User talk:Jordan Chuck

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome!

Hello, Jordan Chuck, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Beyond (Chris Crocker album), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! KTC (talk) 11:12, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Beyond (Chris Crocker album)

The article Beyond (Chris Crocker album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NALBUMS. Entirely WP:CRYSTAL.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KTC (talk) 11:12, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shirley Jeffrey

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shirley Jeffrey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Keystoneridin (speak) 01:33, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Miley Cyrus

Please do not remove references and reverse proper disambiguation. Thank you.  -- WikHead (talk) 09:28, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Nicki Minaj, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you.  -- WikHead (talk) 09:32, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Lady Gaga, without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you.  -- WikHead (talk) 02:50, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Honorific nicknames in popular music, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 03:58, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jessica Mauboy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oz talk 23:43, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sheryl Jean

The article Sheryl Jean has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ... discospinster talk 03:12, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Please do not remove BLPPROD templates, as you did at Sheryl_Jean from articles without adding a reference to a reliable source which confirms at least one fact in the article about the article subject. If you continue to do so, this may be seen as disruptive. If you have any questions, feel free to drop a note on my Talk page. Thanks! --j⚛e deckertalk 05:56, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove Biographies of Living Persons prods from articles without addressing the issue, as you did with Sheryl Jean. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. j⚛e deckertalk 06:02, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Lady Starlight, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Acalamari 12:09, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of highest-grossing concerts

The article List of highest-grossing concerts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources, and the entries don't make any sense; for example, the Voodoo Lounge Tour is the Rolling Stones, not "Tirana Metallic", whoever that is.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster talk 17:04, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Inescapable, without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Oz talk 01:22, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Justin Bieber. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 07:06, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or submit a request for unblock to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Daniel Case (talk) 13:35, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sheryl's poster for her Love & Peace Reloaded Tour in 2011 she known as Sheryl Sharouz then.jpg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:Sheryl's poster for her Love & Peace Reloaded Tour in 2011 she known as Sheryl Sharouz then.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 01:25, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sheryl jean

The article Sheryl jean has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jprg1966 (talk) 07:40, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Psy (rapper), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Hello Jordan Chuck. Please don't add and delete information from the tables at Honorific nicknames in popular music without first carefully previewing the changes you intend. Tables can be tricky, but if you continue make changes that disrupt the table format, without any edit summary justification, this may be seen as disruptive. If you have any questions, feel free to drop a note on my Talk page. Thanks! Martinevans123 (talk) 12:18, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nicki Minaj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lily Allen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alternative (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Taylor Swift, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electronic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:22, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Gaga

I had to remove your addition as there is previous talk page consensus to keep her status as it is now. If you'd like to change that please go to the talkpage and ask there. Thanks. gwickwiretalkedits 04:30, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Carly Rae Jepsen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Pop
Stacie Orrico (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Pop

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Judas (song), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 03:33, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to I Knew You Were Trouble. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:37, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Hello, I'm Webclient101. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Justin Bieber, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Webclient101talk 03:03, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Justin Bieber with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Webclient101talk 03:05, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Believe (Justin Bieber album) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. RA0808 talkcontribs 03:10, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Susan Boyle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Will.i.am, you may be blocked from editing. NeilN talk to me 02:46, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rita Ora, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rock and Pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Widefox; talk 08:27, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Nicki Minaj, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edit [1] broke the reference markup and was reverted by another editor. Many of your edits are disruptive and reverted by other editors. This level of long-term disruption, despite all the feedback you've got from other editors is a concern. Widefox; talk 08:43, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Excuse my using a template (again) but it saves me time finding links for this: Looking through your edits, I couldn't see a single edit summary. You can turn on a warning in your preferences to alert you when you don't provide an edit summary. I advise you do that now to aid you change your behaviour. You also haven't communicated with other editors to discuss any (possibly controversial or multiple genre changing) changes or when you've been reverted all these times etc. These are a requirement. Widefox; talk 09:00, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Jauerbackdude?/dude. 04:57, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Jordan_Chuck"