User talk:Janu Gee
Welcome
|
February 2017
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kangana Ranaut, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 08:17, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Mona778. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Beren Saat without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mona778 (talk) 06:28, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Reference errors
Hi there, your recent edits at Mahira Khan introduced numerous reference errors. This is going to require other editors to clean them up. If you aren't familiar with how to edit at Wikipedia, perhaps you should start off slowly instead of making massive changes. And if you're not clear how to add references, please see Referencing for Beginners. When you name a reference using <ref name=" "> formatting, you should be sure to name the references something unique so they don't conflict with other references. Generic labels like "Times of India" aren't good choices. "TOI 3-day gross" would be more specific. Also, you should check to see if other references of that name already exist. Your edits have been reverted. You may resubmit the content provided the changes are properly sourced. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:55, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
February 2017
This is the only warning you will receive about ownership of articles, which you showed at Kangana Ranaut. The next time you continue to disruptively edit Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 11:50, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at Mahira Khan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Stop using Wikipedia to promote your so-called "cousin". Krimuk2.0 (talk) 11:53, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Shut up!!I will continue making good articles. You racist. I'll block you if you pinch your nose in my stuff. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Janu Gee (talk • contribs)
- Hi, please don't make personal attacks. This is a collaborative environment and civility is required. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:01, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Kangana Ranaut shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:24, 17 February 2017 (UTC)