User talk:Julie11094

duplicate links on Romco Group

thankyou for contribution to wikipedia. i noticed that your recent contribution to Romco Group included multiple links to the same pages. per MOS:REPEATLINK a page should usually only link to another page the first time it's mentioned, not afterwards. i have fixed it on that article but please remember in future. Serprinss (talk) please ping on reply. 06:59, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Noted Thanks. Julie11094 (talk) 07:05, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Hi Julie, I note your comment here that Zalaris is "your company". Please read the paid editing guidelines below and make sure you comply with them before you edit any further. Note this is not optional, but a condition that you agreed to when you created an account here, as is true for Balaji Alavuthin who has not yet done so either. Thank you Melcous (talk) 12:52, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments. Will you suggest me.

How to sustain the Semi-product article it's under deletion review. Julie11094 (talk) 13:37, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, I will not discuss anything else with you until you comply with the paid editing disclosure. Thank you Melcous (talk) 14:49, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Melcous, Following format is correct {{paid|user=Julie11094|employer=Zalari}}. All things are new to me. Kindly help to resolve the issue. I will follow your instruction. Julie11094 (talk) 03:22, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Julie11094. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Julie11094. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Julie11094|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Melcous (talk) 12:52, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Zalaris, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Julie11094, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Julie11094|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. scope_creep^Talk 15:16, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep where should I add this tag. as a fresher it's difficult to understand. kindly help me. Julie11094 (talk) 16:53, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Julie11094: Per WP:DISCLOSE and WP:PAID . It states it in the messages above. I've added you to the entry to the coin noticeboard due to your statement about "your company". WP:PAID tells you how to do it in the "How to disclose" section. scope_creep^Talk 17:06, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep is the following format is correct ? {{paid|user=Julie11094|employer=Zalari}} Julie11094 (talk) 03:16, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Coin

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. scope_creep^Talk 16:43, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it has been used to evade blocks on one or more other accounts. (It doesn't make any difference whether this account has been operated by the same person as a previous account, as seems likely, or by another person working for the same business: either way the purpose is to use this account to avoid the effect of the block on another account.) If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock. To do so, first read the guide to appealing blocks, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} to the bottom of the talk page of your original account. JBW (talk) 20:42, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Julie11094 (talk) 03:17, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]