User talk:Johs12345
Hello. I've reverted your recent edit to British people because there were major formatting errors and you haven't explained your reasoning for contending previous edits. I advise not making major changes in one edit, but rather perform multiple edits with edit summaries. Regards, Rob (talk/edits) 13:17, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Looks like this editor has been reverting to previous versions of articles, sometimes six months into the page history, with an opaque or blank edit summary. Please don't do this again. --McGeddon (talk) 11:01, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
December 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Call of Duty, you may be blocked from editing. McGeddon (talk) 10:54, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
January 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to South Lebanon Army may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- {Infobox War Faction
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:04, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.
The edit summary appears in:
- User contributions
- Recent changes
- Watchlists
- Revision differences
- IRC channels
- Related changes
- New pages list and
- Article editing history
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! SummerPhD (talk) 16:03, 26 January 2014 (UTC) Your edit summary should explain why you are making the change, not that you feel it is "better". SummerPhD (talk) 16:03, 26 January 2014 (UTC)