User talk:Insouciance7
March 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Michel Foucault, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Although the AIDS section did need some copyediting, it was well-backed by WP:RS according to WP:RSPSOURCES (The Guardian, pre-2013 Newsweek, and Chicago Tribune). Assem Khidhr (talk) 01:28, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Michel Foucault. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Assem Khidhr (talk) 03:56, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Insouciance7, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi Insouciance7! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 30 March 2021 (UTC) |