User talk:Guitarfan21

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Your submission at Articles for creation: Positive Grid (January 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Positive Grid products are used by top artists around the globe= clearly not neutral tone
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 21:33, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Guitarfan21! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:33, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Information icon

Hello Guitarfan21. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Guitarfan21. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Guitarfan21|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. SK2242 (talk) 03:27, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Positive Grid has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Positive Grid. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:34, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Information icon

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Guitarfan21, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Guitarfan21|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. You state that you work for the company so are still indirectly paid. Declare now on your user page before making any further edits. SK2242 (talk) 20:46, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Positive Grid (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SK2242 was:
Procedural decline until author declares they are paid on their user page
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SK2242 (talk) 20:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Positive Grid (April 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
It is never a good idea to lead with a ref from your own team - that is self serving and a big downer. Of the rest, the splash of adulatory refs about all the awards also add nothing but a sense that this feels very promotional. What remains in the middle are product reviews, some of which seem to have, at the very least, been "helped " by the company. Why else are the same images used across different reviews and publications. There is nothing here that establishes notability as Wikipedia defines it. It is a simple promo job.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
 Velella  Velella Talk   18:44, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Positive Grid

Information icon Hello, Guitarfan21. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Positive Grid, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Positive Grid

Hello, Guitarfan21. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Positive Grid".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:13, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Guitarfan21"