User talk:Jojohogue04

August 2019

Hello, I'm Aseleste. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Brian Shaw (strongman) have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. – Ase1este^t@lk_c0ntribs 03:39, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Mateusz Kelioskowski

A tag has been placed on Draft:Mateusz Kelioskowski, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
• It is an "attack page", (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
  Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Ase1este^t@lk_c0ntribs 03:42, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Dana White, you may be blocked from editing. – bradv🍁 03:45, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content, as you did at Dana White. – bradv🍁 03:46, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:16, 5 August 2019 (UTC)