User talk:Jlrflores
AfD nomination of Tajima's D
I've nominated Tajima's D, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Tajima's D satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tajima's D and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Tajima's D during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Sandstein 20:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia
Welcome to wikipedia and apologies as I am not on the "Welcoming Committee" who do a lovely job of showing people the ropes. However, I thought I'd write you a wee not to say: "Please do not be upset by the AfD of your article." Many many articles are nominated, for various reasons, but (usually) the AfD process is fair. The benefits of surviving an AfD (as I am hoping it will) is that your article is unlikely to be nominated again, and it brings it to the attention of lots of editors who might have suggestions for improvement. My suggestion is: Perhaps you could give it a bit more of an intro to explain to the layperson why and when Tajima's D is used. All the best and feel free to drop me a line. Mmoneypenny 22:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- I, too, would like you to welcome you here. I've withdrawn my nomination for deletion mentioned above; please see my comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tajima's D. Best, Sandstein 05:00, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
rem Tajima's D
Yes, that's quite excellent, a good intro, thank you. Herostratus 01:54, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Rough FDR
Hi, you askde me about the rough fdr calculation in the article on false discovery rate. I edited some part of that article, but I didn't have anything to do with the section about RFDR and I dno't know anything about it. Must have been someone else.John Lawrence (talk) 15:00, 21 November 2008 (UTC)