --- Barek (talk) - 16:45, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]