User talk:Juliancolton/Archive 12

Hippo burpday, blue gnus!

YAYYYYYY!!!!! // roux   03:09, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

It's your birthday today? Happy birthday! (Mines coming up, it's on January 2)--Ashbey_{Happy Holidays} Ӝ 03:33, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Yep. :) Thanks, and happy early birthday to you, too. –Juliancolton ^{Happy Holidays} 03:34, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Happy birthday! :) — Aitias // discussion 03:38, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. :) –Juliancolton ^{Happy Holidays} 03:47, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

<Ya'll sing it with me!> Happy Birthday to you...

Happy Birthday to you...

Happy Birthday dear Julian...

Happy Birthday to you!

Hope that it's a good one, pal. :) Allanon ^{♠The Dark Druid♠} 04:06, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Crud, another non-Texan using incorrect Texanese. As the great Kinky Friedman said, "Y'all is singular. All y'all is plural. All y'all's is plural possessive." And it's possesseev, in case all y'all wanted to know.

Happy birthday, Julian! Texan rants, no matter how important, can always be interrupted for some good ol'fashioned southern hospitality. :D —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 04:11, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, all y'all! –Juliancolton ^{Happy Holidays} 04:27, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Happy Birthday - all the best, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 05:53, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

I was planning on asking you when your birthday was. Happy birthday, Julian! :D --Dylan620 _Contribs ^Sign! 12:46, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Oh, and since I just joined WP:BDC, I am liable to give you this:

Hungry? Here's a little snack for you on your birthday, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day, Juliancolton/Archive 12!

--Dylan620 _Contribs ^Sign! 13:08, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Dylan and Ruhrfisch. (I didn't know this many people watch my talk page :)) –Juliancolton ^{Happy Holidays} 15:11, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Happy birthday :) NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 20:37, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

(in other words, thanks!) –Juliancolton ^{Happy Holidays} 21:39, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Something that the birthday boy can help me with

I just finished this up today, and I was wondering if you could help make sure if there's anything missing or needs to be fixed. I used these links to help myself out. (Careful; each word in that last sentence leads to a different link.) --Dylan620 _Contribs ^Sign! 22:33, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, Julian. :-) I just have to categorize it properly, then it will be released into the mainspace. My first article in over a month a millennium. (Yup, I'm making fun of myself.) :P --Dylan620 _Contribs ^Sign! 00:12, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Solomon Sharp FAC

Just wanted to touch base with you on your comments regarding my featured article nomination of Solomon P. Sharp. Were my edits there sufficient to address your concerns? If so, would you mind striking them through so the featured article director can see that they have been addressed? Do you feel you can now support the article's promotion to FA? Acdixon ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 04:38, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Hurricane Karl (1998) GA passage

I reviewed the article and looks fine by me, so I passed it. Do you know of any reasons why articles within our project haven't been reviewed as quickly as they have been last month? In October and November, it didn't seem like we could keep 5 GA nominees active at the same time. Now they're accumulating. Thegreatdr (talk) 18:23, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Just a random question

Are storms supposed to travel this fast? (This was on a warning message today)

* AT 1237 PM CST...NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE METEOROLOGISTS DETECTED A
 LINE OF SEVERE THUNDERSTORMS CAPABLE OF PRODUCING DESTRUCTIVE WINDS
 IN EXCESS OF 80 MPH.  THESE STORMS WERE LOCATED ALONG A LINE
 EXTENDING FROM DEER CREEK TO 2 MILES SOUTHWEST OF STANFORD TO 3
 MILES EAST OF BEASON...OR ALONG A LINE EXTENDING FROM 7 MILES
 SOUTHWEST OF EUREKA TO 15 MILES WEST OF BLOOMINGTON TO 10 MILES
 WEST OF CLINTON...AND WAS MOVING WEST AT 210 MPH.

Inferno, Lord of Penguins 19:09, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

I thought as much, seeing as the other storms were travelling at 60-75mph. Pretty bad typo if you ask me o.O Inferno, Lord of Penguins 19:54, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Well, I just checked on those storms again, they are travelling about 80-85mph in reality. Inferno, Lord of Penguins 19:57, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Climate information on countries

What type of climate does each country have?

Where would we find this information?

The Transhumanist    01:19, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Storm information on countries

Which countries have storms, and which ones don't?

Where could we find this information?

The Transhumanist    01:19, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

How are the country adjectivals coming along?

These need to be done before the country outlines can be moved into article space, because as they stand now, many of the links lead to the wrong place (the country article, rather than a page about the adjectival). We really need these. The Transhumanist    01:19, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Please read edits before you revert them

You recently reverted a change I made to the GeekNights topic with the following message to me:

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Geeknights has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 23:36, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Now, the edit I made was a clear removal of obvious vandalism, which I noted clearly. All of the content added was copy/paste vandalism that had nothing to do with GeekNights, and the ONLY changes I made involved a simple reversion to the previous, non-vandalized version. Why did you undo my change, re-adding the vandalism to the page?

69.205.95.68 (talk) 04:51, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Closing script errors?

Are you using a closing script? Could you please do something to make sure all the required edits associated with relisting AFD's get done when you relist? You have a lot of cases tonight where the AFD remains open on the original log. THis causes problems when someone doing closings works off of the WP:OAFD list, and does not notice it was just relisted. Thanks, Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 07:14, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

William D. Boyce

Check out Nishkid64's new lead (I ce'd a bit) and the move of a paragraph I just made (summaries are "move para" and "move para here". — Rlevse • Talk • 13:33, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

User:Dylan620/School

I'm ready to get back to the blocking thing when you are. It's been a few days now. Also, would you mind if I gave you an overview of my admin topics of choice? --Dylan620 _Contribs ^Sign! 14:11, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Also, this IP is making extremely graphic threats. I believe a block is in order. --Dylan620 _Contribs ^Sign! 14:16, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Oops, he's already blocked. --Dylan620 _Contribs ^Sign! 14:19, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Oops indeed. ayematthew @ 14:20, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

@ Julian - Really? But I meant that I wanted you to please review the remainder of my answers to the blocking lesson. --Dylan620 _Contribs ^Sign! 21:41, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Passage of Hermine GA

I fixed the text issues within the article and passed Hermine. I humbly request that within your GAN/GAC/GAR templates that you link to the Meteorology and atmospheric sciences section instead of the Biology section. Linking to the Bio section adds slight complication to removing the article from the GAN/GAC/GAR list. Thank you for your consideration. Thegreatdr (talk) 18:53, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism to Horace Greeley High School

The page has been vandalized again, by the same anonymous IP that you reverted and warned before.

Several months ago, when I was much more active here than I am now, I "knew the ropes" of the warning and blocking policies, and could handle these things effectively. Way out of practice just now, so I might push the wrong button or place the wrong template. Could you take care of this? I promise to read up on current practice. William Ackerman (talk) 23:47, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Re: Portal:Winter

Might be a good idea to start a WP:PPREV, that would be a good forum for myself and also hopefully others to provide some feedback. Cirt (talk) 06:44, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

No worries. Keep me posted. :) Cirt (talk) 16:02, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

PR

Would you mind peer reviewing this article for me? Thanks, ₪Ceran →(cheer→chime →carol) 15:12, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

I've addressed your concerns. Any further suggestions? ₪Ceran →(cheer→chime →carol) 16:06, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Tropical Storm Arlene (1993) reflist change

Just a heads up, I reverted your change to the aforementioned article. There were only three references to begin with, which is totally unnecessary to have in two columns. Cheers. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:07, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Hey, I didn't write the article. I just want it to look nice. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:12, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Recent blocking of user with inappropriate name

Looks like this user allegedly complained to the NAACP because of "racism" and wants to change his username. I am still leery of that user because of his edit to Jimbo's talk page. Willking1979 (talk) 18:27, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Javier Saade

Oh, if this AFD debate is relisted again or closed as no consensus, I'll go crazy!! :) I think the biggest issue is editors don't seem to be revisiting the debate. But perhaps, unlike me, they haven't been trying to get rid of this article for three weeks and have better things to do with their lives. Anyway... I don't expect you to do anything in response to this message, I just needed to vent. Thanks! ;) Somno (talk) 09:37, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

No worries about relisting; I understand the process. Just frustrated that others don't see that there is not even one non-trivial mention of this guy in independent sources. Sigh. :) Somno (talk) 00:42, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Responding to UAA bot reports

First of all, thank you very much for all your work at UAA. It's good to have someone putting effort into reasonably and fairly applying the username policy.

Just one critique -- you often reply to automatic reports of usernames by bots with the UAA templates. The bot doesn't care. It can't read your response. And most bot reports are false positives anyway. Unless you think there's a particular reason to leave the report up for more scrutiny, it's better just to remove the report. rspεεr (talk) 17:09, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Sure, that's fine, that's what they're for. I just think you're being too cautious. If you discuss a bot-reported username with the user, that doesn't really need to be reviewed by anyone else. (If the discussion fails and the user keeps editing, that's when you bring it to RFC/N.) rspεεr (talk) 17:14, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for the rollback rights. I promise to use them appropriately and to not take advantage of them. Have a Happy New Year. Regards Ijanderson (talk) 20:11, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

JULIAN!!!

Stalker! —La Pianista ^(T•C) 05:31, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Well, maybe not. I was pretty bored when I wrote that...sorry. :) —La Pianista ^(T•C) 17:11, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Hello, Juliancolton. You have new messages at La Pianista's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Relisting AFDs

Just a note to bring your attention to WP:RELIST, which changed fairly recently. AFDs are now only relisted if there's only been one or two !votes besides the nominator, and are virtually never relisted twice. If there has been a reasonable level of discussion and contribution but no consensus, the AFD should be closed as "no consensus" rather than relisted. Stifle (talk) 09:40, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Alright, thanks for letting me know. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 14:54, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Holding Pen

On the UAA page, when you say "moving to the holding pen" what does that mean? Reliable Forever^talk 15:33, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

WikiCup

Delivered by neuro^(talk) for Garden and ayematthew at 20:48, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Happy New Year

Dear Juliancolton,
I just wanted to wish you and your family a happy new year, however you're celebrating it. Whether 2008 was a good year for you, or if it wasn't the greatest year, hopefully 2009 will be better. Cheers, and happy editing in 2009 :-),

 Ashbey  Ӝ  00:20, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

A cat to ease all of your troubles		Happy New Year!
		Hey there, Juliancolton! Happy new Gregorian year. All the best for the new year, both towards you and your family and friends too. I know that I am the only person lonely enough to be running this thing as the new year is ushered in, but meh, what are you going to do. I like to keep my templated messages in a satisfactorily melancholy tone. ;) Congratulations to Coren, Wizardman, Vassyana, Carcharoth, Jayvdb, Casliber, Risker, Roger Davies, Cool Hand Luke and Rlevse, who were all appointed to the Arbitration Committee after the ArbCom elections. I am sure I am but a voice of many when I say I trust the aforementioned users to improve the committee, each in their own way, as listed within their respective election statements. Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off to update the 2009 article, heh. Best wishes, neuro(talk) 00:51, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Redirects of non-notable ANTM contestants

Hi Julian, can you please create the redirects of ANTM contestants of protected titles:

Nik Pace → will redirect to America's Next Top Model, Cycle 5
Lisa Jackson (Model) → will redirect to America's Next Top Model, Cycle 9

ApprenticeFan (talk) 01:35, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Contact the created redirect user (Ryan Postlethwaite). He disabled protected titles of April Wilkner, Ann Markley, Bianca Golden, Jade Cole, Jenah Doucette and Kyle Kavanagh. They marked the redirect pages.

Reasons why they protected the page:

• Ann Markley, protected since June 14, 2008 at 14:51 UTC, schedule to expire on June 14, 2009 at 14:51 UTC, see log
• April Wilkner, protected since July 4, 2008 at 00:01 UTC (indefinite), see log
• Jenah Doucette, protected since September 10, 2008 at UTC (indefinite), see log
• Bianca Golden, protected since October 10, 2008 at 20:20 UTC (indefinite), see log
• Kyle Kavanagh, protected since October 13, 2008 (indefinite), see log
• Jade Cole, protected since October 13, 2008 at 13:06 UTC (indefinite), see log —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.96.112.155 (talk) 03:45, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Happy New Year!!!

2009

Happy New Year, Julian! :D --Dylan620 _Contribs ^Sign! 02:01, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Galib is wishing you a Happy New Year. This card promotes WikiLove and hopefully it has made your day much better. Best Wishes and Happy Editing!

Best To Reply At My Talk Page. Thanks.

Just Stopping by. Yours Truly, M.H.^{True Romance iS Dead} 14:58, 1 January 2009 (UTC) .

Thanks

Dear Julian, many sincere thanks for contributing to my RfA. Rest assured, I am in no hurry to click on the extra tabs, but I'm sure they will eventually be a great help in all I want to do for this noble cause. I didn't like being in the spotlight and I will not be sending messages to all who took part—live is too short—but I felt your comments gave credence to the process. Thanks again, and Happy New Year. Graham. Graham Colm ^Talk 17:12, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Dear Juliancolton,

Wishing you a happy new year, and very best wishes for 2009. Whether we were friends or not in the past year, I hope 2009 will be better for us both.

Kind regards,

Majorly talk 21:17, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Dear Juliancolton, I hope you had a wonderful New Year's Day, and that 2009 brings further success and happiness! ~ YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 05:06, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks again for your hard work on FAC spotting my errors and faults. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 05:06, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Fair User Rationale Problems

Hi, a photo which I uploaded, File:51TgbAN-nFL. SL500 AA240 .jpg, has recently been the cause of a fair use rationale dispute, saying that it needs updating. However, I cannot find anything wrong with the current one. If you could please look at it, I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you, ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 14:10, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

I think this was the problem.--Patton123 17:50, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Shortfin Mako

Shortfin Mako is no longer being actively edited by students involved in the Wikipedia:WikiProject AP Biology 2008. This student has opted out of the program for second semester. Hopefully, they did no damage during their brief experience with Wikipedia - the article were stubs and in poor condition on their arrival; however, I will look it over. My apologies for any inconvenience this may have caused. I had some initial doubts about the level of commitment among my students; however, the second semester should consist of a more focused group much reduced in numbers. Academic natural selection of sorts. Again - thank you for your support in this project -hopefully it will not discourage your enthusiasm for future projects of this nature. --JimmyButler (talk) 03:13, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Your listing at your WikiCup subpage

Hi, you listed an article for Good article at your subpage, please add the necessary information just added at the main submission page. Thanks, ayematthew @ 21:01, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009

Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 45	24 November 2008	About the Signpost

From the editor: 200th issue
ArbCom elections: Candidate profiles	News and notes: Fundraiser, milestones
Wikipedia in the news	Dispatches: Featured article writers — the inside view
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 46	1 December 2008	About the Signpost

ArbCom elections: Elections open	Wikipedia in the news
WikiProject Report: WikiProject Solar System	Features and admins
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 5, Issue 1	3 January 2009	About the Signpost

From the editor: Getting back on track
ArbCom elections: 10 arbitrators appointed	Virgin Killer page blocked, unblocked in UK
Editing statistics show decline in participation	Wikipedia drug coverage compared to Medscape, found wanting
News and notes: Fundraising success and other developments	Dispatches: Featured list writers
Wikipedia in the news	WikiProject Report: WikiProject Ice Hockey
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Weather phenomenon

Glad to see our signatures have something in common :) —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 23:22, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Lockdown passed

I want to say thank you for any comments you left during the FAC review of Lockdown (2008). It recently passed and I want to thank you for the advice during the review which got it closer to passing.--WillC 01:53, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #23

The November–December issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 03:17, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Eh?

How come you deleted WP:NOTNOW? (the shortcut, not the essay itself) EVula // talk // ☯ // 21:32, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

was wondering the same thing... I see no indication that Pedro made said request, but even if he had, the main essay and the redirect are too well known to simply delete like that... especially by somebody who frequents RfA's and knows how many times that redirect gets used.---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloonCSD Survey Results 21:34, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Whoops, my mistake; I created WP:NOTEVER as a quick joke in relation to an off-wiki discussion, and when I went to delete it, I must have hit the wrong page. Apologies, –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 21:36, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

iMatthew // talk // 21:44, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

No worries, I figured it was something like that, hence the revert before asking you. No harm, no foul. EVula // talk // ☯ // 23:19, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Regarding your concern about my username - Alexknight

Thanks for your welcome,

First let me tell you how I came up with this username, I'm from the city of Alexandria, Egypt (hence Alex), and I have (you can say childish) fondness of knights. Also let me assure you that I had no idea of the existence of Alexknight12 (by the way, there is also an AlexKnight99) at the time I created my account and I had no intention of masquerading as Alexknight12 or Alexknight99 or whomever. I just chose a username and it was not reserved.

Now, after explaining why I chose this username, I must also say that I don't like the idea of changing it, specially that this was my sixth or seventh trial to come with a meaningful and personal username. I also believe that although both names look similar but they are easily distinguishable for anyone internet user.

Best wishes and regards, Alexknight (talk) 10:44, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Sebastian Bonnet

Greetings,

I am shocked and apalled at the deletion of the Sebastian Bonnet article. Not only were the appropriate persons not informed, but a simple Google test shows

Results 1 - 10 of about 30,400 for "Sebastian Bonnet". (0.14 seconds)

Over 30,000 hits, or the other way, 79,000 hits:

Results 1 - 10 of about 79,700 for Sebastian+Bonnet. (0.06 seconds)

Some editors on Wikipedia are typically on a crusade against porn, and gay porn in particular.

There is simply no justification for this deletion. And remember, Wikipedia is not a vote. I suggest you undo this and re-list for a fuller discussion, or take this to deletion review.Ryoung122 11:36, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sebastian Bonnet, which had consensus to delete the article. Julian was just carrying out the technical deletion. If you dispute the deletion, please see deletion review, or ask him to restore the article into your userspace, so you can continue working with it. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 11:40, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Georgia

Hi Julian, just to let you know that Georgia is a disambiguation page, and should not normally be linked to. Use Georgia (U.S. state) for the American state. Best wishes, DuncanHill (talk) 13:39, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Sebastian Bonnet

Within hours of your closing the AfD on Sebastien Bonnet, another editor recreated it. That can't be right, can it? The new version has no reliable sources either. David in DC (talk) 12:27, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

I've speedied it - the AfD was held and closed properly so CSD#G4 applies. This early it should have gone to deletion review (which I suspect that it would greatly fail, since the consensus was obvious, rather than being recreated). Cheers, CP 17:23, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Hurricane Katrina Article

Footnote #19 is a dead link. A valid link exists at http://jjic.gov.state.la.us/Press_Release_detail.asp?id=976, but apparently I'm not sufficiently "established" an editor to fix this. Please update it when you have a moment.

Best regards,

*Septegram*Talk*Contributions* 19:01, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Apocalypse

Will occur on Easter, 2008. Foreseen by Ceranthor, some writer with no sense of reality. Be afraid, and if you don't believe me, when it happens, I told you so! Byee. ₪Ceran →(cheer→chime →carol) 23:10, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Lol, let's hope so. By then I'll probably be locked up in an asylum, because I'll have lost my mind seeing the future. Lol, gtg soon so bye. ₪Ceran →(cheer→chime →carol) 23:15, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

WP:MOTD

Please see Wikipedia_talk:Motto_of_the_day/Nominations#Running_dry Simply south not SS, sorry 12:36, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Deletion review for Sebastian Bonnet

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Sebastian Bonnet. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedy-deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Ryoung122 13:36, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

DYK for 1941 Florida hurricane

On January 6, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1941 Florida hurricane, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Backslash Forwardslash 15:15, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

ADCO

Hey, it's me, here to remind you to tend to my ADCO page. Thank you in advance. UntilItSleeps PublicPC 15:56, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Pokity poke :D. *Pokes until finger snaps in half* Hehe. Just stopping by. 1 question down, 1 to go. Oh, and by the way, you have a comment from an IP that posted at the very top of your talk page. Cheers! UntilItSleeps PublicPC 20:32, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Ok, just thought you might wanna know. Talk to you later. UntilItSleeps PublicPC 20:39, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

The old 2001 AHS timeline

Might as well finish what I started. It's time to restart efforts to get Timeline of the 2001 Atlantic hurricane season to FL-Class. This would be via the A to FL chapter of the old improvement directory. I'll go ask Cyclonebiskit and Hurricanehink if they would like to help out with this last leg. --Dylan620 (Contribs · Sign!) 13:16, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Alright, the A-FL page is up. Now to go inform Hink and Cyclonebiskit. --Dylan620 (Contribs) 19:42, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Air Blue destinations

I'm updating article and adding refrences.116.71.42.1 (talk) 17:36, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

A contest you may be interested in

Hello, Juliancolton. There is a new contest for U.S. and Canada roads that you may be interested in. To sign up or for more information, please visit User:Rschen7754/USRDCRWPCup. The contest begins Saturday at 00:00 UTC. Regards, Rschen7754 (T C) 01:30, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Part

I noticed that you missed Template:Nicholas Zebrun Films while deleting the listed pages in this AfD. Just thought I should ask you this instead of speedy tagging it. ^LeaveSleaves 03:34, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

A note from the GACC

Hi there Juliancolton!
	The Good Article Collaboration Center has been restarted, and since you are a member, we are asking for your help in making the articles Seinfeld, Sarah Palin, and President of the United States good articles. We hope to see you there. Cheers. --LAAFansign review 19:06, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

• Notice delivery by xenobot 13:50, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Flagged Revs

Hi,

I noticed you voted oppose in the flag revs straw pole and would like to ask if you would mind adding User:Promethean/No to your user or talk page to make your position clear to people who visit your page :) - Thanks to Neurolysis for the template   «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l»  (talk) 07:12, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

That's an ugly and confronatational template IMO.--Patton^t/c 16:43, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Eh, I have to agree. My userbox is sufficient. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 18:50, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

New antisemitism

Hi Julian.  :) Looks like we may have inadvertently cross-posted. I'd recently made a determination of consensus at Talk:New antisemitism,[1] so the edit war had stopped. I don't think page protection there is required anymore, so would you have any objection to reversing it? --Elonka 20:26, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Typhoon Tip

I would strongly suggest that you link to the TCWC Jakarta Best Track for Tip instead of making people wade through that massive file the JMA have on their website.Jason Rees (talk) 01:32, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Noys

Hi, you closed this AfD discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noys, and deleted the article. As you will see from the discussion I had asked for Alpha Team to be included in the discussion as I felt that article had the same issues. As the result was Delete could you delete that article too? --Deadly∀ssassin 02:29, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Omai

Wut?

//roux   16:30, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Snow

I would have thought that Mr. Tropical Cyclone could handle a few snowflakes. Hopefully it's not bad and you can still make it. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 20:24, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey! There's only supposed to be one inch of snow on the ground by midnight tomorrow - [2]. Tell your dad that. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 03:41, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Page moves

I replied over at my user talk, out of old habbit. --Eivind (t) 22:18, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Rainband

The ref issue has been dealt with. Thegreatdr (talk) 23:46, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)

The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:30, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

WP:WPTC

I'm sorry, but I thought that all WP:WIKIPROJECTs used the List class. Cheers, and good luck in the the cup. I'm 2nd on the waiting list. Cheers, Jonathan321 (talk) 14:31, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Deletion request

Hey, when you have a free moment, can you please delete Harptallica: A Tribute? It was included in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harptallica. Thanks. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:41, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Flatpoint High School AFD

I'm a bit confused as to why the general notability guideline, which states plainly that trivial mentions do not constitute significant coverage, was not applied to this AFD. Otto4711 (talk) 23:06, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

• Well that answer certainly clears this right up. Putting in for DRV although I suppose it will be fruitless. Otto4711 (talk) 23:15, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Obadiah

You recently closed the deletion discussion on Obadiah School of the Bible as merge. I've merged the most relevant bits here [[3]]. What's the next step? I've never dealt with a merge situation before. Thanks and go well.Bali ultimate (talk) 01:56, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

You're fast. I think i've done it here [[4]]. History is still live, so it's not an automatic redirect (not sure what it's supposed to be). If all is well and you're busy, no need to reply. Thanks for taking the time.Bali ultimate (talk) 02:02, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Tropical Storm Kay (2004)

On January 11, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tropical Storm Kay (2004), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 10:19, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

pressure/speed

is there a direct, negative relationship b/w the air pressure in a hurricane and its wind speed? Tks Ling.Nut ^{(talk—WP:3IAR)} 10:52, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation on my talk. I must have overlooked that explanation in Tropical cyclone. Could you point it out to me, please? Ling.Nut ^{(talk—WP:3IAR)} 16:07, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

I've read that section, and the clear bits didn't seem to include any version of your explanation. I'm hinting/hoping you'll take a look yourself and add any missing fundamental info. Thanks. Ling.Nut ^{(talk—WP:3IAR)} 16:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Interstate 84 in New York

I saw you commented on the talk page (I replied at some length). But please do feel free to add to the article (I've finished the route description, usually my major contribution to a road article). I saw that Patterson history page you linked to from Talk:Interstate 84 (east) ... we absolutely have to have that helicopter crash in there! That's unusual, and might make a great DYK hook (there are some other more (ahem) pedestrian possibilities). Daniel Case (talk) 20:10, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

Delivered by The Helpful One for Garden and iMatthew at 00:03, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

You're invited!

New York City Meetup Next: Sunday January 18th, Columbia University area Last: 11/01/2008

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, look at our approval by the Chapters Committee, develop ideas for chapter projects at museums and libraries throughout our region, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the November meeting's minutes and the December mini-meetup's minutes).

We'll make preparations for our exciting museum photography Wikipedia Loves Art! February bonanza (on Flickr, on Facebook) with Shelley from the Brooklyn Museum and Alex from the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

We'll also be collecting folks to join our little Wikipedia Takes the Subway adventure which will be held the day after the meeting.

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:20, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 5, Issue 2	10 January 2009	About the Signpost

News and notes:Flagged Revisions and permissions proposals, hoax, milestones	Wikipedia in the news
Dispatches: December themed Main Page	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 19:42, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Please don't delete my page

You requested that my page "Chiral lewis acid" be deleted. I'm designing a wikipedia page for a graduate level physical organic chemistry project and the topic I've (regretfully) been assigned is chiral lewis acids in asymmetric synthesis. It's my first time using wikipedia and I'm on a tight deadline so please show a little mercy. It'll be on it's way to being a good page in a matter of minutes.

Thanks, Mike

00:02, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!

The Helpful One is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

00:02, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Merry christmas.

Until It Sleeps is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

00:02, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Ice trees!

Hi ! That is my front yard in Latham NY -Zep4life 00:02, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Feliz Navidad

Sunderland06 (talk) is wishing you happy holidays! This greeting promotes WikiLove and holiday wishes. Hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a season's greetings, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Juliancolton/Holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

00:02, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Weird that the first came from India and the second came from Ireland. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:30, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

It is indeed weird, although I find it hard to believe the two weren't related, especially considering they were within a couple minutes of each other. Cheers, –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 17:33, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Right, that's what I mean. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:37, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

In any event, the vandalism seems to have stopped, but if it gets bad let me know and I can semi-protect it. :) –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 17:41, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Actually, I think I know the reason for the vandalism... –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 17:44, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

And now one from Canada: please don't protect, I'd rather try to track down where it's coming from first. (Something to do with 4chan and Ebaum.com ... ) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Allright, I just found the AN/I threads. What about User talk:Giggy? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:05, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Good idea; I left Giggy a note here. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 18:07, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

You have his page watched, no? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:58, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

I do, but I usually only check my watchlist in the morning and a couple of times during the day, so it would be easier for him to ping me on my talk page. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 21:00, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

User:Ebaumsnigra at WP:UAA

"Ebaumsnigra " is a typical 4chan term. It refers to Ebaum's World (considered a rival by 4chan) and to a racist term. This account is probably part of 4chan users' preparations for 4chan being on the front page. Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 23:55, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

5.999... approaches, but does not equal 6

wondered how long that would last. Dlohcierekim 23:56, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Class for articles concerning clean up tags

Where in the criteria concerning the class of an article does it say that clean up tags require an article to be start class? Last I checked, only GA articles cannot have a clean up tag. I was working under the assumption that Allen is a C class article, as it is missing a section people consider important (though that information appears to lie NOWHERE online, including the NHC references.) Just curious, because it seems like anytime some tries to upgrade anything to C class lately (barring articles up for GA), there are a few editors downing articles to Start, normally out of habit or preference rather than anything stated in the article class criteria. Lowering article class does negatively impact the wikiwork of this project. Thegreatdr (talk) 23:59, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Barry

Thanks. I live in the thing's footprint. I was hoping to work it into the Great Gale of 1848 article as an example of the "worst case scenario" we worry about during hurricane season, but could not find RS that would say it followed that path. So I keep it for the pretty colors. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 00:06, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Semiprotection

Don't worry about me, I'll be fine. Thanks for the offer though. :) Giggy (talk) 01:41, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

MfD closes

Thanks for closing discussions at MfD. Just a note, {{mfdtop}} goes above the header, something unusual to MfD because the way we transclude entire discussions to a single page I think, or maybe just tradition. Thanks.--Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 03:32, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Just for the record

Your mother is not ugly and her username is not in the spam filter. :) davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 03:34, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Subtle barnstar of good humor

		The Subtle Barnstar of Good Humor
		I award you 0.999... of a subtle barnstar of good humor for this edit. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 03:56, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Relisting AFDs

Just a reminder that per WP:RELIST, AFDs should only be relisted a second time in very exceptional circumstances. If several editors have contributed to an AFD which has already been relisted once and there is no agreement on what should be done, the AFD should be closed as no consensus rather than relisted again. Stifle (talk) 12:58, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

I try to keep a limit of four or five "votes"; is that reasonable? –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 13:51, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

WP:RELIST contemplates anything more than two people plus the nominator as being enough, and says "If a debate has already been relisted once, the closer should consider carefully if a no-consensus close would be more appropriate than a second relisting. If further discussion is unlikely to bring consensus, then the discussion should simply be closed". As such, I suspect that once a debate has already been relisted, if there's four or more "votes" including the nominator but no clear result, no consensus is the correct outcome. Stifle (talk) 14:23, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Fair enough, I'll take note of that in the future. Cheers, –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 14:31, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Username

Looks like a valid block to me. Is "whore" generally considered borderline? If it is, I'll unblock the account. Thanks. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 18:35, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

LOL! I'm good with that. I'll unblock it with the caveat that he should consider a less, um, spicy choce of names. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 18:39, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

You da man, as I've pointed out before. Thanks and take care. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 18:47, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

My favorite administrator...

...would you mind doing me a favor? (Just thought I'd butter you up a little bit before asking *grin*) Someone recently slapped a copyvio tag on Heck horse. I rewrote the article with sources at the designated temp page, but it says an admin has to be the one to put it back. Would you mind terribly? Thank you! Dana boomer (talk) 19:24, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

		The Admin's Barnstar
		Thank you for your always fast response time and continual willingness to help! Dana boomer (talk) 19:41, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Whoo! I'm so proud! Go Julian! (and still such a shame I missed your RfA). Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 19:44, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Heh, thanks! –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 20:01, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: J.delanoy's talk: IRC

Stop Huggling!? But it's... so boring in here! Besides all the other high schoolers in this class are just surfing the net or playing games :P UntilItSleeps PublicPC 20:59, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Sounds like a productive class </sarcasm> –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 21:01, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Lol. Electronics is a productive class... sort of. All we do is read out of a book for now... It's later in the term that we actually do any sort of work. So I'm Huggling, read a paragraph, Huggle, read another paragraph. :D. UntilItSleeps PublicPC 21:06, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Tropical cyclone reply

I looked at that message and responded: huh? Therefore, you deserve:

		The Guidance Barnstar
		For answering a nearly incomprehensible message on the tropical cyclone talk page. Huzzah! Thegreatdr (talk) 01:24, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 14, 2009

Thanks for the tweaks :) I'm not used to do it but the text seemed a bit too much outdated. I have expanded it a little bit (my text was 200 chars shorter). -- lucasbfr ^talk 14:46, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Juliancolton, I noticed you move-protected Chocolate Rain because it's linked from 4chan; I just filed a request for 24-hour semi-protection because the article is being heavily vandalized (probably because of traffic from the TFA). I didn't noticed before that you had already move-protected the article; would you be able to look into the semi-protection request as well? The request is here. Politizer ^talk/_contribs 15:20, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Never mind the above message; someone else just protected it. Thanks, Politizer ^talk/_contribs 15:26, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

 Done :P -- lucasbfr ^talk 15:27, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Before few minutes I edited "robert prosinecki" page, and you reverted it, try to see last two external links, they are linked to the same video on youtube. I erased the last one, and renamed next to the last, to avoid confusion. Regards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.3.99.136 (talk) 17:26, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

List of minor Ranma ½ characters (anime)‎

Hello,

I know you deleted this page per the AFD vote, but I was wondering if you could put it into my userspace, as it doesn't look like it was migrated over into the Wikia per my suggestion before being deleted. Thanks. --BrokenSphere^{Msg me} 19:30, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Retirement from RFA

I'd like to direct you to the explanation at my talk page; I hope I don't make a stink but I really do think the RFA process is biased and ineffective. Basically, if User X were to run for an RFA right now, he/she might get 30 support !votes before someone even evaluates them. It's all about popularity. Best, Ceran^→→ 22:26, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Back from the grave

I see that Bishop's University Economics Society, which you deleted on January 4, has reappeared. What do we do in such a case? Unschool 06:16, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Soggy biscuit

Someone started a DRV on the latest AFD you closed for this article. Could you head over and share your reasoning behind the closure? - Mgm|^(talk) 08:49, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Trolling

You really think my edits were trolling? They weren't, like, what everyone was thinking when reading the thread? 194.75.236.70 (talk) 15:01, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

'Yes' as in, you thought what I wrote was truthful? Isn't it the obvious thing to say when somebody comes on the main talk page itself saying they want to write about their mom? 'Trolling' is saying the obvious in this case, I think! 194.75.236.70 (talk) 15:08, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

You don't believe somebody should tell these people that really NOBODY cares about their mums? No, honestly. He seemed to be some pompous person who thought Wikipedia could be used for personal genealogy or something. That speedy deleting articles on his mum was unfair... like, really WHO CARES about his mum?! Do you? 194.75.236.70 (talk) 15:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Your closing of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaafar Aksikas

Hi. You recently closed the above AfD as "no consensus" (which in practice amounts to "keep"), and I was wondering if you would mind explaining your reasoning for this? It is true that the numbers of !votes in both directions were similar, but as far as I can tell, there were 7 established editors (including the nominator) arguing for deletion mainly on grounds of non-notability, while all but one of the 5 "keep" !votes were from single-purpose accounts, quite possibly socks. Moreover, none of the arguments offered for "keep"ing, when challenged, seemed to stand up to scrutiny:

• No evidence was produced that the online journal that the subject co-founded and edits (with only two issues published so far) is considered a "major well-established journal in its subject area", as required by the relevant WP:PROF guideline.
• The only coverage of the subject in independent media consists of two trivial mentions (just name and affiliation, in a list of speakers at a local event) and one peripheral mention of that same event in a letter to the editor. Yet this coverage was boldly asserted to "meet WP:PEOPLE easily", twice.
• No evidence was produced that the organization that the subject represents in Chicago would be considered Wikipedia-notable at all, let alone so notable that being one of its area directors or a regional representative (not even a member of the national board) would in itself confer notability.

All in all, I don't see how the subject could be considered notable under either the WP:PROF or general WP:BIO guidelines. So before raising the matter at Deletion Review, I was hoping that you'd either reconsider closing the debate as "no consensus", or point out some relevant aspect that I may have missed. Thanks, Hqb (talk) 20:39, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

OK, thanks for the answer. Given the muddled situation, I hope you don't mind if I ask for a relisting through DRV, then? Hqb (talk) 21:01, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Deletion review for Jaafar Aksikas

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Jaafar Aksikas. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedy-deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Hqb (talk) 21:37, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Epic fail? Vandal?

? —Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 20:54, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

:P Poor Julian. :) —Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 20:57, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Jake Wartenberg

Hey. :) I always thought user talk pages are not protected indefinitely? — Aitias // discussion 21:44, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Rollback

Just a FYI - [5] - seems to be a touch too keen for the tool....! Pedro :  Chat  21:50, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Cyclone Charlotte

Right, I have a ton of references for this and decent content, I know you are the man for tropical cyclones, and I was wondering if you would like to create it and get it to a GA with me, no matter if you are too busy, I will have a go, but just a suggestion!  :) Andy (talk) 22:57, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Me and Jason Rees are collaborating on this and he has got an upcoming vesion in his space, so we could start there, and all 3 of us work on it, get it done 3 times quicker! :) Andy (talk) 11:05, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Notice

Since the mainspace appears to be slipping farther away from me with each passing minute, and because a little time off could be beneficial, I'm thinking about going on a self-inflicted wikibreak. There's this tool called the WikiBreak Enforcer, and I'm heading over to WP:VPT to ask how to use it. I plan to return in early February. Good luck, see you in 2-3 weeks, Dylan620 (Contribs) 13:45, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

It is kinda long; reducing to one week. --Dylan620 (Contribs) 15:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Kanonkas

Thank you Julian for voting in my successfully closed RfA! I'm glad that you trust me. Ping me if you need anything! Best regards, --Kanonkas :  Talk  18:20, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 17, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 5, Issue 3	17 January 2009	About the Signpost

News and notes: New board members, changes at ArbCom	Wikipedia in the news
Dispatches: Featured article writers—the 2008 leaders	WikiProject Report: WikiProject Pharmacology
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 23:45, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of terms of endearment (2nd nomination)

How did you come up with a 'no consensus' closure here? seresin ( ¡? )  00:23, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Userfying is not precluded by deletion (indeed, it only comes after deletion). The merge suggestions would not be affected by deletion: common terms can be added to the article without consulting the page, and there was nothing to merge. Please reconsider your closure. seresin ( ¡? )  00:35, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Which ones were those? The first one didn't address the the argument that it's an indiscriminate list that is unverified, the second one had no basis at all in policy. seresin ( ¡? )  00:41, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

"[U]seful, encyclopaedic list" is not a good argument, it has zero basis in policy whatsoever. I have taken the AfD to DRV. seresin ( ¡? )  00:54, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Timeline of the 1997 Pacific hurricane season

Your FLC nomination of the above article has received comments from reviewers that have gone unresolved for quite some time, when you have a chance, please visit the nomination page to respond to these comments.--Truco 00:26, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Leonardo?

G'Day!

A little cyclone is brewing at [6]. I believe I should have informed you but I wasn't sure who had done the deletion.

But let me also inform you, Mate, you don't seem to even know what day it is! I'ts Sunday, beeyootiful Sunday in the Great South Land! The sun is shining, the sea is brilliant blue and we are going to the local agricultural show! Hooroo! Amandajm (talk) 00:36, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

From my vantage point, it has been Sunday for the last 19 hours or so! Amandajm (talk) 08:13, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

BUES

Why did you delete this article, this is a credible organization and the page fit Wikipedia guidelines as best as I can understand them. Please restore the page ASAP. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BUES (talk • contribs) 20:22, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Copyedit please

I was hearten to see "If you've come to ask for a copyedit, peer review, or FAC review, don't hesitate!" when editing you talk page. Would it be possible for you to copyedit and/or contribute to the peer review of Premiere (The O.C.). I am pushing for FA but haven't attempted one before and would be greatful for any assistance. Many thanks, Rambo's Revenge (talk) 23:33, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much, I was a bit embarassed with all the mistakes. Just out of interest did you notice anything that might be problematic at FAC. Also I've heard they are quite strict on 1 a. is there anything/anyone you can suggest that might be able to help with that. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 00:26, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

RE: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Our Neck Of The Woods

Regarding this AfD which you closed as "delete"; there is an article at Our Neck of the Woods which has had an AfD tag linking to this discussion since 3 January. Do you think you could look into it please? PC78 (talk) 00:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Ron Saggers with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948

Unfortunately, it does, because there was no source to rank all the performances in terms of statistical %, so I had to list down all the 34 scorecards individually to show that the numbers for that match were numerically superior to all the other ones. YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 23:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC) Thank you for the clarification. :) –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 23:15, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

I think my informal check showed about 260 footnotes including repeats for 14 k of prose. I think that might be some record....YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 23:25, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

<references />

Could you please stop changing every page with <references /> to {{reflist|2}}. There is no consensus or policy in favor of reflist, and certainly not for two columns or more. Thanks!
—Apis (talk) 02:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry but I think you are mistaken in this case. There is no reason to prefer reflist. And multiple columns should be used for shortened footnotes.
—Apis (talk) 02:25, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

In fact since reflist results in a smaller font size, there is good reason to avoid it.
—Apis (talk) 02:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

No it's not, please stop. How did you come to this conclusion?
—Apis (talk) 02:44, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

It says no such thing, this is the first paragraph of the {{reflist}} documentation: "Use this template to create a reference list in small font for an article. Note that there is no consensus that small font size should always be used for all references; when normal-sized font is more appropriate on an article, use <references /> instead".
—Apis (talk) 03:03, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

No, that's clearly not what it says. In general {{reflist}} with multiple columns is great if you use shortened footnotes. In other cases it just reduces text-size and that makes the reference section harder to read, i.e. less accessible, for many. There is no benefit from reducing the size of the reference section in itself.
—Apis (talk) 03:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zettai Kakusei Tenshi Misutoresu Fōchun

This AfD closed as "userfy" but the article is still in the main space. Wasn't sure how userfy worked in this case, since I've never seen an AfD closed with that result. :) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 03:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Fixed by me. I just moved the article to User:Kelakagandy/Zettai Kakusei Tenshi Misutoresu Fōchun and I have tagged the redirect for deletion. NuclearWarfare _(Talk) 04:26, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. And  Done, redirect deleted –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 04:37, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks both :) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 04:40, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Sock Case

Hello. As you have blocked User:Lieingbastard, I'm just here to notify you about this Sock puppet investigation. Feel free to comment, if needed. Thanks, ~ Troy (talk) 05:14, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Jo Graham

Hi, You closed the AfD discussion on this article as "No consensus": should you also have removed the AfD banner from the article? PamD (talk) 17:13, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Civility

See the latest activity at User talk:Shannon Rose. It looks like she is aiming for martyrdom. --Orlady (talk) 18:05, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Flagged revisions/Trial/Votes

Please add the lock icon to the page you protected - Wikipedia talk:Flagged revisions/Trial/Votes - Thank you Dbiel ^(Talk) 02:46, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for adding it. It was too easy for someone to think that it was OK to discuss the results on this page since the results were posted outside of the "do not modify box" Dbiel ^(Talk) 02:55, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Collaboration with Axis powers during WWII

Dear Julian,

Do you find accusation, that forced laborers were collaborators other than ridiculous ? Which serious scholar, researcher or what person of a sound mind would connect those two words "forced" and "collaboration" ? Thank you.200.193.129.125 (talk) 16:27, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Article needs your help, quick!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storm_in_Northern_Spain_and_Southwest_France,_2009

Help! Article needs your help before it gets killed! Chergles (talk) 18:11, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. The article is in such awful shape now but it has potential as it is the worst in a decade. Thanks for your continued help! Chergles (talk) 23:41, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Request to review minor error

Would you mind taking a look at this? DanielCase has indicated you started WikiProject Hudson Valley and I was hoping you'd know how to fix the error I reference there.

And on a side note, for the new WikiProject, it has been requested we still go through a nom process. Would you mind commenting on the nomination page?

That you very much! ~ ωαdεstεr16_«talk^stalk» 21:26, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People Skipped From the British Throne

People Skipped From the British Throne got moved to People excluded from the British Throne midway through the AFD. The moved article still exists. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 23:23, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

 Done. Deleted the article. --Kanonkas :  Talk  23:26, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Kanonkas. :) –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 23:32, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Copyright question

Hey Julian. I'm wondering if links to this, this, and this could be accepted as external links at La Plus que Lente. They're all old videos, and one of them is reduced to only an image and music from a piano roll. But I'd still like to make sure. Thanks in advance. —La Pianista ^(T•C) 02:56, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 24, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 5, Issue 4	24 January 2009	About the Signpost

Jimbo requests that developers turn on Flagged Revisions	Report on accessing Wikipedia via mobile devices
News and notes: New chapters, new jobs, new knight and more	Wikipedia in the news: Britannica, Kennedy, Byrd not dead yet
Dispatches: Reviewing featured picture candidates	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Delivered at 04:23, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot (Disable)

Feedback

at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/1970 Tonghai earthquake. Thanks Ceran^→//forge 13:31, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting my error at Anthony "Tony Two Guns" Oberto. It was definitely not a speedy, I think the lack of sleep is getting to me. » \ / (⁂) 16:36, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

17:31, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey Julian ;)

Hi Julian. I recently got an article Monarchies in the Americas to good article status and was wondering if it were possible to get it to FA status. I have absolutely no experience in the FA area and was told it'd be better to get some friendly advice or a peer review first. I checked the FA area for someone to ask and your name sounded familiar (I believe our paths have crossed before, even if only in a minor way!). So really what I'm asking is: Could you take a quick glance at the article and advise me as to whether you think it's even worth submitting for a peer review (I don't wan't to waste everybody's time for nothing, do I!?). Thanks so much, --Cameron* 19:00, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, I really appreciate it! By all means feel free to copyedit. ;) --Cameron* 12:50, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

My name "Adwikistrator8"

Hello, I have a note of you saying about my name could violates wikipedias rules, sorry for the delay in response.
I have red the link you give me, I "could" understand how it is *possible* to be confused with "Administrator".
The reason of the "" is that never thought about it at first :-) and second I have an "8" in the final name, obviously a clearly indication of a alphanumeric nick, which are, representative as luck of authority and on the contrary; vanal or informal.
Explanation of the name:
-Ad (adding)
-wikis (wikipedia)
-trator (popular English suffix for "the who makes the prefix part", as for example : "terminator" (the one who terminat), illustrator (the one who illustrate), infiltrator (the one who infiltrate),etc.
In my case would be "the one who ad to the wiki".
The only authority that I really find it is that looks like the most popular name "terminator" :-D. More than that honestly I didn't found.

I ad to that am not an English native speaker, maybe it could be more confused if you are a native...

I hope that it gets more clear, and show that there is not bad intentation.

By the way, I reemember that I have created and "Adwikistrator" count (without the 8), and now I can not access, it say it even not has an email account ¿?. Could it be that it was "inahabilited" or somethin?.

Further more, in the spanish wiki, I have the "Adwikistrator" nick, you could enter and see my small :-( but not "athorities") countributions. And you could leave a message that I can responde to confirm that I am it.
And also never had a warning like this.
Please confirm that you receive my response.
Greetings

Adwikistrator8.

P.D. Maybe and "AdminXXX" name is clear to be derivated from "Administrator" because its preffix english which is clear. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adwikistrator8 (talk • contribs) 23:09, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J.P. Turner & Company, LLC

Hi Julian,

The above AfD that you closed concerned two articles about essentially the same company. You deleted one of them, but left the second one (J.P. Turner & Company Capital Management, LLC) and the two redirects to it (JP Turner Capital Management and JP Turner Capital) in place. Was there a reason for that? Owen× ☎ 00:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you! I would have deleted them myself, but I don't think it's good form for the nom to close an Afd. Owen× ☎ 02:55, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

User:98.223.164.233

Good faith edits like this one? Not to mention all of the unreferenced changes to birthdates and years. AnyPerson (talk) 03:44, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

You mean like the second-to-last one they made? So if they mix in possibly good ones with a huge array of bad ones, it's okay? AnyPerson (talk) 03:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Instead, Tanthalus removed the listing from WP:AIV without doing anything, apparently based on your comments. AnyPerson (talk) 03:50, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Why? They're allowed to continue vandalism? AnyPerson (talk) 03:54, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

They were vandalizing last night at the very time that I originally reported it to WP:AIV. Did you look at the link I provided above? AnyPerson (talk) 18:10, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Hiya

Hi there. Just thought to let you know that I will sometimes be editing on here. Just letting you know. Cheers, Razorflame 19:18, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Reverting on Königsbrunn

Hi Juliancolton, I saw you reverted an malicious edit from the article "Königsbrunn" a few days ago I would like to ask you a few questions about. You have to know that I am writing a skilled labour about the reliabilty of Wikipedia and therefore extended the article about Königsbrunn (which is my hometown btw^^) and than did some vadalism on it. So if you don't mind answering my questions I would be glad, because it would help me to understand the coherences of the encyclopedia a bit more.

• How did you come to the Königsbrunn article (I mean, the city is not very notable)
• Did you read the complete article or did you spot the vanmdalism at once?
• And, most important, why did you only revert the last of the three vandalism edits and not all of them?

As I said, I'd be glad if you could help me (at best quickly, as I have to hand in my work in 4 days^^)

Cheers, Frusciantor (talk) 20:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your fast answer, you helped me a lot :-) Frusciantor (talk) 21:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

County Route 97 (Rockland County, New York)

I have a question about this article. How does it meet the guidelines in Wikipedia:Notability (highways)? Just because it has a "History" section does not mean it is of "special historical significance". The article is redundant and provides no additional information than is provided in List of county routes in Rockland County, New York (76–118A). Andy 1One (talk) 22:09, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invitation to the Inauguration of Barack Obama

Howdy. Thank you for the closing. Could you come back and adjust your closing notes to include the rationale, which votes you assigned more weight, and how you applied policy? So I can get a better understanding. Kind regards, NonvocalScream (talk) 00:15, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. I'm ok with that. Very best, NonvocalScream (talk) 01:24, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

User:Bumbumcheekhobo

You may want to look at this one, as its one edit was more "butt" related. I left a warning, but usernames isn't my area of expertise, so I'll defer to you. Cheers, Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:39, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

• It didn't have your standard, wait until edits notice and the one edit did fall into the less-than-inspiring-good-faith zone, if you catch my drift. I'll get back to blocking vandals now and leave you alone. :-) Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:45, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Re Thank You

Glad to help out - thanks for the explanation of mudkipz (not that I really get it anyway, but that's just me). Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 01:29, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Full protection for WWE One Night Stand

Hey Julian, since I know I can count on you for protection matters, can you fully-protect WWE One Night Stand, there is an edit war over whether the event will now be called WWE Extreme Rules. User:Mshake3 is avoiding a discussion of consensus at WT:PW and is taking matters into his own hands, and people are up to their 3RR now. Can you revert his edit to leave it in the original version until a consensus is formed, in addition to fully protection until the matter is resolved? Thanks.--TRUCO 02:37, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you so much. You're the best. I couldn't request it at WP:RPP since it was already listed there for semi, so I thought you could do it, and you did! Thanks!--TRUCO 02:53, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

I was mad...

I was mad when you said 'stop vandalizing' How come Frank in 30 Rock got to change a page on Janis Joplin and THAT wasn't reverted?!?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.255.38.26 (talk) 19:53, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

You're an admin?!

I'm rather surprised that an admin would say something like "What sense does it make to remove sourced information?" --NE2 14:24, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

So you stand by the implication that it doesn't make sense to removed sourced information? --NE2 14:27, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

If there's little else to note, maybe it shouldn't be a separate article? I have a very hard time seeing how this error belongs in an encyclopedia, even a specialized one about county roads of New York. --NE2 14:38, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

You haven't explained why a database error belongs in the article. What makes this important enough for an encyclopedia? --NE2 14:45, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

The question isn't "What sense does it make to remove it?" but "What sense does it make to include it?" How does including it improve the article? --NE2 15:01, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Then we're at an impasse, since I see no valid reason for including it. --NE2 16:03, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

DYK may need help

It looks like both editable queues are full, but there's an empty non-editable one. Xasodfuih (talk) 16:58, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Username wjkrape

I am aware of the problems with my username/name and I will change it when I think of something better. Wjkrape (talk) 20:08, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Twin concepts

Hi, what is the procedure when an article, Twin concepts, which has been deleted after discussion, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twin concepts, gets recreated by the original creator? It seems like Vakeger is trying to address the criticism about the article being poorly cited, but in a very strange way: Twin concepts and [edit to my talk page]. Normally, I would just speedy delete again, but there seems to be some level of good faith, so I thought I would ask for your opinion. I'll watch your talk page for a reply, or you can reply on mine. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk)

It looks like you spotted it. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 21:40, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

hi spotty

why do not you delete twin concepts from those articles listed under below? Are you going to disqualify that phrase and recommend the use of dualism instead? Funny guys you are. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=twin+concepts&go=Go If the concept ois the same then it is replaceable. How is that for a definition? Vakeger (talk) 06:53, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

pretty much different

I believe that twin concepts and dualism are not the same, first of all, because dualism is not defined, its crap. See my comment there Twin concepts is not my brainchild, so can do whatever you like, but it is a no brains attitude to lexicography not to answer criticism raised on why you do not have a proper definition of headwords, such as this one or anotehr one I pointed out. keep up the firepower... :-) Vakeger (talk) 21:53, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Wally Findlay Galleries

Perhaps you could keep an eye on this one for me? Wally Findlay Galleries was created and is being edited and promoted by User:Wallyfindlay http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Wallyfindlay Thanks Teapotgeorge^Talk 22:01, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Personal Page.

I want to do a personal page on Wiki of myself. as I was writing it I believe you deleted the page. may I ask what I need to do to prevent that from happening again? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjb406528 (talk • contribs) 22:05, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Why did you delete the California Taxpayers' Association page? I don't understand how an informational piece about what an organization does to inform the public is advertising. Cal-Tax isn't a for-profit business and is not trying to solicit anything. please respond rdbyu21 Rdbyu21 (talk) 22:18, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, as you can see it has nothing to do with an advertisement. Also, the subject is notable because it involves the oldest taxpayer group in california. you have left the posting of other taxpayer groups (eg Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assoc.), but not Cal-Tax. PLEASE EXPLAIN!

rdbyu21Rdbyu21 (talk) 23:05, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

GA Review

Hey, would it be possible for you to review 1968 Illinois earthquake or 1997 Qayen earthquake? Thanks, Ceran^→//forge 15:00, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Could you give me feedback at Glacier Peak's PR? Ceran^→//forge 16:26, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Tropical Depression Ten (2005)

On January 28, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tropical Depression Ten (2005), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 15:41, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Bing Thom Architects Article

Hello - Just wondering if you could provide a more in depth explanation as to why this article was deleted. I read the full A7 clause but credibility and importance I think were made pretty evident in the article that was posted with the portfolio list and external links. --Kathychang (talk) 17:46, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the quick reply.

Responding to your critique of the subject not being notable, as a graduate of architecture, I have used numerous works by Bing Thom Architects' in case studies and research.

They are a reputable Canadian Architecture firm with renown built works at a national and international scale and have been awarded a diverse set of design and architectural awards, such as the Lieutenant-Governor of British Columbia Medal and the Governor General Medal from the Royal Architectural Institute of Canada - the list goes on. I would be able to provide extra content to the article with a full list of these notable distinguishments.

It is difficult for me to understand why it is possible for other firms (of similar caliber or less) such as Cohos Evamy and Diamond and Schmitt Architects to have articles up on Wikipedia. Shouldn't these articles be to the same high standard you are asking?

Please reconsider undeleting this article as you have agreed with me on its credibility and importance and I can add the list of awards to satisfy the notability of the article. --Kathychang (talk) 18:45, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

So adding the list of awards is not sufficient? What can I do at this point in time to undelete the article? Can I rewrite it and repost it? --Kathychang (talk) 18:58, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Cheers mate! --Kathychang (talk) 19:19, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

For putting the NY 30 map in place. --Airtuna08 (talk) 19:32, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Old sandboxes that should be deleted

I've got a bunch just hanging around. If it's not a problem could you delete them? The ones below are redirect pages, so don't delete the page the redirect to. :) They are as follows:

• User:Cyclonebiskit/Hurricane Beta (2005)
• User:Cyclonebiskit/Hurricane Florence (1994)
• User:Cyclonebiskit/Tropcial Depression Eighteen-E
• User:Cyclonebiskit/Tropical Depression 07R (2009)
• User:Cyclonebiskit/Tropical Storm Nana (2008)
• User:Cyclonebiskit/Westchester Tornado of July 2006
• User:Cyclonebiskit/2009 Global Cyclone season impact table
• User:Cyclonebiskit/Hurricane Emily tornado outbreak
• User:Cyclonebiskit/Hurricane Hanna (2008)
• User:Cyclonebiskit/Tropcial Depression Eighteen-E (2008)
• User:Cyclonebiskit/Tropical Depression Auring (2009)
• User:Cyclonebiskit/Typhoon Man-Yi (2008)
• User:Cyclonebiskit/Typhoon Prapiroon (2006)
• User:Cyclonebiskit/list of Sichuan earthquake aftershocks
• User:Cyclonebiskit/Hurricane Hernan (2008)
• User:Cyclonebiskit/Tropical Depression 06R (2009)
• User:Cyclonebiskit/Tropical Storm Eric (2009)
• User:Cyclonebiskit/Typhoon Saomai

Thanks, Cyclonebiskit 20:43, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks again :D Cyclonebiskit 21:04, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Admin Coaching

Hey, could you coach me? I've been waiting at the requests list :/ Cheers. Imperat§ r^(Talk) 01:10, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Heh...no problem. Could you recommend me for an alternate admin coach? Cheers. Imperat§ r^(Talk) 01:34, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! Cheers. Imperat§ r^(Talk) 12:03, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Need help!

Dear Julian

Greetings!

Our recent post on CozyCot has been deleted by your good self. First of all, please accept our sincere apologies as we are new to Wikipedia and may not know well enough about Wikipedia's policies of posting.

We sincerely seek your help in listing CozyCot as a women's site on this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_social_networking_websites

As it is a requirement to have a page dedicated to CozyCot before we could list her in the link above, we have thus encountered your deletion.

On this note, please kindly let us know if you could help us to edit the page CozyCot so that it fulfills the Wikipedia's policies. We are most willing to make a sincere contribution to your efforts.

You may reach me at clemen@cozycot.com.

Thanks so much!

clemen Cozycot (talk) 02:32, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Reheated Cabbage

Could you please take a look at this article when you get a chance? It's tagged with a CSD tag, but I do not believe it meets the criteria. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 03:33, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 03:56, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Eating Us Deleted

May I ask why you deleted a perfectly good page for an upcoming album? Not only was info on the album given out on the band's offical website, blogs are talking about it everywhere. See: http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/news/148765-ack-black-moth-super-rainbow-are-eating-us Goaliedudegreg (talk) 04:40, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of birthday songs

Hi, would you consider restoring List of birthday songs and relisting this AfD? The majority of the "delete" arguments were based on WP:COPYVIO and WP:NOT#LYRICS, which were both addressed by my total rewrite yesterday. After my rewrite, there came 2 deletes and one keep; but one delete was essentially WP:JUSTAPOLICY and a personal opinion, which failed to explain how WP:NOT#DIR or WP:NOT#GUIDE actually applied to this article; and the other failed to address how one would find such articles without a list article functioning as an index to them. While there may have been a consensus to delete before the rewrite, I think there needs to be more discussion on the state of the article to determine consensus after the rewrite. Thank you. DHowell (talk) 06:39, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Re your comment: "Actually, the majority of the delete "votes" were based on WP:NOTDIRECTORY, so I feel my closure was appropriate."

Actually, only 4 out of the 9 "deletes" (10 before Mandsford reversed to keep) used "not a directory" as a rationale, and only one of those came after the rewrite. And the three before the rewrite also brought up the copyvio issue and one brought up lyrics, so it is unclear that they would have argued to delete the rewritten, non-copyright-violating, lyrics-free, article. Since consensus was clear that the copyvio and lyrics issues were the major issues, there was insufficient discussion on the "not a directory" issue. If you're not willing to relist, I will bring to DRV. DHowell (talk) 04:36, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

1998 Comfrey – St. Peter tornado outbreak

Hi there- after a few months break I'd like to make another run at FAC for this article. Do you have any comments or suggestions about if you think it is ready? Rather than put it up for another peer review, I figured I'd just do a quick survey first in case people think one is not needed.

Honestly, I never quite understood what was wrong with it the first time (specifics) but I think I have found a few minor improvements here and there. WxGopher (talk) 05:33, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback

Hi Julian. An editor you delcined yesterday is back again. I've commeneted, but I'd appreciate your input. Pedro :  Chat  14:04, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing that. Good decision, and as you say it can quickly be removed if needed - hopefuly not!! Pedro :  Chat  14:13, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Urgent page protect

Redoubt Volcano, which I promoted to GA a couple weeks ago, is going to be under fire because of an imminent eruption. Could you please, please, protect the article from IPs or something? I'm afraid a blizzard (or hurricane) of vandalism is going to follow. Thanks, Ceran^→//forge 20:18, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Effects of Hurricane Ivan in Jamaica

On January 31, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Effects of Hurricane Ivan in Jamaica, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 02:32, 31 January 2009 (UTC)