User talk:InterestGather

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Polestar.

Why do you all remove the chinese owner change when it’s true. I am shocked that wiki allows you to hide things. Either you are somehow biased or I am wrong. Let me try to explain. If Donald trump bought Volvo it would be a trump company. If the Germans bought Huawei it would now be a German company. If I bought your house it would now be my house. But you seem to be saying if the Chinese bought a Swedish company it is still Swedish. Not logical or consistent with the facts. Also check the MG cars listing to understand how other companies and editors are truthful 120.21.74.167 (talk) 21:38, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your explanation. I am not objecting to it being called a Chinese owned company. Follow Wikipedia:Manual of Style and do not paste your explanation IN the actual article. it is perfect for the talk page but not for the article. ✯✬✩InterestGather (talk) 21:43, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

- Solved ✯✬✩InterestGather (talk) 22:26, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


massacre meaning: an indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of many people.

Please stop posting political motivated information in Wikipedia. Nobody in Peru talks about a massacre and the meaning misused here. Habs2023 (talk) 22:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have no political motivations for Peru. I stand by what I said in the edit, discuss a change like this on the talk page and reach a consensus before making it. ✯✬✩InterestGather (talk) 22:12, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have already tried to discuss the change but the original author WMRapids, refuses to answer my questions. As such, we cannot leave fake information in Wikipedia and wait until the user replies. Habs2023 (talk) 22:15, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I will not personally rollback anymore changes to the "massacre" terminology however I remind you that you are still making errors that justify a rollback in your changes. Please ensure that all sentences are grammatically sound and follow Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and Wikipedia:Manual of Style: for example you edited "...was a Protest of Protestors" which is not grammatically sound.
Have a good day. ✯✬✩InterestGather (talk) 22:19, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I will wait until we can reach out the original author or any other reader who is willing to debate on the facts, otherwise, I will take the time to correctly do the changes. Habs2023 (talk) 22:23, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, you too. Habs2023 (talk) 22:23, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

- Solved ✯✬✩InterestGather (talk) 22:26, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


instead of making more changes, can you please look at the sources?

instead of making more changes, can you please look at the sources? Habs2023 (talk) 22:12, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Check above reply ✯✬✩InterestGather (talk) 22:13, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please ready my answer. I already ask WMRapids to show the source on why he thinks is a massacre. No source states that this is a massacre, nor in Peru, nor in Europe nor in USA. Habs2023 (talk) 22:17, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


- Solved ✯✬✩InterestGather (talk) 22:26, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Notification

Hello InterestGather, Thanks for your last contribution on Listenbourg and friendly message in the talk page. Is it possible to remove the unnecessary notification left on my personal talk page, now the misunderstanding has been cleared up? Best regards, Tukp (talk) 04:26, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tukp,
I've removed it for you. Thank you for being understanding.
Hope you have a good day ✯✬✩InterestGather (talk) 04:36, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

- Solved ✯✬✩InterestGather (talk) 03:06, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Asphyxiation beatings?

Did you mean to delete the comma between asphyxiation and beatings?      — Freoh 02:49, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could you link me to the edit? Thank you ✯✬✩InterestGather (talk) 02:51, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I linked the word delete in my comment above.      — Freoh 02:53, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Sorry I should've caught that. No I didn't intend to remove that, I am assuming you don't have an issue with the other revert? I've corrected the comma error revert though. I apologise for that and thank you for letting me know. I hope you have a good day. ✯✬✩InterestGather (talk) 02:58, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, though I do think that sentence could be worded better. It makes it sound like racism is a police tactic.      — Freoh 03:15, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

- Solved ✯✬✩InterestGather (talk) 03:06, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]