User talk:Habord

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome!

Hello, Habord, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! PATH SLOPU 10:37, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Cernovich

Hello. Please find a reliable source for the triple parenthesis thing. As the article mentions, Cernovich admits to using trolling tactics for attention. Even if this weren't the case, we would need reliable, independent sources to establish which things are significant and which are not. Tweets are WP:SPS, which are fine for basic details or in some other limited circumstances, but this isn't one of them. I encourage you to discuss this on the article's talk page if you still disagree. Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 06:08, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Figured it was significant as it was his own tweet and a form of anti-Semitism the alt-right regularly trafficks in. He only went running from the label and stopped spewing that kind of stuff when the alt-right became more well known. Habord (talk) 06:15, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 18:06, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prisha Mosley (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qcne were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 21:28, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Habord! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 21:28, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]