User talk:Hta94

I'm new in Wikipedia, but open for any discussion I can help with.Hta94 (talk) 16:55, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hta94, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Hta94! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Natalia Toreeva (September 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Natalia Toreeva and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

» Shadowowl Marcos Rodriguez | t | SPI | AIV | Sandbox | Helpdesk » 18:33, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Natalia Toreeva has been accepted

Natalia Toreeva, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lacypaperclip (talk) 08:23, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi Hta94, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your very first edit, and indeed all 300 of your edits, have been to Draft:Natalia Toreeva, which no new user would have any way of knowing about. How did you come to know about that hidden draft and why have you been editing it? Softlavender (talk) 00:54, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

While asserting some good faith, he or she may have simply typed her name in the search box. If you choose everything and put a name in, the draft articles will appear in the search listing. The draft articles are not hidden that I know of. Try searching for example, Nihara Hareesh. Choose everything. Just an idea? Lacypaperclip (talk) 01:25, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm asking Hta94. Softlavender (talk) 02:24, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Softlavender (talk), I'm interesting in Russian art and the name of Natalia Toreeva is in the article Unofficial art in Russia. The Draft article existed and the good info also was in the Sandbox.Hta94 (talk) 19:35, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How did you come to know about that hidden draft? What Sandbox are you talking about? What "Unoffical art" article are you talking about? Softlavender (talk) 19:45, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was not hidden Draft. And in the Drafts I could read articles about other Russian artists and musicians. Please stop asking me strange questions. Thank you.Hta94 (talk) 20:04, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

These aren't strange questions. How did you come to know about the draft? What "Sandbox" are you talking about? What "Unoffical art" article are you talking about? What "Drafts" are you talking about where you "could read articles about other Russian artists and musicians"? Softlavender (talk) 20:28, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

the article in question is Soviet Nonconformist Art, 40% of which was written by User:Toreeva ; I have just removed two illustrations of her own art which she added to the article . DGG ( talk ) 23:01, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, the article in question is Natalia Toreeva, which was written by User:Toreeva. -- Softlavender (talk) 23:07, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I meant the "Unofficial Art" article referred to above. DGG ( talk ) 23:09, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

DGG ( talk ) 23:08, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]