User talk:Imper1um

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Listen.

I am the one that is actually holding the Def Jam: Icon page together. I have NEVER posted any farce information there. The reference is the picture that is posted with the fighter. IT IS A reference, only it doesn't leave an ugly stain at the bottom of the page (in the form of a link) and is much easier to use that clicking your type of reference and then having to click the link. Like i said i only want to keep the Def Jam page tidy and the reference links only make it look dirty. I am the one that first posted confirmed fighters, i am the one who first posted info on the demo, i made the soundtrack table, I TOOK THE TIME to post the original album, I am holding that page down. I hate when people post fake news (Not you). --Wrestlingmann 06:35, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For Sure.

Yeah. That ref/picture works good. That is an even middle ground. I thought somebody was just saying they wanted it their way NO COMPROMISE. I have a backup for the page right now so if somebody messes with it it can always revert. I hate when people put fake crap up there. Like putting Lebron or Lil Wayne on the confirmed list without the least bit of proof. It really annoys me. I still haven't seen a restaurant level. Anyways. Sorry for thinking you were mad. I just want the page to look nice. I think we can work together to get that.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wrestlingmann (talkcontribs).

Def Jam: Icon

WP:NOT clearly states that Wikipedia is not an instruction manual or a game guide.--Drat (Talk) 06:55, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The list of achievements is fansite material. It is not needed for the article, and as a direct copy from another site, it is a copyright violation. The fact that other pages have such cruft is not reason to include it in this article.--Drat (Talk) 14:18, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I'll discuss such large changes in future. However, material can be accurate without being directly copied; the idea is to rewrite material in your own words.--Drat (Talk) 23:59, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]