User talk:Jasonmhood

August 2018

In lieu of reply, I have reviewed your revisions to my additions and remain unclear as to how they are promotional in nature. They appear to be neither a violation of published policy any more than other links in these sections. Perhaps you could advise as to your reasoning? Jasonmhood (talk) 15:49, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Can you specify the instance of adding promotional material to which you are referring? Jasonmhood (talk) 15:13, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:01, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

You are mass spamming a website that has no encyclopedic value. Consider this a final warning. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:51, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

How do the links I have added to these pages differ from other content on the same pages, for example, listing another curriculum company of the same type as those already listed? Please advise. Jasonmhood (talk) 15:54, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

You're mass spamming a single link for your website and publisher that is not notable. Perhaps you should also read WP:EL and WP:COI. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:56, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply. I read those sections before my first edits and again after your first comment. The publisher in question is a multi-million dollar, multinational company with a larger reach and notability than others listed under the same headings. Could you advise as to why that would not be considered "notable" in light of other listed publishers? Also, please note, this is a new user account for me. I had been very active on Wiki several years ago and am trying to feel my way around what appears to be a somewhat new environment.