User talk:Guyburns
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks for pointing out the problem at carboxymethyl cellulose. I have fixed it now. (However, in the future, it would be better to make comments about the article on the talk page instead - Talk:carboxymethyl cellulose, in this case.) ChemNerd (talk) 13:48, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
I reverted several of your recent changes to Circle of confusion, for reasons I've explained on the talk page. Some of the later changes might be OK, but Wikipedia articles need to be based on widely accepted facts or supported by reliable sources; cambridgeincolour does not qualify as such a source, and the values you support with that site are markedly at odds with values from several reliable sources. You also removed several nonbreaking spaces between quantity values and unit symbols; although that may not reflect your personal preference (or that of many photographic equipment manufacturers), it's required by the Wikipedia Manual of style, as well as by ISO and NIST. If you disagree with some of these points, please discuss them on the talk page.
Please don't be discouraged by the revert and my comments; these issues come up frequently with new editors. Hopefully, you'll stick around to contribute to Wikipedia. JeffConrad (talk) 08:55, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
I reverted one of your recent changes to Circle of confusion, and revised another, because these changes weren't correct, for reasons indicated in the history. Although Wikipedia policy encourages editors to be bold, it also urges them to be careful. Your comments on the talk page suggest that you're fairly new to this topic, and I would encourage you to ensure that you really understand the material that you consider revising. In the long run, you'll be a far more effective contributor.
I've once again restored defocus in several places; we sometimes need to make the distinction. For example, it makes absolutely no sense to talk about “blur spots” and “general blur spots” in the same context. Please don't remove these references again. I added mention of defocus in the first case under Two uses; hopefully this will make the term more clear. JeffConrad (talk) 04:14, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
If something seems wrong with an article, but you're not quite sure how to make it right, the best approach is to so indicate on the talk page (as you've just done). As I've indicated in detailed replies on that page, I agree with many of your points. Unfortunately, fixing some of them may not be something that's done in a few minutes. JeffConrad (talk) 04:16, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:24, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:21, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Duncan McIntyre Inscription.tif
Thanks for uploading File:Duncan McIntyre Inscription.tif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:05, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Duncan McIntyre's Grave.tif
Thanks for uploading File:Duncan McIntyre's Grave.tif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:06, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
File:Duncan McIntyre (Explorer).tif needs authorship information.
The media file you uploaded as File:Duncan McIntyre (Explorer).tif is missing information as to its authorship (and or source) , or if such information is provided it is confusing.
Although images may not need author information in un-controversial cases, or where an applicable source is provided, such information aids those making use of the image, and helps verify the copyright status of an image.
If possible, please consider updating the media information page to make the authorship (and or source) of this media clearer.
If the media is your own work, please consider explicitly including your user name or using the {{own}} template on the media information page.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:49, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Generalized gamma?
Why did you mangle the formula for generalized gamma, and replace it with one that only works for power laws? Dicklyon (talk) 05:27, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing it. I did some copyedits on your new stuff. Dicklyon (talk) 07:18, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:32, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Pink Floyd
Hi, I'm sorry about the revert to the Pink Floyd article summary saying your edit was vandalism. it wasn't in any way vandalism. Unfortunately my browser expanded the page just as I clicked on "undo", instead it hit "rollback vandalism" instead. The reason for the undo was that you cannot use Wikipedia itself as a reference as, ironically, it's classed as an unreliable source. Once again, sorry about the mistaken click. --The Pink Oboe (talk) 15:54, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- Pink Oboe is correct in that you may not use Wikipedia as a self-reference. References must be from 3rd-party reliable published sources. You may cut & paste the references from one article to another, however. Thank you,
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 17:31, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nadine Conner may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- her dressing room just after the 10-minute call: "They're mild and they agree with my throat"<ref>[http://archive.org/details/tobacco_sle13d00a Commercial starts at 27.31</ref>
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:03, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rock Hudson may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- In 1953 he appeared in a Camel commercial which showed him on the set of Seminole.<ref>[http://archive.org/details/tobacco_sle13d00a Commercial starts at 19.25</ref>
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:09, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John Wayne may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- In 1952 he appeared in a Camel commercial which showed him on the set of Big Jim McLain.<ref>[http://archive.org/details/tobacco_sle13d00a Commercial starts at 6.02</ref>
- tabid/447/mid/1508/articleId/946/ctl/ReadCustom%20Default/Default.aspx |title=Harris Polls > For the Second Year, Johnny Depp is America’s Favorite Actor |publisher=Harris Interactive |date=
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:17, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ernie Bond (bushman) (December 11)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ernie Bond (bushman).
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! Guyburns,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
|
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ernie Bond (bushman), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Hans Vonk Commendation 04 May 2004.ogg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hans Vonk Commendation 04 May 2004.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:51, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Jack Breheny.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Jack Breheny.jpg, which you've attributed to Arnold Rowlands. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:54, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Guyburns. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Duncan McIntyre's Grave.tif
Thanks for uploading File:Duncan McIntyre's Grave.tif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:19, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Guyburns. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Guyburns. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |