User talk:Hizubiki25

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hizubiki25. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cabayi (talk) 06:08, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hizubiki25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have never created accounts to bypass the ban. Hizubiki25 (talk) 14:42, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You surely don't expect us to believe that "Hizubiki26" has nothing to do with "Hizubiki25", when both accounts edited about the same topic? 331dot (talk) 15:25, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hizubiki25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Just because two similar accounts edit a page does not mean that a person doesn't mean they are evading a ban.

Decline reason:

Don't insult our intelligence. If you have a legitimate explanation -- for example, both accounts are working for the same employer -- feel free to explain. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 19:45, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've fixed your request for proper display, though I was tempted not to since you are clearly insulting our intelligence. Someone else will review and likely decline this. 331dot (talk) 19:17, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hizubiki25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes I do that Hizubiki26 account is my friends. We do not work for the same employer we are just friends. Hizubiki25 (talk) 19:53, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

A friend creating an account name with virtually the same name and editing the same articles? Seems unlikely. Regardless, your editing has been deeply disruptive as you have made a large number of attempts to create some variant of a Naver Matome article, despite it being deleted in various forms no less then eight times. You appear to be behaving as if you refuse to hear. Further, your account seems to be at least a single purpose account, and quite possibly in violation of our required Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. I am, as a result, declining this unblock request and placing a paid editing warning below. Any further unblock requests will likely be unwelcome without addressing these serious concerns and/or without responding to the paid editing warning below. Further, any such requests may result in revocation of your talk page access. --Hammersoft (talk) 21:50, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Information icon

Hello Hizubiki25. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Hizubiki25. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Hizubiki25|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Hammersoft (talk) 21:50, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hizubiki25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So your saying it's not possible? I could've told him/her/pronoun here to do that. Plus I've been making changes to the Naver Matome Wikipedia for suggestions and added more sources. At one point an administrator that the latest draft wasn't an advertisement. The service ended in September and I do not have any affiliation with Naver/Line to promote any content so I nor the people who ran the service have incentive to promote that service. I have edited many Wikipedia pages not that one. You guys keep on denying the page because you haven't heard of the service. I have talked to many admins to say that it is not an advertisement. Hizubiki25 (talk) 22:09, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

WP:SOCK, WP:MEAT, doesn't really matter here. Yamla (talk) 23:08, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hizubiki25; to date, you have made 65 edits to articles on Wikipedia that are still in existence. So let's work through those;

That's 63 of your 65 edits to mainspace all having to do with Naver. The remaining two edits [3][4] are minor copyedits. So, 96.9% of your edits to mainspace are all having to do with Naver and your claim is you have no affiliation with Naver? You've been here for over a year, and in that time virtually your entire focus has been on things Naver. You're expecting us to believe this is entirely random, and that in that year nothing else but the two minor edits you did in mainspace today has struck your interest? Above, 331dot noted "you are clearly insulting our intelligence". I find myself quite incredulous about your claims. Four administrators now have denied your unblock request. We have all essentially reached the same conclusion about the veracity of your comments. --Hammersoft (talk) 23:30, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Naver matome (service)

Information icon Hello, Hizubiki25. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Naver matome (service), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Naver matome (service)

Hello, Hizubiki25. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Naver matome".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:27, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Hizubiki25"