User talk:Jklamo/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Jklamo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emil Škoda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Czech (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of laptop brands and manufacturers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyundai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:28, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The article Xindl X has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ToThAc (talk) 02:41, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Personal attack
This edit summary is not acceptable. I agree with you that it reads better as "Czech Republic", but changing it to Czechia is not vandalism because it is a legally recognized alternate name. Falsely accusing other users of vandalism is a personal attack and not allowed. buidhe 01:23, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
- I see you also did the same thing here, here, here, and here. Not cool. buidhe 01:31, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
- Please check User talk:JéeM84. If someone is repeatedly warned to not do something, blocked for that and still doing that, I do not think that calling that vandalism is personal attack.Jklamo (talk) 08:07, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of SkyscraperCity for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SkyscraperCity is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SkyscraperCity (5th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jamie Tubers (talk) 16:39, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
List of long railway tunnels in China
Hi,
All that I have done is to swap the miles (mi) and kilometre (km) values in the convert function. What is wrong with that? The way that mi and kn are listed as if they they were one and the same is stupid. ----MountVic127 (talk) 23:00, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Convert test
99.42 miles (160.001 km)
160 kilometres (99.419 mi)
The only issue should be the number of decimal places. ----MountVic127 (talk) 23:37, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
List of laptop brands and manufacturers
In your edit of 23:10, 2 November 2015 of List of laptop brands and manufacturers, you introduced this markup:
<ref>{{cite web|title=Asia Hardware Sector|last=Wu|first=Thompson|date=19 January 2015|publisher=Credit Suisse}}</ref>
which results in a Missing or empty |url= error. Would you kindly supply the URL or take care of this error? —Anomalocaris (talk) 17:09, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
COVID-19 vaccine trial
Hello. You entered a source for preclinical research in the table for the Janssen candidate, and I removed it, then you put it back in. We haven't used any preclinical (animal) research in this table because it presents the candidates in human trials and their associated publications on human effects. Please remove that source or I will with my next table edit. Please don't edit war, WP:WAR. Thanks. Zefr (talk) 15:27, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Xindl X (September 17)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Xindl X and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Xindl X, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Jklamo!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Salimfadhley (talk) 01:00, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
|
Bank of Naples
Following the Nth cancellation of this << Not to mention Banco di Napoli, whose origins date back to 1539, when the first mount of piety was established in Naples; [1] the bank, absorbed by different entities between 2002-2017,[2] is still operating as subsidiary bank in southern Italy;[3] according to some scholars its origin may be daten back to 1463;[4][5] this would make the Bank of Naples the oldest bank in continuous operation till 2018, world-wide. >> I will do what in my power - in my free time - to report Wikipedia as a platform who discriminates Italian History and Identity. There is nothing to be taken personal in my affirmation. Thanks --AlexanderFreud (talk) 18:30, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Removing Proposed from the page tallest buildings in the EU
Hi just wanted to ask you to stop deleting the proposed list from the page as it's need just as much as the under construction one.
Thanks. Omg55557w77w7 (talk) 14:22, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- Please discuss that at appropriate plate. Jklamo (talk) 02:24, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi! I'm aware you have contributed to some EU related articles in english Wikipedia. I write to you to demand your support to keep EU figures and data in country-related lists like in List of countries and dependencies by population. Please, add your say to my proposal of EU data. Thanks--Manlleus (talk) 21:05, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
| Continued good work at all tall building articles — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robynthehode (talk • contribs) 09:44, 4 February 2021 (UTC) |
Palais Royale Mumbai
Hi. I have reverted the edits made by you on subject page on 7 Feb 2021. The changes I had made on Feb 4 2021 are properly derived and sources cited include newspapers and the actual Supreme Court judgement dated October 2019. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:201:A:C064:4C30:D8BB:D1FC:D278 (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
List of tallest buildings in the European Union
Please explain the significance of the fragment you're edit-warring for. LordParsifal (talk) 23:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Talk:List of tallest buildings in the European Union is more suitable place. Please try to found consensus for your edits there.Jklamo (talk) 23:46, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
List of tallest buildings
Please explain your reversion of my edits for the List of tallest buildings. You should add "according to CTBUH" clause to the first line of the section "Buildings under construction". I myself added the clause but another user Robynthehode (talk) has reverted it. Here is his explanation. "This is a list of buildings taller than 350 m that are currently under construction. Although the vast majority of sources are from CTBUH. CTBUH is not the only source that could be used so this additional intro should be left out (RW 16.1))". Therefore, either the list should ONLY include building according to CTBUH or it should include other references too. Maqayum (talk) 16:21, 22 March 2021 (CST)
- @Maqayum: Adding 'according to CTBUH' is unnecessary. One reference as far as I can see (Jeddah Tower) is not from CTBUH but that's not the point. While CTBUH is used as the most reliable source it isn't the only source across building articles. If this table changes and other editors add buildings under construction using other reliable sources (such as Emporis) then the added 'according to CTBUH' is clearly wrong. Therefore the presence of 'according to CTBUH' is just another thing to monitor. Readers can see whether the source is 'according to CTBUH' by mousing over or clicking the reference link. Robynthehode (talk) 22:07, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
highest bridges article
Hi there: you were the last one to make edits on the highest bridges. The coding is ALL messed up and I don’t want to reverse all your changes. Would you please fix the coding so the table is visible again? Thank you! Dym75 (talk) 15:43, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- See Template:Row numbers, it is a mobile app-related problem. It is not related to the last edit, the list is using that feature 2+ years.--Jklamo (talk) 23:50, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Are you paid by Kiwi.com?
My edit on the Kiwi.com scam page is not based on simply "sourcing" on FB but reporting the fact that there is such a FB page in the first place, with THOUSANDS of people reporting their scams there (including myself, by the way). If you don't have a better reason than "FB sourcing" I will revert your revert. I can add the link to "external sources", but it's a better solution to add this to the body of the page. Peteruetz (talk) 13:15, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- No, no one pays me. There are thousands of facebook groups/pages, you must provide sources that yours is notable. Also note WP:ADVOCACY.--Jklamo (talk) 01:41, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
August 2021
Hello, I'm Ziad Rashad. Your recent edit(s) to the page List of tallest buildings in Africa appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. This revision seems to be incorrect, you've removed 'Cairo Tower' supposedly "for not being a skyscraper" when it is a skyscraper of above 120m. - 𓋹 𝓩𝓲𝓪𝓭 𝓡𝓪𝓼𝓱𝓪𝓭 𓋹 [user | talk] 04:13, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Re: Andrej Babiš and template
The reason it was initially included is because up until yesterday his name was included in/on said template, so at the time it made sense to include that template on his article. Didn't realize he wasn't in office until the template was updated (yesterday) thereby making the addition moot. Snickers2686 (talk) 17:30, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Hidden text at List of conventional hydroelectric power stations
About eight years ago, you made this edit to List of conventional hydroelectric power stations, indicating in hidden text that Bekhme Dam was "on hold". This should not remain perpetually hidden in the wikitext. Can this be addressed in some manner where it either remains visible, or is removed to the talk page? Cheers! BD2412 T 03:10, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
- At the monent List of conventional hydroelectric power stations is not listing on-hold power stations, thus, without changing the scope of the list, it is not possible to mention the power station there. Feel free to remove it even from the hidden text (and possibly move it with other on-hold stations to the talk page) or to initiate a discussion at the talk page of the list about listing on-hold stations. Jklamo (talk) 09:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Remarkably lousy sources
I can see your heart was in the right place when you restored the WP:DOB to Paulina Porizkova, but both sources were lousy. The first one, the National Library of the Czech Republic lists Wikipedia as a source. That would be WP:CIRCULAR. The second one was WP:IMDBREF - a user generated site.
Please be more careful when selecting sources. They need to be reliable. Toddst1 (talk) 01:55, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of World Trade Center (1973-2000)
A tag has been placed on World Trade Center (1973-2000) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MB 05:23, 23 September 2022 (UTC)