User talk:Interesting Geek

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Accidentally undid your fix

Hi, I accidentally rolled back your fix of vandalism on Zack Snyder. I have manually fixed the vandalism. This sometimes happens when intermediate edits get caught up in Pending Changes. Jip Orlando (talk) 13:42, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Its alright :) I too thought why my edit was pending. Interesting Geek (talk) 13:44, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Interesting Geek! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! BlackcurrantTea (talk) 12:21, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Interesting Geek (talk) 14:25, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

Hi there, Interesting Geek, and welcome to Women in Red. Now that you have gained some basic experience in editing, you might feel ready to create your first biography. If so, you should first look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 10:19, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April editathons from Women in Red

Women in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Ipigott (talk) 10:19, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 21:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

June 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

About "censorship"...

Hello. You called my actions "censorship", but are they really? Censorship is intentional silence, but I have removed sentences that are not reliable. Rather, they are useless at all. If not right, then I am ready to listen to your suggestions. Regards.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Vremirr (talk • contribs)

Check this edit out, such edits do not contribute to Wikipedia. Your edit triggered a filter which showed that you removed references. Now there's a chance that the cited sources are not reliable, then you may go ahead. Your edits look unconstructive. I suggest you rather try going through guidelines and doing recent patrols until you familiarize yourself rather than editing controversial BLPs.Interesting Geek (talk) 11:03, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

JURIX

why have you notified me about this speedy deletion? i am not sure why at all you notified me. if it was speedy creation then i am sure i did not create anything in the very near past like that. if it was there for a while, then removing it the speed way sounds a bit overkill. not sure at all for the moment why ticking me for that. --Alexander.stohr (talk) 18:23, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexander.stohr, (see deletion log)The article was deleted as per A7. The article seemed like an advertisement and didn't have any mention by other sources. The only reference to the article was it's official website, so I think my action was justified? Also, the creator of the article has the right to oppose CSD or AFD, hence I notified you.
Ps. I didn't want to do an afd so the other best option was to tag for csd. It might have been an overkill but the article was still not notable enough. Interesting Geek (talk) 19:47, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I feel like I can follow these your argue. --Alexander.stohr (talk) 12:17, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of OnePlus products has been accepted

List of OnePlus products, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– bradv🍁 02:52, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Saw that you're a school student too, like me.
Rare to find someone sooo similar to me here :D
Nice to meet you friend! :)

YashPratap1912(CONT.) 14:58, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@YashPratap1912 thanks for that man :) would like to hear more from you Interesting Geek (talk) 17:35, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Interesting Geek! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Error in Requests for adminship/Cydebot, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been pruned from the Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Members list.

Hi Interesting Geek! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 1 year.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Interesting_Geek"