User talk:HayesBob
Welcome!
|
August 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Institute for Learning has been reverted.
Your edit here to Institute for Learning was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/groups/153789048010230/?notif_t=group_activity, http://www.facebook.com/pages/I-disagree-with-the-forced-68-membership-for-the-Institute-For-Learning/167307803316593) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:13, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from mass deletion of text in articles
please refrain from deleting on mass substantial amounts of text on the pretext of ridding the article of uncited references. Such widescale alteration of the article should be discussed on the talk page first
Socialmedium (talk) 20:22, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Signing
Hello HayesBob,
When commenting on talk pages, please sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~) to add links to your user page, talk page and a time stamp. Thank you. Mangwanani (talk) 14:57, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
ACTA
Dear HayesBob Thanks for your additional reference in the ACTA article. You also added quite a lot of text, and I have taken the liberty of re-editing this. I should like to explain why. The short reason for this is that (i) it becomes unbalanced, since it gives a lot more information about the Bishop's view than ACTA's, (ii) it is verbose, since it includes quite a bit of redundant material (and what does self-styled mean in this context? - it was just a hasty put-down, since there is nothing wrong with anyone calling their group anything they wish). The longer reason is that some of the issues involved are potentially quite controversial and need to be treated with a lot of restraint if we're to keep a tone which everyone agrees is more or less objective; I've listened now to the radio interviews, and I think they went very badly – my guess is that neither Mr Walker nor the Bishop (who understandably sounded a little rattled by the tenor of some of the remarks) would want to say quite the same things again if they could have another go at it, so I think we should not make too much of the clash. Happy to discuss further. Deipnosophista (talk) 10:18, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, HayesBob. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article A Call to Action, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 18:38, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
We are not a link wall
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 22:25, 7 July 2015 (UTC)