User talk:Itainteasybeingcheesy

Welcome

Hello Itainteasybeingcheesy, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

• Table of contents

• Department directory

Need help?

• Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
• Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
• Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

• Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
• The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
• Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

• Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

• Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

• Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

• If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Itainteasybeingcheesy, good luck, and have fun. – Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) ^talk 14:55, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Alice Bailey

You've just arrived and you're accusing others of vandalism. Hmm. I'm opening a thread on WP:FTN and am likely to do some major deletions on the Alice Bailey page, as it is much too long. Itsmejudith (talk) 15:38, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Potential edit warring on Alice Bailey

Your recent editing history at [[:Alice Bailey]] shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Please keep in mind that you should assume good faith, particularly when reverting things that are not obvious vandalism. IRWolfe-'s edits may have removed a large number of characters, but they were clearly not vandalism and in fact a reason was given in the edit summary. Note also that you were reverted by a different user, itsmejudith. That's pretty clear evidence that IRWolfe- wasn't vandalizing the article, but rather attempting to improve it. In the future take it to the talk page rather than reverting a second time. 0x0077BE [^talk/_contrib] 16:23, 18 February 2014 (UTC)